Phoneposters

LOOK AT THE IMAGE dipshit.

My secondary point is many people browse on desktops/laptops AS WELL as phones so it is showing one user with two sessions and implying its entirely an influx of new posters.

It isn't counting individual people, you fucking retard.

Literally this. The only reason that there is more mobile users is that because chink phones and tablets became popular
How the fuck are you combine someone who browses Jow Forums on linux desktop with his wired connection and galaxy s8 with mobile internet while shitting? They are separated.

>dumb phone posters

Incorrect to say that if it is a user on multiple sessions dumb fuck and the image incorrectly distinguished between laptops and desktops. The image is one of the biggest shitfag alerts I see posted.

>iPhone fags not being able to view webms
Agree with everything you say, but you can view webms on iPhone if you have VLC installed

All false for me

Who gives a fuck if laptops and desktops are indistinguishable? I never even mentioned anything about using Jow Forums on a laptop. It doesn't count as phoneposting and I never criticized it.

Online sessions minus desktop sessions = phoneposters. The gap is clearly widening. Your "multiple sessions" spergout doesn't mean a fucking thing.

Oh my god are you this illiterate? Read. the. Op. Image.

further, like I said a million times. Nearly every "phoneposter" is a multi session poster. The same fucking users on a phone that you're sperging about are also "desktop" posters.

If you weren't a newfag you'd be talking about the 09, 10 ~ influx but since you're likely a part of that crowd or newer you don't.

But that's wrong. There are also tablets and it's not some kind of obscure device. Majority of people who uses them are using them interchangeable with phones, so those people will be counted as 3 separate sessions.

The newfags are all the Boomer, zoomer, wojack and pepe posters who think they are funny or interesting by posting a meme that's popular.

Literally arrow in the knee tier.

you need to go back

This. Holy shit.

>phoneposters
Let's see how this applies to me
>>most likely underaged
False
>>most likely from reddit (the fappening, gamergate and r/t_d influx)
False (the other way around, actually)
>>inability to create original content
Mostly true
>>more likely to disappear during the thread, thus leaving discussions unfinished
False. Mobile clients have push notifications (unless it's Russian shit like dashchan), so you are getting a notification when someone answers even in some long forgotten thread.
As a result, you are more likely to finish the conversation on mobile.
>>links to mobile sites
False.
>>ban evaders
False.
>>lower WPM thus favouring an aversion to more detailed and thought-out posts
As you can see right now, False.
>>probably skip over long posts too due to smaller screen
False. Text-reflow is a thing, you know.
>>screen size and touch UI can make more dexterous tasks such as multiquoting more difficult
True.
>>iPhone fags not being able to view webms
Don't know.
>>inability to name files which is one of the many avenues of creating a funny post on Jow Forums
False. You can rename any file on Android device.

8/11 are false. Better luck next time.

Why what a load of shit o I only use the mobile because of easier shit posting and clover dev blocking recraptcha with forced noscript and dynamic I to get around mod autism
I've been posting on /b/ since 2006 and sometimes dual shitpost on the desktop laptop mobile and even fucken out my ass faggg

Attached: 1532300000895.jpg (480x360, 12K)

That doesn't fucking mean anything you dense cunt.

The gap between desktop and mobile sessions is widening. Undisputable fact.

The gap is widening because less people are registering ONLY desktop sessions or BOTH desktop AND mobile sessions.

It means everything you fucking idiot.
>more people get smartphones and tablets
>there are more sessions using said devices

Astonishing right?

You cannot know if someone is doing only one or both because there isn't a distinction made. How stupid are you? The odds are with how pretty much fucking everyone has a smartphone that it is dual session single user.

>more people get smartphones and tablets
>there are more sessions using said devices
This is all that matters and the picture in the OP shows exactly that. Dual session single users are cancer because they phonepost and their phoneposting sessions register as precisely that. It's fucking simple.

More people owning smartphones doesn't excuse the shortcomings of phoneposting you fucking moron. What a shitty "argument".

Ah yes, I sure love bringing my desktop to work so I can shitpost on an anonymous zimbabwean spear-hunting board. God forbid I use my phone for that and turn into a normie.

So the same users that browse via desktop who also browse via phone are now a problem? That is almost fucking everyone genius.

50/50 phone - desktop browser here
>most likely underaged
I'm 22
>most likely from reddit (the fappening, gamergate and r/t_d influx)
never went to reddit at all, I don't watch the jew-porn, gamergate was culturally significant so you can't brush it off as just a normie attraction.
>inability to create original content
why is that ? do you mean no access to MS paint ?
>more likely to disappear during the thread, thus leaving discussions unfinished
everyone is 100% likely to fuck off a thread after not getting a response for a while, threads die, that's life
>links to mobile sites
and you can't visit them on your thinkpad ?
>ban evaders
I'm not a pedo, I don't post CP
>lower WPM thus favouring an aversion to more detailed and thought-out posts
which is, good ? it leaves the more in depth threads for the people who are more involved in the discussion
>probably skip over long posts too due to smaller screen
If they can be on their phones for hours on end I don't see why reading text would be an issue
>screen size and touch UI can make more dexterous tasks such as multiquoting more difficult
I guess, more dexterous, not impossible
>iPhone fags not being able to view webms
ifags don't belong in here anyways
>inability to name files which is one of the many avenues of creating a funny post on Jow Forums
exclusive to ifags, I can easily rename files on my android phone

Yes, everyone who registers phoneposting sessions is a problem.

Looks like you're finally beginning to understand, genius. Your whole spergout about dual sessions was fucking pointless and I was trying to explain that to you. Jesus Christ.

Can someone explain what this whole gamergate thing is about? Is that website? Did zoomers flood from there?

Oh boy I love post 2010 cancerous niggers calling me the problem

Attached: ff.jpg (1080x1313, 287K)

>shortcomings
>implying even without phones 99% of posts on Jow Forums weren't oneliners.
>implying webm is even remotely important
>implying mobile ips aren't banned in their majority
>implying majority of desktop users aren't skipping over walls of text
>implying someone renames images except for one random autist out of 1000
>implying mobile sites are a problem when you can simply remove m. Or is that too much of a dextrous tasks for you?
>implying multiquoting is hard
>implying oc isn't made by minority of users
Literally nothing in op post even remotely a thing. There is no such thing as a mythical average desktop user who is making thought-out posts and posts OC in every second post.

That face when you have never browsed Jow Forums on the phone. I cant imagine how shitty and uncomfortable it must be

there is literally nothing wrong with reddit.

Pretty comfy, actually. I'd even argue that it's more convenient due to notifications and multiple Imageboard support.

Attached: Screenshot_20180723-114406.png (1080x1920, 309K)

all the apps are garbage and typing on a phone is a pain though

Someone made a twitter(?) posts about sjw indie game-dev who slept with a game journalist(or was he her bf?) for good reviews about her (stolen) game and somehow it has became a problem about white straight gamers. And for some reason it was Jow Forums fault.

nice backtracking

imagine spending that much effort trying to argue a point that didn't even fucking matter, despite being told numerous times that it didn't matter, only to realise you fucked up and thus resulting in you throwing ad-homs and making a wild guess that I started coming here after 2010

>implying even without phones 99% of posts on Jow Forums weren't oneliners.
99% of posts aren't one-liners. I have no doubt that people typing on their phones can't be fucked putting in as much effort as someone with a laptop in front of them .
>implying webm is even remotely important
They are remotely important. I, and many others, view and post them all the time on Jow Forums.
>implying mobile ips aren't banned in their majority
proof
>implying majority of desktop users aren't skipping over walls of text
not at the same rate as phoneposters
>implying someone renames images except for one random autist out of 1000
I bet that autist isn't a phoneposter.
>implying mobile sites are a problem when you can simply remove m. Or is that too much of a dextrous tasks for you?
that's more annoying than not having to remove it
>implying multiquoting is hard
it's harder on a mobile with less screen real estate
>implying oc isn't made by minority of users
I never said anything about minority or majority. I bet you more OC is made by people on desktops and laptops, though

based

these things exist on desktop too

Can confirm. My IQ drops by 30 points whenever I'm on my android phone.

>t. laptop poster

>Read the OP image
You're the illiterate one, the "desktop+mobile" counts normal desktop usage, it's there to allow the comparison, if it wasn't there the phoneposters would be barely above desktop.
To make it clear, desktop+mobile is all site usage. Desktop only is to separate the desktop chunk from mobile chunk on the graph.

>these things exist on desktop too
Not really. On desktop you have to keep all the threads open in tabs to see if there are any answers. With mobile I can turn the screen off completely and get notification when there are new posts without actively checking, which is pretty convenient.

Plus, the layout is better and it's easier to follow particular conversations in a thread, since they don't disappear when you move the cursor away.

Only downside I see is that Overchan doesn't select code in any way, which may be annoying on Jow Forums.

Attached: Screenshot_20180723-120345.png (1080x1920, 329K)

>>ban evaders
But my roaming ip is banned here in like 20 parts of town.

Except it does.
It does that by showing events on the graph, See: fappening, gamergate, election.
If it was actually just the natural increase of smartphones you would be expecting a linear curve, not massive bumps at large events.

>On desktop you have to keep all the threads open in tabs to see if there are any answers
>what is thread watcher
>easier to follow particular conversations in a thread, since they don't disappear when you move the cursor away.
>what is quote inlining/threading

He, for some reason, thought that if you post on your phone, yet you also browse on a desktop, that it somehow makes phoneposting no longer a bad thing. I think he finally gets it now that all phoneposting sessions are bad and that also using a desktop doesn't excuse it. It took a while, though.

>Not really. On desktop you have to keep all the threads open in tabs to see if there are any answers. With mobile I can turn the screen off completely and get notification when there are new posts without actively checking, which is pretty convenient.
Okay. Keeping tabs open doesn't really inconvenience me in any way but I see your point.
>since they don't disappear when you move the cursor away
can do this on a desktop though

I think the image was more to show the influx of redditors but the bump does reflect a surge in phoneposting sessions.

Looking at where desktop users intersects 50M during the 2016 election, there are ~100M sessions all up, meaning there were 50M phoneposting sessions. Go to the very end of the graph, you get about ~140M minus ~60M, which leaves about 80M phoneposters. So you've gone from about 50% of sessions being phoneposters to about 57% of sessions being phoneposters just ~6 months later.

>99% of posts aren't one-liners
They are. Just a single short sentence. Don't delude yourself into thinking otherwise. 99% of posts always where >implying something, calling someone a nigger or a reaction picture with a smug anime girl
>They are remotely important. I, and many others, view and post them all the time on Jow Forums.
And how the fuck you know that desktop users are even remotely interested in your webms? How the fuck is your webms even remotely important?
>not at the same rate as phoneposters
It doesn't matter.
>I bet that autist isn't a phoneposter.
It still doesn't change the fact majority of desktop users aren't renaming.
>that's more annoying than not having to remove it
But it's not? Also, majority of websites are redirecting users to destop version by user-agent. Youtube are not afaik, but who the fuck cares when 4chanx embeds it anyway?
>it's harder on a mobile with less screen real estate
But it itsn't? I mean, it's harder, but it so easy anyway, so why bother differentiating? That's like saying that those who drinks 0.5l cola are retards because 0.33l is lighter.
>I never said anything about minority or majority. I bet you more OC is made by people on desktops and laptops, though
But it still doesn't matter. It such a overwhelming minority that it simply stupid to use it as an argument. I'm talking about real OC, not about some pol-tier twitter screenshot or anime screenshot cutout.

Don't forget mobilefags are more likely to shitpost and if they do shitpost even harder than desktop anons. Mobilefags ruin threads.

>ban phoneposters.
>delete Jow Forums
>???
>PROFIT

>phoneposters
>>most likely underaged
28
>>most likely from reddit (the fappening, gamergate and r/t_d influx)
Since 06, remember EFG, grinman, etc? Fag
>>inability to create original content
Nigger reposting shit has always been a thinh
>>more likely to disappear during the thread, thus leaving discussions unfinished
Some of us are wagecucking and don't monitor a thread for 5 hours
>>links to mobile sites
>implying desktop mode doesn't exist
>>ban evaders
Yeah because people only started evading when smartphones appeared, right?
>>lower WPM thus favouring an aversion to more detailed and thought-out posts
Like your thousand word essay here?
>>probably skip over long posts too due to smaller screen
Not when OP green texts from ten lines
>>screen size and touch UI can make more dexterous tasks such as multiquoting more difficult
Clover doesn't have this problem
>>iPhone fags not being able to view webms
iFags belong in the gas chamber
>>inability to name files which is one of the many avenues of creating a funny post on Jow Forums
You're more retarded than I initially believed.

Attached: tstpnuq741t01.jpg (750x848, 94K)

>They are. Just a single short sentence. Don't delude yourself into thinking otherwise.
Okay, even if you're correct, where do you think the 1% of longer posts are more likely to come from? I have no doubt that someone with a physical keyboard is more likely to write out a longer post.
>And how the fuck you know that desktop users are even remotely interested in your webms?
People in webm threads are usually interested in webms. Maybe leave Jow Forums every once in a while. Now you're getting into semantics about what's important and what isn't important. I don't think anything on Jow Forums is "important" but I guarantee you that there are people who like watching webms on Jow Forums.
>It still doesn't change the fact majority of desktop users aren't renaming.
Yes it does. As long as a larger percentage of desktop users are renaming compared to phoneposters, desktop users are superior contributors in this context.
>But it's not?
It undeniably is. Removing a letter from a url is more annoying than simply just clicking on it and letting it load. How could you possibly argue otherwise? Not all websites redirect to the desktop site.
> it's harder
Thanks. I bet I could drink the 0.33L bottle quicker and with less trouble than the 0.50L.
>But it still doesn't matter. It such a overwhelming minority that it simply stupid to use it as an argument.
It does matter and it's not stupid. Think back at all the times you've laughed at OC or saved someone's OC because you liked it so much. None of that would have ever happened without desktop users.

Look at all this fucked up greentext.

>On desktop you have to keep all the threads open in tabs to see if there are any answers
what is this 2006

>Let's see how this applies to me
>i am the 1% so it's not true xD

Why stop at just Jow Forums? Why not get rid of all boards that aren't hobbyist in nature? If you're going to get rid of one normalfag board might as well get rid of all of them.

All of these are good things

Rangeban phoneshitters and it would fix pretty much any board.

>AIDS are a good thing

So images uploaded from iphones usually have file names like D83F8D16-939D-43E2-9A0E-0C8EA14EC102.jpg, right? Is there any typical filename for uploads from android devices?

>I have no doubt that someone with a physical keyboard is more likely to write out a longer post.
I have no doubt that if someone have something useful to say he will say it with what he has. The keyboard only makes easier to constantly shitpost.
>People in webm threads are usually interested in webms. Maybe leave Jow Forums every once in a while. Now you're getting into semantics about what's important and what isn't important. I don't think anything on Jow Forums is "important" but I guarantee you that there are people who like watching webms on Jow Forums.
People in webm threads are people in webm threads. You literally cannot stat them. My shitty $120 android tablet from 2013 plays webms just fine. Even with sound. You more likely to find someone with retarded >muh freedom linux distro that can't watch webms due to codecs than someone who is interested in webm, but only has iphone with safari without vlc.
>Yes it does. As long as a larger percentage of desktop users are renaming compared to phoneposters, desktop users are superior contributors in this context.
Percentage difference doesn't matter as long as said percentage is negligible.
>It undeniably is. Removing a letter from a url is more annoying than simply just clicking on it and letting it load. How could you possibly argue otherwise? Not all websites redirect to the desktop site.
And what are websites that are often posted by mobile users that you have to click and it doesn't redirect you on desktop version?
>It does matter and it's not stupid. Think back at all the times you've laughed at OC or saved someone's OC because you liked it so much. None of that would have ever happened without desktop users.
I have literally one image saved from Jow Forums and it was stolen from 2chan(or some other japanese board) anyway. That and also 2 MOBILE wallpapers made by some user for PHONES from Girl's Last Tour's screenshots that i used on my phone until it broke.

>Is there any typical filename for uploads from android devices?
They're saved with same name as it would be save by desktop browser. Android phones have real generic filesystem.

uhhhh
IMG_XXXX?

If it has that name on the server, it'll be saved with that name. You literally cannot distinguish android devices from desktops by imagenames except for rare cases when for some retarded reason server are offering different images for desktop and mobile clients.

OP is faggot.
There you have quality phone poster content.

I think image.jpg is typical of iphones.

>I have no doubt that if someone have something useful to say he will say it with what he has. The keyboard only makes easier to constantly shitpost.
It's easier and faster to type with a physical keyboard. I think people would be more inclined to type longer posts with a physical keyboard. I bet more people think twice about posting a long post on their phone before deciding against it when compared to dekstop users.
>You literally cannot stat them.
Not a bad point even though you've completely moved the goalposts from your original argument about webm.
>And what are websites that are often posted by mobile users that you have to click and it doesn't redirect you on desktop version?
Plenty. Wikipedia is the main one that annoys me and you mentioned YouTube already which is massive.
>Percentage difference doesn't matter as long as said percentage is negligible.
Yes it does. What percentage does it start mattering then? Why are you the selected one in the whole universe that gets to pick the percentage?
>I have literally one image saved from Jow Forums
Cool. I, and many others, have hundreds of images saved. Probably none that were created on a phone.

Attached: phoneposters.jpg (812x166, 39K)

>people defending phoneposters IN THIS THREAD IN THIS BOARD IN THIS WEBSITE
There is no redemption. You will all be put down on a guillotine.

Attached: 1530458857716.jpg (1200x1286, 351K)

You have stats to prove your words?

This ain't your website anymore, desktop faggot you better GO BACK if phone posters make you so assblasted. Also not technology

>It's easier and faster to type with a physical keyboard. I think people would be more inclined to type longer posts with a physical keyboard. I bet more people think twice about posting a long post on their phone before deciding against it when compared to dekstop user
It also makes easier to shitpost. You literally cannot refute that. Saging threads with copypastas/quoting everyone is possible only on keyboard. Is that quality content you talking about?
>Not a bad point even though you've completely moved the goalposts from your original argument about webm.
But i'm not? ALso, you literally can convert video to webm on android devices.
>Plenty. Wikipedia is the main one that annoys me and you mentioned YouTube already which is massive.
You can install userscript for redirecting from mobile wikipedia to desktop. What the point of going to youtube anyway if you can watch it right here?
>Yes it does. What percentage does it start mattering then? Why are you the selected one in the whole universe that gets to pick the percentage?
Why are you the selected one in the whole universe that gets to pick the percentage?
>Cool. I, and many others, have hundreds of images saved. Probably none that were created on a phone.
Good for you. But you haven't created them. You consumed that content which can also be done with a phone. Are those people who creating content creating it specifically for desktop users?

You can rename files on Clover sweetie and if you unironically belive that people cant multiquote you might consider to apply for retardbux

Burn their families alive as well for raising such retarded pieces of shit.

No, android is a desktop-like OS, not a toy OS. It won't automatically rename anything. The ONLY indication you'd get is if anyone was posting screenshots/videos/photos taken by the device.
Screenshot_Date and just IMG_CurrentDate for a photo.

But if you rename an image it will stay renamed. And this ONLY means that the image is taken by a phone camera, it doesn't mean that it's being posted from a phone. Plus, if you remove identifying info from the image such as device the image is taken from, it won't even be easy to prove it's shot by a phone because anyone can just name an image IMG_xxx_xxx.

>IMG_CurrentDate
My android tablet photos are saved as date without IMG_. And it was that by default. By coincidence, my desktop screenshot tool saves images with basically same name format except for a one space instead of an underscore.

>Screenshot_Date and just IMG_CurrentDate for a photo.
This reminds me.
You can search for videos using Android timestamp format on youtube to find phone recorded video, most with zero views. Since youtube gets more uploaded video than is practical for anyone to monitor, who knows what's there under titles you wouldn't typically look for.

And just looking for dates works well because the format is IMG_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS or something and youtube changes the underscores to spaces

>It also makes easier to shitpost.
You're moving the goalposts again. Shitposts don't have to be long. see >But i'm not?
You're initial argument was that webm's aren't important so who cares.
>What the point of going to youtube anyway if you can watch it right here?
check out the comments, related videos or the channel it came from
>Why are you the selected one in the whole universe that gets to pick the percentage?
I'm not. I'm merely recognising that differences in percentages represent a difference, full stop.
>But you haven't created them.
But I have created some. Some that could not and were not created on a phone.

>image.jpg
>IMG_XXXX.jpg
>DBC5-98EJ-UYU9-5G6N.jpg
>maxresdefault.jpg

Attached: disgust.jpg (200x192, 7K)

This post is the reason we need a mobile client ban and a non-GNU/Linux ban.

yet you face book frog post

Attached: snapshot_18.42_[2016.12.23_03.26.33].png (1920x1080, 1.17M)

>post phoneposting image names
>"yet you posted from your PC!"
wow, thanks

>2017-05-16_16-39-12
>2018-01-23 21-53-19
One is a photo, another is a screenshot from the desktop. Which one is which?
>You're moving the goalposts again. Shitposts don't have to be long
It's you who are moving goalposts. It's easier to write shitposts on keyboard the same way as it easier to write long posts.
>You're initial argument was that webm's aren't important so who cares.
Because they aren't? Even if they are important for you, you just cannot use them as an argument because only small percentage of users of small percentage of users cannot watch them.
>check out the comments, related videos or the channel it came from
fuck off, normie
> I'm merely recognising that differences in percentages represent a difference
It's not.
>But I have created some. Some that could not and were not created on a phone.
Is that so important for you that your OC was watched by 100 desktop user who haven't created any oc or it was watched by 100 desktop user who haven't created any OC and 100 mobile users who haven't created any OC?

>posts a jpeg artifact encrusted thumbnail of pepe
the irony

>probably skip over long posts too due to smaller attention span
FTFY

>People in webm threads are usually interested in webms. Maybe leave Jow Forums every once in a while.
Fuck off /gif/, no one cares about your BBC cuckposting

>It's you who are moving goalposts.
No. I wrote initially about people being less likely to write long posts on their phone due to it taking more time and effort. You then changed it to something about shitposting. That's moving the goalposts.
>only small percentage
You're doing it again. Give me a percentage where things start to matter and tell me why that specific percentage matters or stop doing it.
>fuck off, normie
looking at youtube videos isn't inherently normie behaviour, you buzzword-spewing spastic
>It's not.
differences in percentages aren't differences? you're a fucking moron
>Is that so important for you that your OC was watched
It's not about who has watched it. You're moving the goalposts again. It was about who has created it. Fuck me.

sent from my iPhone

Attached: IMG_1528.jpg (3264x2448, 1.19M)

This post is the reason why we need to stone to death all the GNU/Linux retards

That is not ironic in the slightest.

>complains about people posting shit images
>attaches a shit image to their post
retard

>complains about people phoneposting
>doesn't phonepost
retard

amazing retort desu

Attached: 1396956385592.jpg (1024x768, 81K)

>image isn't renamed for le comic value
YOU ARE EVERYTHING WRONG WITH Jow Forums

Vivian James is my wife

It's true though.

It would be ironic if I complained about phoneposting from my phone - but I didn't.

Nice try though, brainlet.

the absolute state of frogposters

the absolute state of not knowing what irony is

>It was about who has created it
You still haven't said anything useful about how amount of consumers are somehow related to the amount of those who producing it. WiIl the amount of oc magically increase if we somehow ban everyone who only posts from phone?

Been saying for a long time that phoneposting and even browsing should be blocked, but obviously it never will because muh shekels. In long threads on Jow Forums it's obvious that phoneshitters frequently only read the first 30 and the last 30 posts, so you see the same epic meme-laden oneliner posted several times

Oh come on. The point was fucking simple. More OC is created on PCs. If everyone was a phoneposter, there'd be next to no OC. Understand?

>PC posting will prevent me from shitposting
I leave my shit wherever I want, whenever I want, how I want. :^)

Attached: 1523872808074.gif (164x300, 2.14M)