How do I get a smart coder gf?

How do I get a smart coder gf?

Attached: gf.jpg (921x1280, 132K)

Other urls found in this thread:

eli.thegreenplace.net/2004/08/08/equality-in-lisp
mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/sicp/index.html
dwitter.net/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

ueeghhhhh

>===
Nani?

Piglet's mother

We sure do hate women, am I right boys?

I just looked this up and learned that this is a thing in JavaScript
Wow that language is a mess

Holy fuck that font size
Might as well glue a magnifying glass around her eyes

>not just saying while(today)

this is a retarded coder gf

Women are the worst, most of them don't even know Haskell.

>I've never seen it before therefore it's bad.

Why would anyone learn about dead dogs?

cute boy
>he doesn't know

Ruby is also pretty weird, if I'm not mistaken there's like 4 ways of comparing stuff.

Reminds me of a co-worker
bool isValid = checkValid() ? true : false;

hahaha WOMEN amirite

>=
assignment

>==
equality with type coercion

>===
exact equality check including type

it's not that hard

absolute brainlet

=== is one of the more sane things about javascript.

== is a comparison of equivalence, they don't have to be the same. It also exists in PHP.

Examples of equivalence:
100 == "100"
"" == false
0 == false
undefined == null

Clone me but swap the Y chromosome for a X chromosome.

everyday is today, this predicate doesn't make sense, will loop forever. also she should've put that argument as string in log(). baka

also js is weird with types, prob best to === or !! that shit.

Attached: hmmm.jpg (752x620, 131K)

It's not bitterness I swear!

Isn't today always going to return true?

Attached: 1518632532530.jpg (300x299, 11K)

you are like little baby

eli.thegreenplace.net/2004/08/08/equality-in-lisp

>while(today===true)
>while today is true
>aka "if today exists"

Why are people so fucking stupid?

Attached: 1526398382981.jpg (640x640, 187K)

Attached: teach-me.jpg (400x400, 60K)

Print happy Friday as long as today is exactly true , EXACTLY EQUAL TO TRUE means she had to declare today =1 for it to work or do a circlejerking function where today ends up being 1..... what a retarded way to code

Why would I need == anywhere instead of ===?

But won’t that loop always be true since today is every day?

Yeah but what about yesterday? Yesterday isn't today, therefore it wouldn't have worked.

type coercion. js is kinda retarded about that. don't even get me started on null and undefined. all hail typescript.

It's false on Mondays because 0 = false

I recommend leaving your mom's basement every now and then. 100% of the people posting in this thread would fuck her given the chance.

>How do I get a smart coder gf?
>people get angry about a bait pic instead of answering the question
Fuck. I need answers!

Yes. Somebody called her out on it. She wasn't happe about that.

Attached: afe72ffb.png (1280x722, 734K)

amerimutts usually enumerate Sunday as 0

Typescript gets turned into javascript. Your entire language is pointless

Do not want

Attached: 1 (1).jpg (600x850, 835K)

Because maybe some retarded coworker sent you a string instead of a number, and when you try to add some value to it you end up joining strings instead, and now a your data is fucked up.

Attached: womyn-coder.jpg (1228x2713, 1.23M)

typescript transcompiles (or whatever sjw coders call it this week) to vanilla js. depending on how anal you set it to be, it may fail to do so upon encountering type mismatches or whatever.

>caring about a woman's skills or intelligence

Attached: 1529352532503.gif (202x360, 1.84M)

Sunday is the first day of week everywhere I know.

No thanks son, I'll just keep banging the wife.

As for the daft cow in the photo, I've seen better looking crack whores.

I stand by my original statement, Piglet's mother.

Attached: son1.jpg (425x370, 19K)

So is this a parody account or what?

Attached: 1529832987512.jpg (282x341, 19K)

>0
>Sunday or Monday
>the great debate

desu Monday makes more sense. Sunday is usually a free day along with Saturday in the civilised world.

>dumb slut makes a dumb slut mistake
>autist soi male owns her passively-aggressively over it
Is this how a fistfight looks in america?

Attached: 1462900040209305455.png (445x208, 47K)

I really want to believe it is

The rest of her twitter is filled with exactly the same garbage. Unfortunately it's real.

Honestly this is one of the few places where I can unironically reply "go read SICP"

mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/sicp/index.html

monday = segunda feira
that translates to "second day" so yeah no

No, that's the way normies engage in flame wars.

>today is always friday

>wooow javascript has something perfectly normal and sane so weird
kys you're much much worse than her

Attached: 1527604885527.png (2492x1480, 1.3M)

find one that's not in it for womyn's equality bullshit or just to have a job
like my girl :D she's actually interested in it

what is this mutt language

>you're first mistake
>you're second mistake
>your third mistake
What the ever living fuck

C gets turned into assembly. What's your point?

You don't, it's dynamic, weak typing legacy braindeath that no modern code base uses because nothing is worse than not knowing what type your object is.

fe(male)

Attached: Df_lY0nW4AU0MRq.jpg (1454x1984, 366K)

Don't encourage his argument if you are trying to rebuke.

The coercion behind it is also absolutely fucking brain damaged.

>Twitter has a hard character limit, it's impossible to write syntactically correct programs that actually do anyth-
dwitter.net/

insecure neckbeard manlets itt

Attached: 28156408_174236883361026_8878465860675567616_n.jpg (817x817, 105K)

But when you read her tweet it will always be today; unless you somehow outside of the present. She needs to check to see if today is Friday, not if the user is a time traveller

By his neo-Jow Forums logic, every language but machine code is pointless, which is simply false.

What do you expect? Jow Forums consists mostly from a bunch of kissless faggots.

>post bait
>why is everyone replying to this bait?

Compile-time type checking can catch a lot of bugs.

>&& everywhere
>"My father is a Computer Scientists."
>that video of her drunkenly explaining how it's not even JavaScript it's her own made up language
God damn I'm laughing

>post bait
I'm not OP though.

>you will never be a woman
>you will never live a life so easy that all your problems involve your dumb errors

This changes everything!

Attached: 1526944408604.gif (276x232, 1.38M)

This has to be shooped

So it's not just her face that makes her look like a goblin.

>codingcommanders@4evauntamed The tallest is 6'11". I'm 4'11". No photo shop

muh dik

Why does anyone who unironically says "coding" always mean shit like
>if (thing == stuff) print("yay codering!);

Attached: 1523778062197.jpg (460x286, 124K)

>====
strict equality between floating point numbers

>=====
equality between memory addresses

>======
special equality for financial grade number comparisons

>=======
military grade comparison of results of additions and subtractions

>========
about as good as java's .equals but not quite

just use ======= bro it's easy lol just b urself and JS is like perfect and you're on the wrong???

That's the only way you can enforce type checking, normal logic operators can coerce your value to a different type and produce a false positive.

WHY THE FUCK ARE ALL OF HER SELFIES BLURRY
That said, short women are fucking sexy.

>(((g)))f

Give it a few years and "coding" will turn into a slang term to describe extremely poor quality programming by unqualified retards.

hue

read that lisp link

Oy vey, go back to sleep boyim

Attached: Shebrew.png (991x1260, 78K)

ayy

>Check on true

since i actually started devving as a job ive never heard anybody say code or programming unironically

its like %%% in c

>critisize a woman for seeking attention for something on social media while being incompitent at the thing she's seeking attention for
>You hate women.
Don't forget to tweet this thread at her, maybe she'll sleep with you as a reward for defending her.

Attached: x1qxGnX1dDoKvQQNfERpaSNbW_UY8E7tVnP883N0jsM.jpg (625x605, 103K)

When will (today === true) ever return false?
Is it not always today?

Maybe if you weren't such a nasty, negative person, you'd find someone to love you.

when we ran out of epoch

It should always return false, because it doesn't make any sense to store true or false in a variable named today.

wait did you reply to yourself?

I'm pretty old-school about things and I really don't see an issue with a woman attempting to program as long as she's not a cunt about it. I mean, I'd rather see a woman doing it, rather than a third world Pajeet.

>I really don't see an issue with a woman attempting to program as long as she's not a cunt about it.
>I don't really see an issue with a black guy attempting to do the taxes as long as he's white while doing them

White means ethnicity + culture. If negro manages to hold at least cultural part he can do taxes, sadly most of them cant.

Yeah, but... it'll just overflow and be 1979-01-01 0:00 or whatever epoch the system uses. Which would still be today, as far as it's concerned...

"Women" who can not-be cunts are barely female, if at all

I never said they weren't rare!

I'm fine with women learning to code too.

We're laughing at her for being shit and posting on social media about it. Look at her other posts like this one - this isn't the attitude of someone who wants to learn and master a skill, it's the attitude of someone who wants attention.

So most males are females, considering most males are cunts outside of the Jow Forums-loop?

wew