If(fork() == 0)

Zamasu, stop shitposting on U6 Jow Forums and go make my tea.

Attached: gowasu.jpg (1920x1080, 90K)

>This is the correct answer.
0 doesn't evaluate to true in any (sane) language kys

> forck
> Not fork
Is this Unix, brainlet edition

They are binary equivalent, there is absolutely no reason for them to not be considered equal.

Oh yeah, I forgot
0000 0000
is obviously not the same as
0000 0000

Attached: you.jpg (750x1000, 35K)

brainlet detected
no it's just bad spelling. the compiler will call it out.

it does, many dynamic languages only conside false and null/nil/... to be falsy

>not using superior switch(fork))

Shit, missed a (

if(fock().equalsTo(integer.create("0","0",false) == false);

who cares

int childorparent = fork();
if(childorparent < 1)

fuckin babbie-tier in this thread, i swear

>what is any unix shell

> what is unix shell
> what is an active low hardware port

>putting the == on the stack before the evaluation of fork()

Attached: 1514234475503.png (645x614, 83K)

if(!fork())
why do you think c evaluates int to boolean expression without warning/error?

Best language

fork

-arg1- -arg2- -arg3-

call

zerocase

if(fork())
;
else
//kode

condition = !fork()
trueOrFlase = condition ? 'true' : 'false'
if (Boolean(trueOrFalse) == !!0)

>implying fork() returns a boolean

>implying C has booleans

Justify your opinion.

This is the only non tard here

no

It is not possible to determine the language from the OP.

based and redpilled basedlad

>not having self documented code
if (forkFunctionReturnedZero())

forck is the British spelling.

if(String.valueOf(fork()).equals("0"))

if(String.valueOf(0).equals(String.valueOf(fork())))

if(String.valueOf(0).equals(String.valueOf(fork())) ? Boolean.valueOf("true") : Boolean.valueOf("false"))

Attached: 9c3e0ddc32dae8a96860408c0bf06fce.jpg (669x448, 146K)

Ejj matey stop there,do you have a license for that fork?

Attached: ACC-Alun-Thomas-A21I0469.jpg (3106x4659, 709K)

#define 0 true;

Attached: 1526757914655.png (3000x3000, 945K)

> implying integers can't set the zero flag

got a chuckle out of me

Attached: 1525803357766.png (360x594, 250K)

>what is _Bool

exit 0

Looks like english to me

it's obviously C.

Did not mess with fork too much but this makes the most sense to me in the thread.. especially after reading up on fork()...

Attached: 1477936822880.jpg (1064x567, 67K)

You mean Yoda should kill himself?

>//kode
cd..
cd. .
cd ..
cd
ls
cd..

>forck
>not forcke

Attached: 2CB706B2-6B7F-4801-AF76-5E4F71898181.jpg (606x540, 36K)

????
They're trying to see if it's equal to 0 in this case they can just do
>if (!fork())

>Fork function in C
>System call fork() is used to create processes. It takes no arguments and returns a process ID.

piece of shit

int pid = fork();
switch(pid) {
case -1:
perror("fork");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
case 0:
/* parent process */
default:
/* child process */
}

> not having a macro
> leFork()

#define true rand()

Attached: 1506788975099.jpg (182x183, 7K)

Not the type of fork().

he cute