Would it work
Would it work
Camden Hernandez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
Evan Perry
Extremely shitty viewing angle.
Charles Foster
Yes, it will also have 1/1000 the brightness of a regular 4K screen.
Nolan Harris
>
Jaxson Collins
That's basically projectors.
Charles Morales
People actually did this some time ago. But it's gonna be blurry.
Oliver Evans
why is the user so disgusting?
Aaron Davis
It's accurate.
Adam Richardson
>a giant magnifying glass somehow magically makes a 4k picture hover in midair
Anthony Myers
Yes, you can probably still buy fresnel lens kits on ebay.
This shit was the ghetto projector rage like 15 years ago.
Liam Carter
You can actually buy that, designed to be used with a smartphone for the screen.
I gave one as a (joke) birthday present once.
Never heard how terrible it was but I'm sure it's utter shit.
Thomas Morris
Brightness is determined by the amount of photons entering your eyes per second. If you had a tiny 4k screen that was magnified, either the 4k screen would produce the same amount of photons, making the energy savings useless, or it would produce less photons and the brightness would be darker, since you're just spacing the photons out more.
Also, the tiny screen would generate large amount of heat and would require extra cooling, reducing its efficiency.
Sebastian Edwards
"screen [arrow towards screen]"
are you more retarded than OP?
Colton Bennett
If you could
a. fix the loss of brightness from mangification
and b. fit the same resolution into the screen 1/1000th the size without it costing more than just using a regular sized screen
Nathan Green
Actually OP, now that I think about it, it would be far less expensive and efficient to produce a giant screen with large pixels, then use a magnifying lens to reduce its size.
Hunter Watson
Ethan Sanders
I lol'd
Hudson Lee
The image would but upside-down.
Easy to fix by turning the source image upside-down, but the drawing is wrong.
Jeremiah Anderson
Magnifying glass doesn't flip shit, does it?
Isaac Morgan
OP's image is more like a view camera.
It projects the image on a secondary screen.
Landon Watson
Yes projectors work
James Myers
Apparently no one on Jow Forums knows how a rear projection TV works.
> The absolute state of Jow Forums
Zachary Nguyen
/thread
Nicholas Nelson
Already done
Easton Hill
LOWRY
Oliver Hernandez
This is 7th grade physics
next
Ethan King
Except it does... Did you skip middle school physics, summerfag?
Jaxon Jenkins
Jaxon Clark
Only once you're past the focal point the image becomes inverted.
Cameron Thomas
예
Jackson King
It sort of does
Aiden King
they actually already make those, they're rear projection tv's, the method of projecting the image is different though, instead of using a small tv, they used an actual projecting lens
Henry Jenkins
that's exactly how those massive old rear-projection TVs worked, only with a tiny little CRT instead of an LCD panel
they produced a slightly fuzzy image, but overall they were pretty comfy, just insanely big and impossible to get in/out of rooms with small doorways
I remember helping my cousin move into his new house, the old occupant left one in the den because they couldn't be bothered getting it out
we had to take it apart to remove it from the room, so I can only assume it was brought in and assembled there in the first place
Lucas Walker
ITT: what it VR
Ryder Stewart
Congratulations, you just invented a projector.
Andrew Allen
Oliver Reyes
if you double the brightness you double the power draw, idiot. if you want it as bright as a 44" 4k tv itll have the same power draw, its just physics at this point