Performs almost 30% better than before patch

youtu.be/UTguywiC9aw

>Performs almost 30% better than before patch
>On par with it being an i9

>NAYSAYERS BTFO
>SOFTWARE CANT FIX HARDWARE ISSUE NAYSAYERS BTFO
>APPLE HATERS BTFO

SUCK IT

Attached: maxresdefault (2).jpg (1280x720, 128K)

Other urls found in this thread:

dell.com/community/XPS/Dell-XPS-15-9570-i9-thermals-throttling-and-solutions/m-p/6116619
youtube.com/watch?v=18PA3WFFuAo&feature=youtu.be
youtube.com/watch?v=_hYHwkIuEMo
youtube.com/watch?v=aKm6opbKgB8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What did Apple do to fix the VRM with a patch?

Will it blow after 1 year?

Since its not open source, you'll never know.

If you run actual demanding work on an apple machine you are doing it wrong. Its more of a fashion statement that you are a cool nerdy guy that knows tech. Hence the low priority on engineering decision relating to thermal issues. Its more important to make it look good and slim.

100 C as average in heavy loads.

Parch just fix for short workloads.

>no other laptop has these issues!

o-oh... dell.com/community/XPS/Dell-XPS-15-9570-i9-thermals-throttling-and-solutions/m-p/6116619

The fans are spinning at full speed at 98C

Attached: macsVsPC2.jpg (620x3095, 1.13M)

same guy that reported the throttling in the first place

youtube.com/watch?v=18PA3WFFuAo&feature=youtu.be

Apple must had pay him at least 50k

DELID

Deep mind team and google programmers works in Linux workstations, using MacBooks for presentations,emails or reports.

Attached: 1509906538367.jpg (774x800, 106K)

ITT: Poojeet Apple Defense Force

Daily reminder:
Apple thermal solution has its weak spot not in the size of its heasink or fan blowing speed, but in the chink thermal paste foxconn applies.
Apple will start soldering their heatsinks to the CPU soon. And it will be a sensible decision.

[citation required]

>Apple will start soldering their heatsinks to the CPU soon
Why do you think this has never been done before?

I dare you to go to any software company and tell me what their teams are using.

>Uses SW to limit and use cpu inefficiently
>Releases 'patch' to fix it.
Classic appel

Fuck yeah, just in time. My new machine gets here on friday.

Congrats user, mine gets here in a few days too. How do you feel about being hated by the rest of Jow Forums for using an expensive product?

Yeah but do those people writing software know how to rice out a desktop and hoard hundreds of terabytes of anime and porn??

Fucked if I care, Im excited to move up from my 2013 MBA. It's been a warrior (and is still actually working fine and in near perfect shape) but I could do with some more power.

I'm also ready for the USB C life, I got a Lenovo p27h last month so I can use it as a drive hub & my desk charger.

Dunno what im gonna do with my MBA yet, media server maybe?

He's obviously correct about the first half. You can't even compile the latest tensorflow correctly on OSX without a lot of hacky shit

>bashing muh meggerhurtz instead of bashing gaping security flaws like spectre, spectre-ng, meltdown etc. in the cpus of multithousand dollar computers
Top notch pr department.

Humanity will go extinct. This civilization cannot be saved anymore.

I'd explain it to you but I don't think you'd understand

Nice

So you don't know either...

>conference room
>conference room
>conference room
>conference room
>control room
We see one Macbook where it isn't in the context of reading or taking notes.
On the other hand, in the New Horizons Mission Operations.

Attached: hooray.jpg (900x600, 217K)

New horizons you say?

Attached: pluto_cheer.jpg (780x520, 180K)

If I explained it to you I'm sure you'd loose your train of thought halfway through my intellectal post

>conference room

> What did Apple do to fix the VRM with a patch?
They explicitly said that it had nothing to do with the VRMs, even though there are people who have taken the thing apart and used a bunch of tools I don't even know the name of to confirm that yes, a major part of the issue is the VRM.

100% would not surprise me if that's what they did.
> the '''''patch''''' simply modifies the fan curve
> apple fans lose their shit over how good the customer support is for Apple

It's an apple product, they designed it to break in 1 year regardless of any other issues.

>Why do you think this has never been done before?
not him but have they ever deployed such a high tdp chip in a laptop this fucking thin before?

45W TDP isn't that unusual.

>not him but have they ever deployed such a high tdp chip in a laptop this fucking thin before?
The i9 is 45W TDP.

I'm posting this from a 47W i7 2014 Retina MacBook.

Just say you don't understand either :) there's nothing to lose. ))))))

What do you think they should do, scrap the product because a horde of armchair thermal cooling experts who will never buy a mac don't like it?

Doesn't make much business sense.

>100 Celsius
Can you even call it a laptop at this point? 100C in your lap?

They're all press and or management. Engineering would be done on linux and windows machines.

It's a notebook not a laptop.

Attached: notebook.png (342x28, 8K)

Haters can now pack their bags hahahahaha
and no they did not simply adjust the fan curve

Attached: winning.jpg (1920x1080, 219K)

>YOU'RE USING IT WRONG!!!!
Classic.
youtube.com/watch?v=_hYHwkIuEMo

There was literally a team of macfags in my company who didn't accept anyone who didn't have a mac. I'm so glad they are fucking fired.

Go fix a laptop louis.

Looks to me like they adjusted the fan curves.
See how there's hardly any gain from setting max fan speed now? That's because it's already running near max.

Try me

>desktop - 0:09

If anything this just shows how fucking brainwashed the Apple cult is, people were still defending the new MacBook Pros even though they actually genuinely had something wrong with them.

or... you know... they might compile their shit on a CI like any decent developer? god it's so rampant 99.9% of Jow Forums are unemployed uni rejects

Go fix a laptop Tareque

>What did Apple do to fix the VRM with a patch?
Raised the max VRM temperature above which the CPU throttles probably.

>Will it blow after 1 year?
If it outlasts the warranty it's a success.

Very good. Two questions remain though:
How does it perform at exporting video longer than 5 minutes? If they raised the short-term temperature tolerance it would improve this but still suck ass at longer jobs.
How does it compare to similarly specced non Apple computers?

?
that doesn't even make sense

They blamed Intel, for lying about the TDP, they blamed the user, for running these types of loads, then they praised Apple for patching it.

>god it's so rampant 99.9% of Jow Forums are unemployed uni rejects
and you must be a humanities reject seeing as you have troubles compiling a single sentence

>45W
>high tdp chip
shills and fanbois scraping the bottom of the barrel

for a laptop, yes, kind of

Windows + Visual Studio
most software companies are dinosaurs

Poor guys, being amazed and astounded by Apple fixing something that they shouldn't need to fix if they did their job right.

Also blaming Intel. Yeah yeah, these kikes are always responsible for some shit. If Intel is so shit, why don't they let their users switch to AMD? What's the problem? Can't do it? Oops. maybe Apple should take the full blame.

it really isn't, but competent vendors usually install a cooling solution that can handle it, unlike Apple who had problems cooling 15W chips but somehow feel the need to go above that
for reference, high TDP chips would be actual desktop CPUs which get put into high-end gaming laptops along with two desktop GPUs in SLI

>nuh-uh
k

Those laptops are thicc enough to handle the heat generated by those chips.

nice argument friendo

yeah, but why would you put a 45W chip in a thin fashion accessory?
conversely, why would you make your professional product line into thin fashion accessories?
I GUESS WE'LL NEVER KNOW...

Nothing mission critical runs on a Mac, it is just for gathering data on if curiosity or new horizons is dead or not. New horizons was passing through unexplored space that was potentially full of debris with no chance to maneuver. And even if we had real time communication with it, it was oriented the wrong way to talk or listen to Earth while taking photos of the flyby. The same with curiosity. By the time we noticed bad telemetry on entry/landing, the rover would already be dead before we could send a response. The computers in the conference, and even in the control rooms, have zero impact on the outcome of the mission. The computers are selected by user preference, not mission criticalness. And hell, they are probably picked just because they are the most expensive computer available and NASA covers it as a business expense.

youtube.com/watch?v=aKm6opbKgB8

I don’t get it, if you want a i9 at its peak performance, you buy a desktop pc.

If you want it on a laptop, you have two options :
-gaming laptop, that is hardly portable
-thin laptop, which will have cooling issues because of physics

Every thin laptop sporting an i9 has cooling issues.

If you want to have a good transportable and powerfull laptop, you don’t need anyhing over an i7 anyway.

If you buy a laptop with an i9, either you have very niche requirements and are willing to put up with the cooling issues OR you just make a wealth statement, in which case you will never need you full CPU’s power.

In either case i don’t see why you are all blaming apple for having cooling issues with a fucking i9 on a thin laptop, because physics tells us it can’t hardly happen otherwise.
99.99% of you don’t need a thin laptop with an i9 for work nor are whealthy enough to afford one.

But you LOVE bashing Apple because your thinkpad feel subjectively less crappy in comparison

right back atcha, retard

The people find a problem. The people are not happy. Apple sees it. Apple fixes it. The people are happy. Tim Cook Wins again.

It quite simple really. i7 fast, i9 faster.

hahah holy shit Jow Forums btfo

Attached: btfo.jpg (740x650, 60K)

Yeah, and spending a thousand dollar more for a small increase in performance isn’t worth it

You don’t need the absolute best if you have a normal workflow

Most people work with hardware that is at least 2-3 years old. You won’t tell me that having faster processors is vital unless you are in a niche market.

>implying it's $1000
>implying it's a small increase

DAB on them MacBrosPro

Attached: 59A8C21C-63A3-4FFF-ACA8-02EE2DE4A740.gif (524x399, 53K)

>thousand dollar
It's 400 bucks. Chump change if you use the machine to make money. Every time saved is money.

>Jow Forums now saying i9s not ever worth it

top fucking kek, trying to shit on apple all fucking week and in 1 tiny patch apple made you all stfu

see
that's the guy that brought this all to light, even beats freezer times

>not worth it
>34% faster

And every money saved is money

?

but user
these pictures looks more like conferences
so you're saying that journalists use macs exclusively?

>hey user why don't you spend $400 to increase productivity
>na rather save it

Louis on suicide watch

You just proved him right. Fashion statements for press shots.

>If you run actual demanding work on an apple machine you are doing it wrong.
Huh. So why do they market these machines towards professional heavy workloads?

Attached: be553a6d-831d-4cef-bfec-7a404f7d3750.png (1015x633, 67K)

sorry, sometimes I get confused knowing 3 languages, how are burgers this time if the year?

b-b-but user earns $200/month

m-macs are bad guys they are overpriced shit *sobbing on

d-delete this!

Why is it acceptable for laptops to run at 80C while my desktop can't even reach 70C?

and with the flick of a switch apple shows everyone they do it best

i really don't know.
its not like the tech doesn't exist to cool the cpu inside a laptop. it will make it bit heavier / bulkier

because they're portable machines

Weight is a factor so is thickness. The only way for better cooling is much thicker and not like 2mm we're talking gaming laptop thick or you make the battery smaller and move the board down and bigger fans or thicker heat pipes

I don't think you understand why this was so funny.
Old macbook performed better than new one

and now it's fixed and is 35% faster, wasn't even a week

This is a "fix" not a fix. But yes, now this problem is no longer a prevalent one but damage was already done and jokes are not going to stop.

lol what jokes, look how little shit talking there is now

not ever 1 mac toddler in the thread. they fixed it fast and it performs better than it did in the freezer test

You are mac toddler, in this thread.

>still can't break 3GHz
>fixed

Attached: 2018-07-25-120030_683x393_scrot.png (683x393, 145K)

What the fuck is the point of putting an "i9" in a slim laptop and keeping the fans low?
Its still going to fuck the VRMs and mobo with high temperatures.
Also what the fuck is the point of advertising 4.9GHz when thermal throttling means that it will never reach that speed because of thermals. Its like putting a Ferrarri engine in a civic and advertising speeds that it will never reach.

Attached: explain-this-bullshit.jpg (533x800, 64K)