Will Intel crush Nvidia and AMD with their dGPU?

kek no. People have no idea how much they have to put in their drivers to even begin running a fraction of all applications in a GPU.
We know nothing except Raja is there so he might be a real poo and give out AMD tech there illegally. We also don't know process. I think it's going to be DOA for 99% of users.

>implying it hasn't already
They have 2/3 of the GPU market right now.

Attached: JPR-GPU-Market-Share-Q4-2017.png (390x105, 6K)

>igpu and apu

The vast majority of people don't use it though. The only PCs that use the forced iGPU are laptops without a proper discrete card and office desktops. It's a literal placeholder meant only to provide the bare minimum to open up a youtube video or a word document, not in any way shape or form able to compete with a discrete GPU, or hell, even the AMD APUs, that completely dumpster it and compete with real discrete GPUs.
You're a moron, user.

i'm still amazed how Winter Solider managed to work at computer tech industry

how can they when they're facing bankruptcy?

Laptops, office desktops, HTPCs, any desktop not made for more than light gaming or workstation tasks. Modern iGPUs are suitable for poorfag tier gaming.

Nvidia's lead is too big.

Too early to tell. Having it done by 2020 sounds pretty aggressive. I'm sure they can leverage some existing know-how from their IGPs and it's likely they've had some work done already prior to their announcement.
They don't need to beat Nvidia, just get it to be price-competitive.. Hopefully they are developing with an eye towards ray-tracing.

Attached: 1494289777740.png (539x722, 290K)

Well I guess McDonald's dominates the toy market because they include millions of shit toys with their happy meals.

anyone remember larabee, and how they fucked project offset over?

No. They can't even do 10nm mass production in year 2018 and probably 2019.

Intel integrated GPUs are suitable for playing Half Life 2 at 30 fps. They're trash.

the mcdonalds gpu

Intel isn't facing bankruptsy.
That's LG, who invested in Intel's fab which has had 0 payoff for them.
LG is going to sue Intel for some sort of breach of contract, for sure. They can only hope their contract was actually good.
macroaxis.com/invest/ratio/39IB.L--Probability-Of-Bankruptcy

Attached: firefox_2018-07-05_21-25-41.png (1179x533, 83K)

You should check the part in the OP in which he talks about igpus, oh right, he doesn't, he's talking about dgpus

Oh wow, that was terrible investment. When did they even start? 10nm has been a shitshow for several years.

I can play 60fps modern games on my 8400 integrated

at gods holy resolution maybe

1080p, not every game is witcher 3

480x360 must give you tremendous eye strain.

>1x1080px
ok kid

Don't count on it. They tried this once before, it was called "Larrabee".

Still stuck on Sandy Bridge, huh

If only their 7nm has a good yield

Attached: Slide5.jpg (1208x680, 91K)

larrabee wasn't a gpu, it was a pci-based coprocessor. it only acts as a GPU through software emulation

is GF kill?

We do not know yet. By the way, Global Foundries are partners with IBM, they manufacture their fastest chips.

probably sounded like a great idea when Intel first started its R&D

>intel 7nm
>2020
>10nm scheduled for 2019
roight

>intel
>graphics
>now with extra poo
Now they can be shit both figuratively and literally!

Attached: 1503848584264.jpg (1000x1000, 253K)

you guys think Nvidia is this amazing company just because they sell the most expensive GPUs selling 100,000s 500-1000$ gpus isn't a big deal AMD and Intel have more of the mainstream market share.

intel will literally control things like DX13 adoption and Sm7.0 and will probably get their GPU in the next xbox even if intels hardware is slower than Nvidia they will be able to jew them on feature support and make people forced to buy the intel GPUs because they support things the Nvidia do not.

alot of you guys have only been in the gpu game for the last decade not much has changed in that time. But before 2009 top end GPUS that where released in 2008 where useless by the end of 2009 when blackops required Sm3.0 support. will happen again.

you guys have just been spoilt because every thing for the last decade has just worked and hasn't been made obsolete 1-2 years after you buy it. that happened all the time in the 2000s.

>will probably get their GPU in the next xbox
Intel != Microsoft, Microsoft won't adopt inferior hardware.

How many Palestinians does it take to screw in a lightbulb? None, because they spent all their money on rockets to impotently launch into Israel because they blame Israel for their own shortcomings, so they have no money for lightbulbs.

>intel will literally control things like DX13 adoption and Sm7.0 and will probably get their GPU in the next xbox even if intels hardware is slower than Nvidia they will be able to jew them on feature support and make people forced to buy the intel GPUs because they support things the Nvidia do not.
Novidia is a king of adopting latest and hottest proprietary shit tho. They do it with games, they do it with CUDA cores and they will do it with AI or whatever laters hottest shit will be out there. This is their shekels zone.

I have no idea. Hundreds of millions of dollars, probably starting around 5 years ago?

Apparently Intel has invested something like 20 billion total on its 10nm process.
That sounds like a lot, but some of these memory fabs cost 15-30 billion. But still, well, it is a lot.