There is no reason to use any fs besides NTFS

and you can't prove me wrong

Attached: 17f.jpg (633x758, 178K)

Other urls found in this thread:

yourlogicalfallacyis.com/
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy-fallacy
github.com/maharmstone/btrfs
github.com/openzfsonwindows/ZFSin
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

ok

templeos doesn't support NTFS

Oh boy, fragmentation is surely the best feature. I love running unnecessary background processes just to keep my drive from slowing down. The extra read and writes from defragging definitely wouldn't make my drive lives shorter.

It's not open source. We don't know what lies beyond the edge of the observable [NTFS] universe.

Attached: Briandunning-HereBeDragons229.jpg (300x300, 63K)

lol at all those claims without any citation

You mean the OP?

Defrag brought to you by Microsoft.

(You)

Ntfs couldn't even transport files larger than 4gb on x86 and 8gb on x64. Meanwhile osx was unlimited. Also registry was a bad idea and shouldn't exist anymore