Arch vs. Debian Sid

Arch vs. Debian Sid.

Sound off!

Attached: suicide-booth-25c-new-year-new-me-haha-am-i-10318879(1).png (500x591, 100K)

NixOS

GuixSD

slack

+1

Maybe they didn't understand the question . . .

There was no question asked.

Attached: drool.png (320x226, 26K)

Neither, Debian stable.

- not rolling release.
- packages way too stale.

you say that like those are bad things

Attached: 1521238795663.png (597x594, 394K)

They are.

You ain't gonna notice if libwhateverthefuck is version 4.3 or version 4.5. If you just want to watch numbers go up, play an MMO. Stable distros let you spend your time using your machine instead of maintaining it.

>packages way too stale.
Never bothered me personally. Most of the stuff just works, I don't need always the newest version. Also I'm really degenerated from using windows for long time - if it works, don't fix it or you will screw up everything, which may actually apply to arch, so I'm still with debian stable.

What's with these cancerous captions? Where do they come from?
You see them everywhere attached to underageb& posts.
I thought it was twitter at first, but the type is different. Is it some social network app?

void

Void called.
They want their developer back.

Honey, we don't have time to go on vacation this summer, I have to upgrade to the new version of Debian stable.

No shit.

Used to run Debian stable. Never did have a version upgrade go right.

The font is the same that twitter uses, I think they just crop out the username.

Yeah nevermind then, it actually is the same font.

New year new me hahah amiright?

Brainlets have been posted on /sci/ last summer. Try again.