money.cnn.com
here's the start of your post-net neutrality life
Here's the start of your post-net neutrality life
Grayson Anderson
Tyler Lewis
Just in time for a new fiber giant to enter the scene. Large scale mergers of relics always happens towards the beginning of a crash and new paradigm.
Justin Ward
But Time Warner Cable was already bought by Spectrum. This is AT&T buying Time Warner Media. So, what's that got to do with net neutrality?
Gavin Foster
Has nothing to do with net neutrality. Are you faggots going to start doing this every time a telcom does something?
Cooper Russell
>by (((Hadas Gold)))
Hunter Flores
Fuck net neutrality. Fuck GDPR.
Jaxson Johnson
And fuck white people.
Hudson Cruz
Isaiah King
Less competition will be great for AT&T. Profits baby. It's all about bigger profits.
Jason Ramirez
this. now that net neutrality is gone there will be more innovation. (((Pai))) said so
Anthony Perez
Fucking jews
Wyatt Williams
>blocks your lawsuit
Logan Flores
FuckinG JEWS
TWC Charter merger mandated 7 years of no data caps. AT&T has data caps. What the fuck nigger?
Jace Watson
>Monopoly breeds innovation
retarded Muricans
Colton Russell
I thought spectrum got time warner though?
Thomas Bailey
Semi off-topic, but does anyone have any experiences with fixed wireless internet?
I live in a rural area so AT&T DSL was my only practical option for years, and all considered the service has been pretty good.
A local fixed wireless ISP opened up a while back though, and they offer slightly better speeds for the same price so I'm considering switching. This news makes me want to switch more.
I have no idea how fixed wireless compares to landline DSL in terms of connection quality though. Latency, packet loss, etc.
I'd have to pay an up front fee for a tower and router if I switch, so I'm a little worried about switching.
Joshua White
And they also happen without being followed by he beginning of any crash; they happen all the time. Stop grasping at straws nigger.
Jayden Hill
This is retarded, but it's got nothing to do with NN.
Brody Roberts
The creation of companies/organizations that act as internet service providers companies is illegal in many states, sometimes, but not always, depending on subscriber count.
Please, do tell how a new giant is supposed to enter the scene when they literally cannot.
Even Google couldn't.
William Jackson
*practically illegal
While technically illegal in theory, in practice, creating a new ISP is legally impossible due.
Lincoln Moore
*legal
*due to state legislature regarding land use and other shit
fug
Andrew Cook
>Nothing to do with NN
>Throttles not Time Warner content
Hunter Wright
What I'm worried about is how the US is partially undemocratic already and they'll probably find ways to galvanize the already ignorant population against democratic states. Particularly the ones that matter.
Luke Lewis
I think you're confused user, this is a thread about a merger.
Thomas Young
This has nothing to do with net neutrality. The merger would have happened anyway
Leo Johnson
>company buys company
What does net neutrality have to do with this?
Mason Cooper
Are you trolling
I quoted three anons stating this has nothing to do with NN
One of the huge US ISP's merged with a huge media company
What do you think they're going to do
The merge had nothing to do with NN But the repeal of NN gives them the possibility to forward there media outlet and throttle the other ones
Noah James
Joshua Parker
You must /b/ lost