Why are iPhone cameras such a joke?

Attached: 1499902586823.png (614x878, 671K)

I actually prefer the iPhone on this one

I mean yeah apple sucks, but if you actually care about picture quality you're not going to be using a phone camera. Also considering that normies only take pictures to post on instagram which compresses the shit out of them anyway.

>aggressive noise reduction

At ISO 64?

your a joke

it's called super-resolution and it is applied by every manufacturer when phone has a small sensor so it reaches an artificial "high resolution"

images are taken and converted by an algorithm in real time

if the algorithm is shit, this "painting" effect is prevalent, something apple never cared to fix because its consumers either like it or don't notice it.

All phone sensors are too small to take any pic above 8MP without super resolution techniques

Yes, that's what happens when you use extremely tiny sensors.

Attached: Sensors-size-01-01.jpg (1351x695, 208K)

>$100 phone
>$1000 phone
>$150 phone
Hmmm.

Attached: 1519589790501.png (612x874, 654K)

ps. You can emulate that effect by zooming in with digital zoom on a camera and then taking a photo

This is the way "reviewers" that are paid by companies exploit the shills and drive the market.

Stop giving them that ground you normie ass fuckers.

There is no such thing as "premium" tech. You act like a stupid part of women does with handbags.

I thought iPhones had the best cameras.

>Judging image quality by thumbnails
Ishygddt

The Lumia 1020 doesn't have this problem.

Attached: 1515900465634.png (1024x1024, 59K)

They do with people, not with close objects that no one takes pictures of.

Wjy do you care about picture quality? My phone has a decent enough camera so you can tell what is in the picture. If I want to get great shots I take my k-1 with me

>t. assblasted iToddler

cy9cjdi chickndi shit is surpocisingly good.

Attached: lg bts.jpg (1080x607, 66K)

>it makes roasties look better because it blurs out all their wrinkles!
LMAO @ UR LYFE

>iPhones are optimized for narcissism
Makes sense

Unironically. iToddlers WANT their camera to be shit.

This, people that give half a shit about image quality own cameras.

second ps.

OP kindly step off this stupid thread because you killed a much better one

Your bs is not technology, whatever company it is mocking

Please ask an advertising board from the new moot, so you guys can fiddle with your tiny pathetic consumerist dicks there.

You literally ruin every single board and it's not summer-only.

Who fucking cares if some dork pays 1000 dollars for a piece of shit

They do it for the same reason you pay 0 dollars and mock them

Your stupid threads won't change normies and cameras and they have nothing to do with tech, cause you don't care to discuss how this shit works, on the contrary, you sperg over stuff you don't know and talk about money

This is
faggotry

Why? It looks like shit.

This pic shows why Samsung wins close up, because they blur shit to hell and back!

With the iPhone X you can see facial details that you can't with the Samsung.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 118K)

iphone dosn't have best anything

Who cares about phone cameras
If you wanna take pictures get a real camera

iToddlers will defend this.

Jow Forums needs to be dissolved and sent to Jow Forums because it's 99% consumerist bullshit.

My posts explains it clearly, and I don't care what phone has the problem and whatnot. 5 pixels is enough for anything 5 feet close to you. Anything further than that is just you trying too much to snap a moment instead of living it.

>zooms the fuck in on a nut hair
>woooow terrible camera! itoddlers btfo

Come on now. The fact that you are utterly losing your mind over this means you KNOW that Apple makes the best phones and you are trying desperately to shill.

>inb4 pixels mockery

Megapixels

While you make some valid points, I ultimately have to agree with

what is wrong with you, you fucking autist
your spacing gave my mother siphilis, please stop posting on this website

Attached: 1464300516119.png (1219x686, 713K)

are apple users obsessed with the texture of faces?

It is just a law of optics thing. You can't optimize for close up shots of gumbands and for medium distance face shots. Apple cares more about the later and so do most people.

You should look into the definition of autism if it

only

takes

some

spacing

to

trigger

you

>posts anime picture to validate stupid opinion
>will defend it by saying this was originally an anime website and "muh reddit killed it"

a stands for autist :^)

Hmm...

Attached: 1505082800847.png (613x593, 450K)

pxiel 2 is still the king though, p20 pro is a smoothed out pos.

Holy fuck, you burned this poor motherfucker ()

>iphones are so fucking shit, their sensor cant even detect you're trying to take a macro shot
>something that $50 point and shoot cameras could do for over a decade

Attached: 1517137649622.gif (500x384, 290K)

Even normlords have pictures that aren't of people. If all your photos are of people you're an autistic creepy freak

wat? it's as bad as all the others
if you take a good image and 50% jpeg compress it, you get iphone quality

*SNAP*

show pixel 2 one
or oneplus 6

>the sensor detects anything by itself

See? That's why these threads don't belong in tech boards: you don't even have a clue of how these things work

You're here to kill threads over how your office crush of 4 years that bangs chads spent her money and it disgusted you :')

I tried.

Attached: 1507542664223.jpg (613x593, 54K)

BTFO

>has no way to defend themselves
>angrily sperging single word memes they pulled from their discord server

are you implying this is the proper way to space shit, phoneposter
just fucking space properly and stop being a retarded redditor

different points go in different paragraphs, it's not that difficult and spares us all an unpleasant view
now kill yourself for that obvious samefag

I don't need to. No one buys those phones.

>iphone
>literally worse than 50% jpeg
Can't make this shit up.

Attached: 1509936264086.gif (250x230, 927K)

This is not really the most interesting comparison. Post some landscapes and cityscapes.

Now at 25% jpeg.

Attached: 1514780975710.jpg (613x593, 33K)

>what is a samefag
>you have to choose my type of computer to be acceptable
>I stress over spacing on a website that is so casual it actually accepts my autism

>t.
(as in complete noone)

loool maybe it's 25% then

>no one buys chink phones

the fuck?

I guess brighten it up or "sharpen" it and then compress to like 20% would give the effect

I'm sure it's "sharpened" and "brightened" by default to look better to normies

It's not narcissism if you take pictures of other people

Now at 10% jpeg.

Attached: 1511729993516.jpg (613x593, 24K)

It's just zoomed in, ambience is 50% stronger and all the voxels pop up

Shameless paid reviewer shilling

Not an Apple fan

also it does not have apps.

0% jpeg.

Attached: 1518674639353.jpg (613x593, 19K)

How often do you take selfies with your back camera -that is discussed in this thread- you dumbo?

are you sure you know how to use jpeg correctly?

Attached: Screenshot_20180711_184116.png (863x688, 168K)

I'm sorry Photoshop isn't as garbage as GIMP.

>1/50s on the S9
Holy fuck enjoy your blur my man, that's way too slow for anyone who isn't a statue.

>it's gimp's fault photoshop implements algorithms the wrong way so they are "artist/fool-proof"

ohoho matey!

>it's Adobe's fault they can produce a somewhat passable 19KB image while GIMP spews out complete shit at 15KB
Ok kid.

file size and data size in photoshop doesn't decrease after 15% which is proof they're doing the algorithm wrong.

Still looks better than iPhone at 100% PNG tbhfam.

>phone cameras are hot garbage

This. A proper camera needs a bigger sensor and optics. You can't cheat physics much.

>24 KB
>19 KB

kys retard

ITODDLERS

B

T

F

O

How will iToddlers EVER recover?

they get away with having poor cameras because their front camera is better optimized on social media apps (specifically snapchat) and that's all normies care about

>open it in my own photoshop to look at results
>doesn't change

kys retard

>Calls someone a kid to validate his own opinion on something as unimportant as image size in the era of gigabytes and half gig internet speeds

You are closer to a kid for still using JPG and not optimized PNG and tiff for everything

Attached: 1505151929773.png (614x878, 664K)

>different zoom levels in every pic because the shill can't remember how they fucked up the picture last time

Attached: 1507973984309.png (612x878, 665K)

>iso below 50
>phone cameras

okay, definitely

...

...

iToddlers have defended this.

...

Who the fuck uses ISO 64 and 1/100s?

iToddlers have defended this.

>t. Assblasted itoddler

iTODDLERS ON SUICIDE WATCH

Attached: 1524679604598.jpg (1920x1080, 750K)

Is it a joke? One is obviously closer than the other.