Nano is barely a step above using notepad. Use ed because it's the standard editor.
Gabriel Cruz
It's not vim or emacs, ie. it wasn't implemented retarded or by people that can't into reasonable defaults. Well done, appreciated.
Asher Jackson
I assume you haven't watched the asciicasts.
Easton Wilson
>Nano is barely a step above using notepad No shit. Luckily that's really all you need to fiddle with config files.I don't think it was ever really intended to be used for anything else.
Anthony Brooks
This. Nano is godsend.
Wyatt Thompson
>>Nano is barely a step above using notepad >No shit. It's not. Can you browse internet with a notepad? asciinema.org/a/193585
Ryan Hughes
No but for that I use curl or wget if I'm feeling adventurous.
Noah Carter
What makes this any better than the other terminal web browers like lynx or elinks?
Colton Cooper
It doesn't. But it shows that using nano isn't "just barely a step above using notepad".
Zachary Foster
bloat
Daniel Anderson
It's lighter than both Vim and Emacs.
Nicholas Thompson
Alright so it's capable of doing more than notepad. It still pales in comparison what vi and ed are capable of. That's why it still feels like you're on notepad even if it technically can do more than notepad.
Lincoln Jones
OK,you win, Nano can do a handful of impractical crap nobody would ever bother to use a text editor for.
Why isn't this feature more documented? This is a really useful capability.
Joseph Gray
What can ed do that nano can't?
Lincoln Morgan
Can nano be used from a shell script?
Angel Price
Good thread.
>Real work Use an IDE. Nobody but autistic jobless neckbeard boomers use Vim. >Config file editing Use nano. It's nearly everywhere and it just werks.
Robert Parker
wait can you use ed like sed? I wish you could, because sed sucks $ ed file 2480 $-10,$d *deletes the last 10 lines* q $ sed -n '$-10,$d' file sed: 1: "$-10,$d": invalid command code -