Where were you when you swallowed the red C++ pill?
Where were you when you swallowed the red C++ pill?
Noah Ward
Other urls found in this thread:
en.cppreference.com
twitter.com
Camden Cox
A thread died for this.
Sebastian Hall
A post died for this.
James Watson
how about actual code generation instead of increasing compile time on every occasion?
Owen Clark
>C:\Users\Frank Castle\
kill yourself
Ryan Moore
y-you don't mean to say you use ceplesples for everything?
wut
Christian Scott
Why does C++ still need fucking header files in 2018?
Samuel Brooks
Sick game Frank, time to Google your name and make fun of you on Facebook.
Austin Martinez
There's modules support coming soon. I'm not sure if it's in C++17 yet.
Jeremiah Rodriguez
I would rather compute things compile time than realtime.
Dweebs.
Luke Ward
> using a struct template when variable templates have existed since C++14
> using a template at all for this
> not using a normal constexpr function
> using fp to store a moderately sized factorial instead of a BigInt library.
shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigy
Jace Rodriguez
>variable templates
What do you mean?
Camden Allen
A DOS prompt with TURBO C++
Parker Sullivan
...
Wyatt Torres
Checked
Blake Anderson
>BigInt
>factorial function returns an int
Back to CS 101
Lincoln Sanders
even if you extend factorials to the reals, OP's version is parameterized on int, dummy
Aaron Murphy
So? Z+ -> R+ is totally fine for factorials.
Ayden James
yeah, and it as also "fine" (and equally stupid and unnecessary) for:
Z+ -> C
Z+ -> H
Z+ -> O
...
you're too much of a dumbshit to be an effective condescending pedant.
Cameron Moore
>>variable templates
>What do you mean?
Blake Walker
unironically this
Jeremiah Morgan
Because the C++ standard committee is busy working on meme features such that people can do what OP did
Samuel Richardson
>header files
>not just convention
Easton Richardson
In haskell it is a one-liner
>factorial n = product [1..n]