should i use BIOS or UEFI when it comes to installing linux?
BIOS or UEFI?
Adrian Mitchell
Other urls found in this thread:
Daniel Sullivan
who cares if you're using shitty os lmao
Anthony Murphy
uefi
Ethan Morris
Learn to use Wikipedia and arch wiki, faggot.
Also, if your pc is less than 10 years old, UEFI.
David Cox
UEFI
Ryan Anderson
Uefi maximum bloated, only retards use it.
Jacob Gomez
use coreboot man, anything newer will be using uefi even if they claim to have a bios 'app' you can use.
If you dont care about a clean, potentially knowable, software foundation to all the rest of the shit that is bootstrapped up then just do whatever man its all good. Sleep well and brush your teeth is more important than a future where small provinces elect a tech bishops that vetos and maintains tech for their community and the wider distributed consensus layer
Henry Bennett
UEFI is pointless. Only good is if you want/need a system boot drive larger than 2TB (separate data only volumes can be any size you want, BIOS or UEFI, depends then on your os for how large a volume you can create). So for 2TB and under system/boot drives, a regular BIOS will suit you fine.
Nolan Green
BIOS is much easier to get working. It doesn't make a huge difference unless your boot drive is over 2TB.
Bentley Bell