IPS vs TN: Is it worth it?

Any experiences with increased input lag?
Opinions about the viewing angles and better colors are also welcome.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1920x1080, 149K)

Other urls found in this thread:

lg.com/ca_en/desktop-monitors/lg-27MP58VQ-P
apple.com/shop/product/HKN62LL/A/lg-ultrafine-5k-display?fnode=8a
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>TN
shitty viewing angles
>IPS
no blacks, bleeding, shit backlight, over-saturation, slow response time, input lag

hmm I wonder

delet

eh i use a tn and an ips, the ips is 4ms 4k and the tn is 1ms 1080p 240hz, only downside to the tn is the viewing angles but if your sat at a desk it doesn't really matter if you've got an adjustable stand. The tn's not true 8 bit colour either but that's just because i've got a gaymen monitor.

TN is garbage.
IPS has shortcomings with gaming.
VA is a good compromise.

Attached: wew.jpg (278x253, 12K)

This is why everybody should buy oleds...
Oh wait, screen burn-in lol

It's a damn lifesaver on laptops. Wouldn't buy a tn desktop screen either.
I've Dell U2515h, great colors, minimal blacklight bleed, no visible difference in input lag.

How good is va in all honesty? I cant stand tn at all, it looks like utter shit. I understand the flaws of ips but tn's color shift just fucks me up

Just get a non-shit IPS monitor and the lag isn't an issue

ips is fine, i'm not a gaymer so the 5 extra milliseconds don't really matter much
oh no muh black color how will i watch my BLACKED porn

Just get a non-shit TN panel and viewing angles aren't an issue either.

Especially on a desktop

The problem is that I've limited budget, something about 300$-400$.
In this price section (from what I'm interested in) there are 1ms TNs and 5ms IPSs.
Note: I'm looking for a 27", switching from an old shitty Dell P2210

>TN
Slightly faster response time that you notice in fast paced games
>IPS
Significantly better colours and viewing angles that you notice whenever you look at your monitor.

It's the exact same as the 4k vs 120hz debate. Unless you're very dedicated to a few certain games it's not even a contest.

I've played over 1000h in cs and didn't require anything more from my monitor. Honestly, my main requirement is the size. After years of playing on a 22" 1680x1050 display I'm tired of lack of size and weird resolution setting.
I'm also afraid that full hd may be a little bit too small for that size. Any opinions on pixel density? Usually I sit about 50cm from the screen (it's about lenght of your arm, amerifags). Isn't full hd too small for 27"?

What about VA?

>non-shit
>TN
Choose one

OLED

No. I used a highend TN panel until a few days ago. The difference is very slight.

I had a cheap 1080p IPS here last year, compared directly, it was no difference to my expensive 4K TN. Compared to my new highend 4K IPS its a slight difference, more saturation and better colors, but its still slight.

The only reason to switch was because I got this monitor cheap and it has no bleeding. It costs almost 1K regularily.
I wish 4K100+ existed. And no, I don't talk about overpriced garbage panels with shitty fans inside them.

Attached: DSC_0012.jpg (3840x2160, 2.72M)

Well if you want to maintain a typical pixel density 1440p is the go-to for 27". Personally though I use a 24" 4k monitor and use 2x scaling so everything is the same size as my old 1080p monitor.

>TN
If you care about playing any fast-paced game where higher fps/refresh rate would make for a more pleasant experience.
>IPS
If you do any sort of art/design/video/graphic work where you need to care about precise color accuracy and such things, and/or want an overall better picture quality.

Also, if you want your setup to have a monitor rotated 90deg to a portait orientation, then TN === BAD b/c shit viewing angles, even on high-end tn panels.

when you go ips you never go kys

>screen burn-in
No thanks

So how much a good TN would cost? Sounds like a good compromise for me

Attached: GbaTEGu.png (320x320, 109K)

Also, what'd y'all think about this?
Found it decent-priced so it might be a good solution for me

lg.com/ca_en/desktop-monitors/lg-27MP58VQ-P

Attached: Global_27MP58VQ_2016_Gallery_medium01.jpg (940x620, 110K)

>Slightly faster response time that you notice in fast paced games
Not really. The actual response is the same unless you have old or shitty IPS panels.

For me it was, 2014 there were only TN 4K with Gsync. The first IPS models arrived late 2015, but they were extremly expensive (and still are). Not worth the switch, I wanted a real upgrade and more Hz. Now I got a 32" 4K IPS with Gsync for 500 €, no bleeding issues. Seems like a good deal, I only need a mount. This thing is fucking big.

Attached: DSC_0013.jpg (3840x2160, 2.45M)

$400 for ~240hz G-sync is the one you're looking for

OLED monitors when?

VA imo is the best compromise. It can be the slowest of the 3 main panels but you actually get contrast and colors. Again not the fastest but I’m no “leet uber gamer” so it doesn’t matter too terribly.

I got a Acer Predator TN, view angle is garbage

Does TN fix the motion blur problem LCD has compared to CRT?

crt

Attached: 1529200310592.jpg (960x526, 34K)

>Not realizing that the newer IPS 144+ hz displays are awesome for gaming.

>thing that happened 5 years ago
Technology improved, get your head out of your ass.

Why? I never had problems with it, I sit directly in front of it. Multimonitor would be probably a problem.
>TFW people still use this meme to justify their lazyness to still use ancient and power-inefficient CRT technology
The early TFTs were shit compared to good CRTs, but the market has developed. Around 2008 TN was still the top-tier with a few exceptions, nowadays IPS is the toptier even in midrange consumer areas. These screens outperform CRTs by any means.

I also noticed, they draw less power compared to older TFTs. I had a 17 inch 1280 x 1024 Acer from ~2006, this thing was shitty as fuck and it got hot.

tn everything else is a meme

I haven't really noticed any input lag, but I don't play a shit ton of twitch shooters.
The color reproduction is more worth it anyways imo.

Attached: 73783786456.png (399x55, 4K)

I got two hp omen 32 monitors and I love them. Seems like a steal with $275 at costco

32 inch VA panel 1440p with 75 hz

>These screens outperform CRTs by any means.
They don't. Image quality on CRT's is still superior in every aspect. The only thing modern displays do better is geometry, convergeance and panel size.

Do you have any proof, can a CRT match a top-end IPS screen in terms of color accuracy, even the calibrated ones? CRT technology development has stopped as far as I know. There is no demand for it anymore.

>CRT technology development has stopped as far as I know. There is no demand for it anymore.

It is not necessarily that demand went away and more that yurocucks outlawed the leaded glass necessary to keep your CRT from giving you testicle cancer.

I seriously don't give a shit what kind of display technology I have as long as I can tell the colors apart and it's bright enough.

have LG IPS from when 1080p first came out and still no dead pixels. literally dropped the monitor 3feet to wood floor.

no.

Both are shit can confirm having used both for over a decade

wait for joled

What do you think is going to happen to that leaded glass once the monitor has reached the emd of its lifespan?

CRT is only superior for motion, it's garbage otherwise

>IPS
Blacks become gray, backlight bleeding everywhere, laggy af
>TN
Okay blacks, 5° viewing angle
>CRT
Heavy, bulky, doubles as a space heater
>OLED
Burns itself by itself
>MicroLED
Doesn't exist

Attached: 1494982833847.jpg (653x490, 32K)

TN just hurts to look at, can't imagine it's any better for your eyes than the old cathode ray tubes. Definitely go LCD/OLED.

Older LCD monitors used a CFL backlight. Newer ones use LED.

sent to china to be stripped of $0.25 of gold and $0.35 of copper :)

Attached: trashman5.png (570x489, 406K)

>no blacks

based.

Burn in is a meme, hide your task bar and have the screensaver kick in after an hour of inactivity and it will last you until you want to upgrade to the new hotness. Too bad nobody makes OLED desktop monitors since phones and TVs are using up all their supply already.

i'm thinking about getting this monitor, it is 5k display

apple.com/shop/product/HKN62LL/A/lg-ultrafine-5k-display?fnode=8a

thoughts?

>screensaver kick in after an hour of inactivity
but there are a lot of tasks that take no "activity" at all on most of the image, like editing a video, using the browser, etc.
Maybe one frame out of 60/75/120/144 etc being pure black or another color could help and not being noticeable?

OLED and CRT all suffer from burn in but in the case of OLED it's that each subpixel/element has a limited lifespan and deteriorates in a predictable fashion. CRT burn in results from displaying a static image for extended periods of time which cause the affected phosphors to become hot and literally burn out. They're called burn-in but it's a completely different process.

I have both, side by side. I use the 180hz TN for gaming and browsing. I use the IPS for watching movies and Photoshop.

Attached: 2018-06-12 04.02.04.jpg (2111x3017, 3.71M)

asus pb278q

MICRO LED NEEDS TO SAVE US