Don't mind me, just blocking these ads

>Don't mind me, just blocking these ads

Attached: pickpocket-action-14999173.jpg (1300x999, 127K)

Other urls found in this thread:

newshub.co.nz/home/lifestyle/2018/06/i-set-up-facebook-ad-targeting-and-it-s-even-creepier-than-i-imagined.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...ok

>thinking you have a moral obligation to download and view anything you never intentionally requested

Attached: ashygddt.jpg (238x276, 10K)

>I am entitled to everything and anything
Leftists.

joks on u i wish it literary unironically equaled a truck of explosives going off inside google hq

yeah, you're entitled to allow/disallow specific things over the internet connection you pay for, you stupid fucking commie

>I know this business charges for its goods but I never intentionally requested to pay for them

>I'm entitled to get free money from people I don't know
obsolete entrepreneurs

>Stopping Pajeet from earning 2 cents a day

ads are more akin to begging for donations rather than requiring payment

after all, content creators can just charge a subscription fee for access to their content, right?

not when PIRACY is an equally rampant form of theft online

I wish that's really what ad blocking was like, just so I'd be really fucking over faggy ad companies by blocking their crap.

a pirated copy of software is a lost sale for the company

a site with ads is just the webmaster requesting donation for his content

>don't mind me, just not donating for this content

yeah, that's fine
if the webmaster wanted to require payment, he'd just put his content behind a hard paywall

>tries to trick you by placing a tiny download button and six fake download buttons that lead to ads

Attached: images.png (209x241, 11K)

i sure love my browsing history and other behavior being collected and sold by (((web analytics companies))) to fuck knows who, exploiting billion different shitflaws in the modern (((javascript)))-powered (((web stack))) (it's actually so bad now that there are proof-of-concept methods of user tracking even with JS disabled)

Oy vey goy, we're just trying to make the ads relevant to you.

guaranteed replies

>buying items in a store is the same as reading posts served by a publicly-accessible webserver
Imagine having this 32-bit logic in a 64-bit world

>le ebin tech snark
Go back to already

brb getting more free shit. stay mad.

t. butthurt reddit CEO

i will piss on your grave and rape your ashes, cuck

>he can't even muster the courage to ask a girl out
oh yeah I'm just shaking right now tough guy

Attached: 1461125726906.png (748x756, 168K)

newshub.co.nz/home/lifestyle/2018/06/i-set-up-facebook-ad-targeting-and-it-s-even-creepier-than-i-imagined.html
Articles like this remind me why adblocking is the first line of defence for everyone.

fucking retards.

>large companies that RUN THE JOB MARKET make most of their money from advertising

>the ads are put there by the site YOU ARE USING. adblocker is essencially sneaking into a movie theater without a ticket

you lazy ass nigtards are the reason the economy's about to crash again but

>"muh free shit"

>"too lazy to spend a few seconds letting an ad play, too lazy to get a fucking job and actually OBTAIN SOMETHING LEGALLY"

If I visit a department store and sit on a chair, am I obligated to buy it?
If I play on the demo PS4, am I obligated to buy it?

When was the last time that you THIEVES even read a sites terms of use?

>it's actually so bad now that there are proof-of-concept methods of user tracking even with JS disabled
The only thing to be thankful about is that it requires a lot more backside work to implement so that you can send the data to a third party. Most tracking shit is just some included third party javascript that does all the work.

>adblocker is essencially sneaking into a movie theater after the opening adverts

When was the last time a site presented terms of uses I had to agree to before reading anything on the site?

I can't even remember the last time I paid for software or saw an ad online.

>literally posting on one RIGHT NOW

So Jow Forums what was the last ad that you clicked on.

It's the fault of those that run malicious ads.
I used to never use an adblocker. The greedy admins started putting malicious, noisy, distracting ads on top of livestreams and content and blocking these ads has actually become a necessity to safely browse the internet.
Adblocking has become a habit for so many people because 3/4 websites (including this one) now have malicious ads that can possibly infect your computer with a virus, or track you, or both. Even if your website has non-intrusive and safe advertising you can still expect 9/10 of your users to have adblock on out of pure habit and just not be thinking about it because they've been fucked over too many times by some idiot that wanted an extra dollar.

Attached: angrymarine.png (2000x1154, 582K)

Nope.
They tell us to read the rules but you aren't presented with the rules to begin with. You just get a simple "you must be over 18".

>change channel when there is an ad on TV

well guess I'm a theif now

>Don't mind me, I got overcharged once

Attached: police-exercise-bank-robbery-bank-robber-with-a-gun-takes-hostages-C37JJ8.jpg (1300x956, 128K)

How should I know?
If I want to buy something that isn't local I already know where I would go to do it. Everything else is just begging for sales.

what kind of absolute retard would intentionally expose themselves to ads?

We aren't entitled to anything, but corperations sure are! You think leftists are slaves to government, well you are a slave to big business. Not a leftist btw.

>watch youtube with no adblock
>favorite channel uploads videos with no ads
>gets flagged for copyrighted material because he dared include 5 seconds of footage or music
>ads are now forced on the video and he makes 0 profit from it
>have to watch obnoxious ads before the video, during the video and after the video while banners keep popping up from below
golly, being a good goy is great!

even worse example
>watch youtube with no adblock
>watch ad before the video
>watch ad in the middle of the video
>continue watching the video
>AND NOW A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR, AUDIBLE.COM
>banner pops up in the middle of baked-in ad
>ad plays at the end of the video

I wonder why people would want to block ads, those fucking thieves!!!!!

This.

Attached: ads.jpg (867x647, 199K)

> Build business model in top of Malware spreading, privacy intrusion and clickbait bullshit
> get salty when it starts to crumble
You should be glad we even visit your shit ass Website, there are many others to take your place, you don't provide anything of value.
Ask for direct financial support, you will receive it if you are worth it. The whole Ad market should burn.

Attached: low quality bait.jpg (100x100, 1K)

I wonder why no one has defended this. Ads are primary a source of tracking, data mining or malware now. No one would ever object to a simple jpeg.

For a LIMITED TIME ONLY, get this starter pack and we'll throw in a vintage collector's edition animated-GIF "Punch the Monkey!" banner!

>>the ads are put there by the site YOU ARE USING. adblocker is essencially sneaking into a movie theater without a ticket
>Still watch ads if you don't arrive when the movie actually starts.

Not like there's any reason to worry, remember that people who do use ad blockers and the like are always the minority. They are drastically outweighed by normalfags using their phones and macbooks without any sort of filter so ad supported sites still make a profit, they just wrongly attribute decreasing profits to adblock users. Algorithms have changed, multiple visits from a single IP won't generate more revenue anymore, people who only stay for like 10 seconds won't generate more revenue etc. Also the content might just be shit and they won't admit it to themselves. Easier to blame adblock.

>Don't mind me, I'm from Europe (GDPR)
ftfy

>Don't mind me just stealing this copyrighted stock photo and posting a copy on a Chinese cartoons website.

>deciding what runs on the machine i bought with my hard earned money is leftism

>>the ads are put there by the site YOU ARE USING. adblocker is essencially sneaking into a movie theater without a ticket
>pay for ticket
>still have to sit through ads
thanks large companies that run the job market

I actually own the copyright though.

Attached: 1442982693635.jpg (256x320, 22K)

How about building a proper business?
Offer services and get payed for them proper, if you have something of value, I will pay you.

If I visit a restaurant, I want to sit down, get a proper meal, pay you, then leave.
I do NOT want to get a nasty, half eaten potato chip for free from you (one I did not ask for), then have you follow me around for the rest of my life while you read through my mail, eat from my fridge and shit all over my carpet.

proof or you're a liar

If adds would be like they used to be 15 years ago nobody would care. But they all have to be annoying popups, auto forwarding or autoplaying videos with annoying sound.
If they were just banners at the top or side I wouldn't even care to block them

>If adds would be like they used to be 15 years ago nobody would care.
Were you around 15 years ago? Because we had fake download links, animated-gif banners, and flash out the ass back then. Oh, and pop-ups. Those weren't blocked by default yet. For a while around that time there were people spamming ads to unprotected 2K and XP machines using net send to make windows pop up a little dialog box.

Advertising inherently does obnoxious shit. It can't be unobtrusive, because if its unobtrusive and not annoying, its ineffective. It has to either deceive you or forcefully distract you in order to work. This is why static banners were abandoned so early on (they were animated and flashing by the mid 90s). There's no such thing as an acceptable ad.

can't you put more effort into these threads op?

False, lel

if it aint broke

>I want to pay to own a portion of your mind
Fuck off, corporatist retard

Yeah I was.
I was ok with flashing banners.

there isn't a beforehand agreement

Is there a beforehand agreement that somebody won't take your wallet?
No? Then kill yourself you fucking thief

not accepting something that is offered to you isn't stealing, it's not wanting what's offered.

SO don't click the ads then you fucking thieving kike

>Is there a beforehand agreement that somebody won't take your wallet?
it's in the laws of the state you cretin

okay, and i don't. think of an adblocker as a guard dog. People who i want to come to my house have a treat, a whistle, a toy, something that the guard dog is happy to let them through. the people trying to come to my house and give me ads have none of those things, so the dog barks and runs them off. it's the same thing. I don't want what they're selling, and my dog knows to keep them away. i don't open the door for them, i don't see them, they fuck off elsewhere. everyone wins.