>Paying more than $50 for a phone
Paying more than $50 for a phone
Angel Lewis
Other urls found in this thread:
Jordan Davis
Enjoy you're nokia 3310
William Smith
>being such a poorfag that someone needs to post on Jow Forums seeking recognition for being a poor bastard
Kys faggot
Caleb Davis
>being that far into poverty
Luis Campbell
(You)
Hudson Richardson
You're telling me I can get slightly used Samsung smartphone for how much? At Ross!?
Angel White
If you're not a smartphone zombie whose neck is permanently damaged from his head hanging down over his phone, and if you just need a phone to, you know, make and take calls, that's exactly what you get. A $25 mobile phone with a week of battery time. I did and I'm happy with it.
Adrian Walker
What phone do you have?
Evan Moore
what?!
Connor Bennett
Phones are little mini computers. Stop not wanting to use a smartphone you rape digulent cybernetical mumbo unit Zesty cheese cyborg ZESTY CHEEEEEEEESE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Trianglulated cyber breakfasts raping the youth of America with cheese Cybernetical jumbo youngster trampoline cyber belly I lov
Robert Phillips
There's no phone for less than or equal to $50 that isn't a price of shit.
Daniel Gomez
I bought an Essential Phone on the amazon prime sale for over half off. AMA you jealous fucks (no i wont let you try it)
Wyatt Brown
>paying for a phone
Charles Hill
I literally got my phone for 67 USD and I regret it.
Aaron Hughes
Are you telling me that there is more bang for my buck phones at ROSS!???
Jack Flores
Nokia 107 2017 is 35€ and genuinely the best dumbphone out there.
Jackson Cook
> no whatsapp
> no telegram
> no messenger
no wonder you need a dumbphone, so your mommy can call you, right?
Daniel Barnes
Stop using a portable surveillance machine all together, I say.
Daniel Collins
tyrone take that back please
Xavier Campbell
Noah Nguyen
>no literal malware
Ok, I'm fine with that. You could've made better arguments.
Nicholas Allen
Telegram is free software, it isn't malware.
Noah Kelly
>paying for phones
>paying for anything
You are a walking asshole if you do that.
Gavin Hall
It's trash.
Jose Reyes
Your problem is with their servers and encryption, not the messaging software.
Charles Stewart
>Does the app secure messages and attachments?
>Riot.im
>No
Should clearly be in yellow as that fundtionality can be switched on. It may not do so out of the box but the feature is uincluded and the app can do it without modding.
Anthony Brooks
>2018
>not using snapchat
Logan Sanders
I don't use trash
True, but I didn't make the list.
Ayden Watson
so, i'm supposed to trust some completely unsourced list some random user on Jow Forums posted?
Austin Edwards
>not getting a flagship phone for free
Oliver Bell
It think it's a screenshot from a website that does that stuff
Surely someone can post it
Andrew Howard
Why the fuck would you care about sources for something like this? No source will ever tell you anything different, why do you consider certain sites more credible? This is all something you can find out yourself.
But here's the source faggot securemessagingapps.com
Matthew Morgan
>secure messaging
>smart phones
that's a joke, right?
Connor Sullivan
>Why the fuck would you care about sources for something like this?
I'm supposed to trust some table with green good red bad and no evidence backing it up?
Eli Powell
this table says telegram collects user data and reads your messages but gives no source
search engines come up with nothing for that either, this site is bullshit if it isn't going to source its claims
Nathaniel Kelly
In the case of hosting your own matrix server, Riot is one of the least shitty alternatives to Discord on something like Windows
Liam Lewis
Yeah it seems like the site assumes the worst unless the developers of the individual apps have proven or firmly stated otherwise.
But then Again... So do it
Ryan Morales
I
Brayden Scott
I trust it enough when Iran and Russia ban it because they can't read the messages.
You'd have to be worse than Stallman paranoid to think that's orchestrated.
Ethan Evans
I can see securemessagingapps.com
Lucas Jenkins
You're supposed to trust a random site anyways without evidence to back it up? A lot of sites don't give sources for claims, but are still correct.
Because when it comes to security you're guilty until proven innocent, just in case.
That's what they want you to think. Also if it were true that the only reason they banned telegram is because they can't read messages they'd also ban Signal and Wire.
Jeremiah Russell
>Because when it comes to security you're guilty until proven innocent, just in case.
The burden of proof is on the person making a claim.
Isaiah Howard
That's not how it works in software, unless you don't care about privacy and security.
But, since the app is open source I guess burden of proof does apply.
Robert Lewis
how many people use signal and wire compared to telegram?
They target what's big with opposition in their country and not some shit a couple of autists from Jow Forums use
Mason Jenkins
Singal is widely used, Wire is kinda popular.
Until I checked I actually didn't know telegram was so popular. I personally don't know of anyone who uses it, but a lot of people use Signal here.
Robert Carter
Agreed
Stallman paranoid would tell us that NSA can listen in and that's why other countries banned it
Cameron Collins
kek, I'm in there, I posted the george.jpg ones as a copycat