Are ramdisks the next SSD?

Attached: Capture.png (823x408, 181K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9CoAyjzJWfw
thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-970-pro-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-1tb-the-cost-of-being-the-worlds-best/3/
youtube.com/watch?v=D3-SqJHYzC0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Having a ramdisk without any form of internal battery to prevent massive data loss in case of critical failures.

Just buy a optane instead you nigger.

he fell for the 16GB RAMDisk RAM meme

raid adapters for m.2 SSDs exist you dipshits

Attached: 7553_53_samsung-950-pro-2-pcie-gen-3x4-nvme-ssd-raid-report.png (406x364, 183K)

With this kind of logic we should just put drives on the L1 cache!!!!!1!11!1

holy balls

Attached: Screenshot_2018-07-10-20-45-24.png (1280x720, 335K)

No.
These things are ancient news and will never be viable until RAM is $0.16/GB at least.

>Barely 1GB/s write and slightly over 2GB/s read performance on non-sequential storage
Useful for dumping things INTO memory, not even comparable to a RAMdisk

>Ram disk
>micro sd raid
>some other thing on the left
The fuck is that card?

You DO know that's just 4x nvme raid 0, right? Threadripper has supported 8x nvme raid 0 for a while now and we could see 16x nvme raid 0 in future threadripper successors.

youtube.com/watch?v=9CoAyjzJWfw

Not that anyone would do something this stupid anyway, i'd probably just improve load times by like 100ms at this point from 1x nvme.

Attached: DELID.png (2518x1024, 468K)

Aside from the absolutely heinous cost of putting together an 8x NVME RAID 0, and then the absolute lack of security of using RAID 0 nonvolatile storage as a rapid data point (which means frequent offloading from one storage point to another, which means tying up disk access, which...etc you get the point), the issue isn't really "It's only 4x", it's more "that's very impractical"
A single PCIe SSD is great because its just a drop-and-go procedure, no RAID bullshit, just really really fast storage. But it's still nothing compared to keeping things floating in RAM.
Tying that storage to extend RAM is a huge system clusterfuck and a giant pain in the ass, so it's only valuable for sustained, large, one-time-pull-or-push operations.
People working with these sized data sets are not doing that, they're making a whole ballfuck of large sized random read/write operations.

Why else do you think database servers always have 10 kajillion GB of RAM? Just load database records into memory and persist them for updates or idempotent operations and only release them after X many seconds.
Optane is unironically the best fit for "really big really fast memory pool".

I don't understand this optane meme. Wouldn't it just be better to wait for faster m.2 SSDs with better processors and controllers? Also isn't the samshit 970 pro already faster than this optane meme trash?

You're gonna have to raid 0 that shit anyway regardless if you want ramdisk breakneck speeds.

thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-970-pro-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-1tb-the-cost-of-being-the-worlds-best/3/

Attached: Samsung-970-Pro-1TB-NVMe-SSD-Crystal-DiskMark.jpg (1049x953, 563K)

based

the microsd cards are probably for power loss backup
the thing on the left is clearly a battery

That shit isn't used to speed some caché operations on ZFS systems?

>RAMdisks
Haven't seen these since the Quake 3 era when mechanical disks sucked, RAID still required a board, and people were desperate to boost their load times in online gaming. The few consumer grade ramdisk boards were kind of janky, but not to pricey. They never caught on. Now we have SSDs, why bother?

Attached: 1332608259244.jpg (406x364, 109K)

>tfw going 6-way bootable NVMe RAID0 on my Threadripper
>mfw also installing 2990x when it drops
>tfw 2 second Windows boot times

Attached: 1305309033136.jpg (500x479, 70K)

>why bother?
Yeah, I'm not sure what the point of the OP is. All RAMdisks are software based now.

I want to buy an Optane but without having to dump massive amounts of money into a CPU chipset and architecture that supports it.
Making a router build with Optane jumps the price from ~$100-200 all the fuckin' way to $800.

>JUST buy intel goyim
how about no

Attached: download.png (208x243, 13K)

>optane meme
Intel employs a lot of shills to sit on Jow Forums shilling their useless overpriced products

Samsung > Intel
AMD > Intel
Qualcomm > Intel
TPlink > Intel
Nvidia > Intel

Attached: 1496069985516.png (357x330, 126K)

>4 disk raid 0
lmao. Fast, until it isn't.

Attached: insanity.jpg (4011x2100, 3.73M)

> Watching LTT
> kys

Attached: IMG_20180710_231226.png (389x354, 57K)

>i dont understand what latency is, only bandwidth
stay retarded user

does it really matter at this point? with nvme ssds we're pretty much starting to hit diminishing returns

That's what the rectangle is right? Looks like a surplus phone battery.

ram disks are soooo 2008 tier

Not really
>Pros
Fast as fuck
>Cons
No long-term storage
More expensive than SSDs
PCI-E lane limitations

Just remember, if that battery dies, you're FUCKED

Anyone played with StoreMI yet?

adoredtv did a pretty indepth video on them a while back youtube.com/watch?v=D3-SqJHYzC0

>that review includes the specs of the computer under test, including the... mousepad
serious chuckle

Attached: Capture.png (800x640, 51K)

>Nvidia > Intel
can confirm using Novidia CPU's all time

Are you fucking retarded? Optane disks are meant to have extremely low latency, not to be the fastest, they're a very nice cache storage

RAMdisks have been a thing for decades, silly OP.

I had a PCI RAM disk with DDR SDRAM back in the day, around early 2000's.
Cheaper than the SSDs we had at the time, just plug in all your unused memory.

It's funny to see people think RAM disks and SSDs are a new invention.