Does this have any actual benefits over Linux?

Does this have any actual benefits over Linux?

Attached: hurd.jpg (666x160, 19K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/qtucUd9FauU?t=31s
groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/fa.linux.kernel/gHQADdVcPXo/zkhlC0WW9qYJ
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

youtu.be/qtucUd9FauU?t=31s

Many, but it's a piece of shit. Try Sculpt OS or Haiku OS. These are proper microkernels that are fast as fuck.

No.
All the benefits are purely theoretical and negated by the fact it's still x86_32-only and needs Linux drivers to barely work.

is it, dare I say, Linux/HURD ?

groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/fa.linux.kernel/gHQADdVcPXo/zkhlC0WW9qYJ
>Newsgroups: fa.linux.kernel
>From: "Theodore Ts'o"
>Subject: Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD
>Original-Message-ID:
>Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 02:57:11 GMT
>Message-ID:
>
>On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 04:03:55PM +0100, John Bradford wrote:
>> > Given that large chunks of HURD come from Linux, please refer to it as
>> > Linux/HURD.
>>
>> What HURD code comes from Linux? GNU/Mach uses code from Linux, but
>> not HURD as far as I know.
>
>As far as I know, HURD is using ext2fs code. It should definitely be
>called HURD/Linux. :-)
>
> - Ted

Kek

No.

It is GNU/Hurd.

fuck off stallman

Newer microkernel design.