I know that Kode with Klossy is/was a coding boot camp thing, but are there tutorials or webinars available too?
I have a very rudimentary knowledge of programming so I'd like to sincerely try learning through the program. I'm curious how much Ruby or Python or whatever I'd actually learn.
does this still exist two years later or are we beating a dead horse
Kayden Butler
Looks like it might be dead. The most recent news updates on the site are from Dec 2016. I guess I'll never find out the quality of her courses.
Luis Butler
how come everyone that replied is a taylor swift fan?
Kayden Williams
Get freebasic, fuck around with it until you can do the fuck you want, then learn C. Programming you only learn if you treat it as some sort of very autistic game.
>make a tech event >have no clue what the fuck you're actually doing >you're not even ashamed to show what a fucking clueless asshat your are >it still counts because ???
When did this become a thing? Why aren't people laughing about a farce like this?
kek, you think that learning code matters. They probabil got a decent job by playing with fingers in hair... The company accepted them just because the HR think productivity grow with beautiful females at work or some bullshit and because they knew the basics.
you can absolutely return from inside a condition block. the girls code here is shit but it's better than the guy's. at least with the girls code i don't have to find a copy of the IEEE-whatever floating point standard to understand it. fast inverse sqrt is a total hack for low to moderate performance gains. between shit code and a shittier hack, both are unacceptable losers.
Camden Price
Since its inside conditional statements, they might not be read by the compiler, and since you can't have non-void functions without returns it will result in error
Lincoln Diaz
that's only true for preprocessor conditions, though.
Cameron Long
>girl
Ahahaha
Ayden Jackson
Retard
Cameron Gray
Where is her tits? I can't see them at all
Evan Adams
>the hard way series is bretty gud L O L
Brandon Jenkins
>thinking the fast inverse square root is good code >calling other people retards try compiling it on a machine with a modern sse instruction set and see how well it works, you faggot.
some people like it, some hate it. i don't really think it's a good way to learn personally, that's why i used spurdo-speak. but i figured if i'm giving links to OP i might as well include it, as a lot other people have claimed it helped them learn.
Cameron Thomas
There are tutorials on YouTube for what you're looking for friendo, try Socratica.
Jacob Martinez
>Take old code that was immensely useful >Use in modern systems that it wasn't designed for >"This code is shit"
Can you just fuck off back to /v/? Nobody wants you here.
Eli Gray
>13 lines for a max function This fucking baboon in heels.
>code stop calling it code, it's a fragile hack that only worked on certain systems in its own time. >immensely useful it was used primarily for calculating light reflection in video games, i wouldn't call that immensely useful. even in cases where it might have been used elsewhere the performance benefits are massively overstated. >Can you just fuck off back to /v/? the irony of (you) saying this to anybody is incredible.
Noah Fisher
>>code >stop calling it code, it's a fragile hack that only worked on certain systems in its own time. I was representing your train of thought, not mine.
>>immensely useful >it was used primarily for calculating light reflection in video games, i wouldn't call that immensely useful. even in cases where it might have been used elsewhere the performance benefits are massively overstated.
Yeah, lighting isn't important at all for 3d scenes. Let's just scrap all 3d applications cause mah vidya meme.
>>Can you just fuck off back to /v/? >the irony of (you) saying this to anybody is incredible.
Your personality reflects exactly what a faggot from /v/ would be like. Critisizing someone significantly smarter and more successful than you because you took a CS class as a freshman.
Once again fuck off.
Nolan Morris
>that excludes a==b
Yeah because (a > b) does not excludes a==b right?
Caleb Fisher
Not his one actually. But he used it in quake indeed.
Asher Roberts
It's only not read by the compiler if the value you're comparing it against is the same already and mostly only on else statements.
if (1 == 1) { doShit(); return 0; else { doSomeOtherShit(); // compiler will skip this because 1 is always equals to 1 return 0; }
It pretty much depends on what you're telling the computer to do and how the compiler interprets it.
tl;dr it's perfectly ok to use returns in conditional statements.
Juan Gomez
yeah. there's >= and
Jaxon Collins
They are a waste of time. I did really well in a "rigorous" R class and I hate coding and can't remember a thing. I am also dyslexic and shouldn't be able to code to begin with. I also did jack shit in the class. I guess I wanted to do well. Anyways, coding, real coding, not copying other people's work copy/paste until it works, is a valuable skill that should be respected. I'll only ever care what you can build originally, and coding camps and classes are basically bullshit.
Josiah Taylor
It's just a "seminar" to collect money from NGOs. It's a common scheme. Like charities that "raise awareness".