JUST

Miss me yet?

Attached: 7D87C5A4-ACD7-4C40-8035-C995724BD397.jpg (678x510, 114K)

Who

What dopey lookin son of a bitch

Attached: shadow_of_the_colossus.png (1024x768, 823K)

>JUST:

Attached: JUSTED.png (588x682, 306K)

Holy shit I just got that joke. That's hilarious.

wtf is that thing

EVERYTHING IS FINE

Attached: 1515126158597.png (1093x779, 408K)

Poor 10nm

who?

>what, he has a libido? HANG HIM NOW

Why do americans do this?

He was ousted for intel being in the shitter. This was just an excuse so that they didn’t have to admit that intel was in the shitter.

Because the tech industry is slowly being cucked by ego driven sjw's that are less tolerant than any man I know. The game industry has already suffered from this. It's when more attention is paid to other things rather than what these companies are there to do, is when quality control issues will start to present themselves. Just look at the state of EA and Ubisoft. It may seem Intel is on a similar path of fucking themselves.

tpbp, /thread

The sex with an employee was an excuse to oust him because he's ultimately responsible for not delivering on 10nm and Intel's horrendous market position going forward.

Having a relationship with somebody under your authority in an organization creates a massive legal liability (e.g., over promotions, project funding, other conflicts of interest, etc.) if people find out. There's a reason that you don't mix business and pleasure.

This
Not this. SJWs were just implemented on this occasion. Intel have been slowly fucking themselves for the last 8 years, their lack of progress and relevance isn't something that's happened since the me-too movement.

I saw their "diversity initiatives" but it seems they got pressured to do them by all these "journalists" making bad press.

You see it all started with an article on Gama Sutra titled "Gamers are dead" from witch intel pulled their adds because they live off gamers.
This of course resulted in other outlets like Gawker network to blame them for supporting gamergate and then they needed to do damage control.

They then started funding diversity and shit like FemFreq because they are afraid of bad press.

Shit like this can happen to AMD as well should they take they lead

based

My logic was way more general I suppose. Rather than the individual company, Intel, and there slow nose dive into obsolescence.

*Their

>diversity initiatives
Suddenly those mom and pop companies never looked so good.

We need to start a massive protest for Intel to replace him with a black woman CEO.
Either they look sexist and raciss, or we get a year or two of extreme free sides damage.

Executives honestly get away with this shit all the time. I've worked in 3 large publicly traded corporations, and you would not believe what kind of awesome positions some dumb bitch a year or two out of uni can get just because some high-ranking chief officer chose her as his toy. But as long as those executives are still doing their job, the (largely institutional) shareholders don't raise a ruckus, and nobody will ever seek to rock the boat and get rid of them. It's only when things go south that this kind of issue rears its ugly head.

Attached: b381f3e1eab027e7aaac7509caed62b96be652302fef57a0a77705b921c69901.jpg (627x627, 94K)

Attached: cf909123bfb18c77436eb25e6599d9af27bfab4a472f4a2761e2ed52b838741e.jpg (1400x700, 203K)

STRAIGHT MALE BTFO

ok Jow Forums which one of you works in bloomberg?

Yes I do, Jay Gerrick. Thanks for helping us beat Zoom.

Attached: 1499963016439.jpg (691x771, 112K)

is this a thread on John Cena?

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-06-21 22-19-17.png (1920x1080, 477K)

Attached: intel_collage.jpg (9999x9999, 3.69M)