JUST

millennials deserve no rest

Attached: 1503922472110.jpg (310x310, 39K)

>It's a fair trade-off for most
Literally "and it's a good thing!"

>That's one of the few reasons I use firefox
So you use Firefox for a feature it doesn't have? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

>no firefox open
>~500mbs of ram
>10 tabs open
>~2gbs of ram
>20 tabs
>~4gbs of ram
>close firefox
>~500mbs of ram

Attached: 1525405944086.jpg (962x1024, 102K)

Why don't you just take your RAM out of your computer and through it in the trash if you don't want to use it?

It's hard to use 32gbs of ram

Holy shit, is this what has been causing Chrome to lag recently?
Occasionally scrolling and interactive elements (e.g. 4chanX image hover) just become laggy as fuck for like 30 seconds and then it goes back to normal. Anyone else experience this?

>he can't into about:config

Attached: 1520722665020-g.png (709x861, 733K)

you're retarded

Attached: file.png (877x436, 31K)

Maybe not call people retarded when you're the retard. First-party isolation and site isolation are NOT the same thing. First-party isolation means that a website can only access data from its own domain whereas site isolation isolates each domain in a separate process.

Chrome's site isolation is not the same as Firefox's. They're completely different concepts.

this is the kind of shit Linus Torvalds hates so much. doubling memory usage for a security measure means breaking user experience, and, unless it's a temporary measure, it's absolutely fucked up

>what are containers
Fx it's quite ahead of Chrome on isolating websites without going full retard and separating every site on it's own process

10-20% is double now?

it doubled for me

Still different concepts. Containers and first-party isolation deals with cross-site tracking whereas process isolation deals with security. For obvious reasons Chrome isn't going to implement something that breaks cross-site tracking...

Attached: edited.png (832x780, 469K)

Good fucking god, thank you user.

Attached: 178 - gZxXLBR.jpg (499x499, 48K)

>he thinks chrome has not always taken up more than half your memory
and was ever secure

Attached: tenor.gif (220x172, 240K)

Unused memory is wasted memory. The only reason why you should care that chrome uses too much RAM is if you need RAM for something else.

You probably just shit post all day, so I'm guessing you're not actually doing anything else

Attached: image-1.jpg (280x400, 37K)

>recently

you call since circa 2012 "recent" ?

Attached: absolutly designated1.jpg (1247x801, 122K)

i need the ram to cache my seeding files user

BASED

Attached: 1487826529173.png (233x221, 123K)

huh? it's not enough to update your bios and os?

Several things can be updated to prevent it. I'm sure what this is referencing is using Chrome as an attack Vector on unpatched systems

>meltdown and spectre safeguards
disable javascript

so it's going to be using more ram for no reason? is firefox affected?

I doubt you disable everything on every site

Firefox was the first browser to put out a patch

i disable javascript for recaptcha

fuck. Can you disable it?

There's no way your WAN speeds are faster than a HDD let alone a SSD so this makes no fucking sense.

came here to do this

Attached: picunrelated (2).jpg (1024x662, 96K)

Again, I doubt you disable all js on every site

MEMES

window uses all spare memory to cache the file system

>uses all spare memory
No it doesn't

Attached: who's laughing now?.png (620x665, 19K)

how much did that cost you? in hours of wagecucking

>goto about:config
>type "privacy.firstparty.isolate"
>set it to true

source: privacytools.io/#about_config

Attached: 2016 bitch.png (561x107, 7K)

>buying Intel

wow, price went up so much, you should sell it before China tanks the market

NoJS'ers don't have any of these problems.

I don't just disable it
I run A53 quad core that isn't even susceptible to meltdown/spectre
My major complaint is that Brave isn't available on ARM Linux

enjoy your getting plox

but i only browse Jow Forums

Well it was certainly fine before.

>Linus "lol just don't visit shady sites degenerate" Torvalds

>and that's a good thing!

Yeah, who the fuck uses their computer for more than one process? What is this, the '80s or something?

>whereas process isolation deals with security
Separating each site into separate processes still won't protect against memory-timing attacks if the OS decides to place them on the same physical core for hyperthreading.

Noscript still disables everything, right?

how come there haven't been any cases where meltdown or spectre has been exploited? There have to be millions of devices out there that are never going to get updated. Hell Asus is the only motherboard manufacturer that even released an update for the spectre v4 vulnerability.

People act like the instant your browser is opened you will be fucked.

>there haven't been any cases where meltdown or spectre has been exploited
[Citation Needed]

If it was as bad as people said it was there would be non stop news of people getting hacked all the time.

Because the push to get people to install new BIOS/UEFI updates isn't about protecting anyone, it's about installing even more backdoors into machines so more spying can take place.

Don't you people understand anything?

now that actually makes sense.

KEK here's your (you)