/wt/ watch thread

This thread is about one of the oldest, most diverse, most iconic, and most significant technologies ever: timekeeping.

Attached: 4EB06B28-949F-4CD7-A28B-896026046F97.jpg (860x636, 227K)

Other urls found in this thread:

watchshop.com/mens-pulsar-watch-pxh565x1-p99934461.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_timekeeping_devices
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horology
youtube.com/watch?v=RFgGb1OunQI&t=25s
timelessluxwatches.com/reviews/not-just-quartz-grand-seiko-9f-movement/
watchesbysjx.com/2013/05/explained-seiko-9f-quartz-movements-definitive-proof-that-high-end-quartz-exists.html
amazon.com/dp/B00132UP22/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Daniel wellington and invicia is the pinicle of watchmaking, you cant prove me wrong

You are wrong.

dat lowest-tier bait bro. I'm sure you can do better.

Grand Seiko's 9F quartz is a doozy.

Attached: Grand Seiko 9F independent axis spacers.jpg (640x302, 66K)

Just ordered this watch. Did I make a mistake?
watchshop.com/mens-pulsar-watch-pxh565x1-p99934461.html

Attached: PXH565X1.jpg (800x800, 46K)

I'd like a watch that has a visible mechanism, like in OP, what would be a good option?

Look for watches that have "exhibition casebacks".
They have a crystal at the back through which you can see the movement, so you have to take off the watch to see it.

Don't get watches that show the movement through the front (dial side), most of them are cheesy.

Many thanks, that was what I was looking for

Reminder that watches with poor external finishing, likely extend their low standards to everything else about the watch as well.

Attached: rolex vs Grand Seiko.jpg (4345x1741, 1.14M)