>"Hickey said that when an iPhone is plugged in and a hacker sends it passcode guesses using keyboard input (as opposed to typing on the screen), the action triggers an interrupt request that takes precedence over everything else. That means the iPhone would be too busy to erase the device if the attacker sends it one passcode guess after another. As a result, they can guess as many times as they want instead of being limited to 10 guesses."
Obviously the secret laws passed after 911 which gave us Intel ME require developers to include exploits which can be used to bypass the security the stupid goyim think they can maintain.
Obstruction of justice. You're still going to jail faggot.
Cameron Moore
Sadly this, turns out that police officer had something traced him back to the alleged cp he had.
Bentley Allen
It's obstruction only if they can prove he had the evidence on his phone. Pro tip: not giving up your password is not obstruction of justice. We have an important amendment for that, the Fifth. Maybe you've heard of it?
Charles Lee
hey officer i can enter my password for you
*30 minutes later*
whoops i guess i remembered it wrong how else can i help you
John King
It doesn't even need to get that far
>unlock your device >"no"
David Turner
>Set up secondary password on phone >When you enter secondary pin, the police will login to separate account
Here, officer. I unlocked my phone. The password is .....
Michael Young
Personally I think it look better on your part if you pretend to go along with their demands and then forget your password. Happens all the time.
Saying no somehow implies you have the ability to unlock it.
Matthew Kelly
Christ.
I know you bastards have the webm of APFS encryption having a blank entry backdoor. Post it.
And that'll work right up until they use some rubber hose cryptanalysis on it.
Andrew Johnson
Local cops won't do that. In all likelihood, federal agents won't do that for something mundane like child porn.
Buuuut if you have undesirable information on Hillary or a military/surveillance leader, they won't even try to extract your password. They'll just kill you. ie: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hastings_(journalist)
Honestly, this was his own fault What moron buys a remote controlled car? Stallman was right, again Only buy freedom autos
Liam Cook
Unless you're driving something from before ~1999, you don't have a choice.
And if you look at the death statistics vs model year, it's actually pretty astounding how much less safe older cars are. ie large SUVs from the early 2000s are literally multiple times more likely to kill you in a crash than a modern compact sedan like a Civic.
So you trade protection from electronic attacks for significantly more likely death in an accident.
Besides that, they don't have to electronically attack a car to make it kill you. The CIA has been killing journalists and "problem individuals" abroad for, literally, decades. They have it down pretty well by now.
Caleb Peterson
scary how many electronics cars depend on nowadays
i heard electric bikes are pretty okay for an urban location
probably not enough "stuff" in the bike to cause a fatal accident
but maybe they'll just remote a freighter and make it drive into you
Nolan Price
There are post-1999 cars without this It's you morons with OnStar(TM) and other proprietary, remote controlled software, that have this problem You have your little antenna bumps on your SUV crossover and you don't even realize what they are for
