Redpill me on the most permissive software license. MIT? Apache? CC0? Discuss

Redpill me on the most permissive software license. MIT? Apache? CC0? Discuss.

Attached: nocopyright.png (1024x1024, 22K)

Other urls found in this thread:

sqlite.org/copyright.html
openbsd.org/policy.html
softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/147111/what-is-wrong-with-the-unlicense
opensource.org/faq#cc-zero
wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/CC0_FAQ#What_about_other_IP_related_rights.2C_such_as_trademark_and_patent_rights.3F
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

inb4 freetards invent a 'please daddy' license

cc0, obviously

The Unlicense

BSD

wtfpl

The most permissive is explicitly give up your own copyright and put your work in the public domain.

Thoughts on the legality of Unlicense vs. CC0 vs. WTFPL? Ideally something that's recognized in (virtually) all jurisdictions worldwide, and is unlikely to get stricken as "invalid".

For example SQLite has no copyright at all:
sqlite.org/copyright.html

Public domain