The only alternative to Windows/Apple
The only alternative to Windows/Apple
Jeremiah Murphy
Ian Brooks
OpenBSD is a meme
>Filesystem
default FS doesn't even support SSD TRIM, and I don't think OpenBSD supports anything modern like ZFS or BTRFS.
>Security
"Only two remote holes in the default install!!!!!!!"
Yay!
I hope you realize that this literally only applies to a base system install with absolutely no packages added. In other words, not exactly representative or meaningful towards... anything really
>Sustainability
A few years ago, OpenBSD was actually in danger of shutting down because they couldn't keep the fucking lights on. How could anyone see this as a system they could rely on, when it could be in danger of ending at any time?
>Standards-compliance
"B-But OpenBSD is written in strictly standards-compliant C! Clearly that's better than muh GNU virus!"
So you're not allowed to create extensions to the standard? You should only implement the standard and nothing more? Keep in mind that this is nothing like EEE, as the GNU extensions are Free Software, with freely available source code, as opposed to proprietary shite. People should be allowed to innovate and improve things.
If you're gonna be anal about standards-compliance, then why let people make their own implementations anyway? Why not have the standards organizations make one C implementation and force everyone to use it?
Ayden Butler
The worst pajeet pasta
Jackson Roberts
Innaccurate garbage.
Brayden Lee
This pasta was posted 69+ times in April and May
Joshua Allen
Yeah, I'm well aware. Any thread about anything BSD pretty much.
And it's clear they've never used OpenBSD, no idea why the vendetta.
Isaiah Hernandez
It's not even funny posting this at this point.
Jaxson James
Yeah, it's great if you want to listen to music, browse the internet, edit text documents and run a html web server on a early 2010s desktop computer.
John Edwards
>no idea why the vendetta.
Linux Foundation must keep paying big salaries to their CEOs and fellow researchers
Ian Cox
what about Linux, Android (soon with Fuchsia hopefully), Solaris, OpenIndiana, FreeBSD or NetBSD?
Camden Smith
Apr 14, 2001
William Scott
the claims of auditing and security are still utter joke, any time some external researcher digs into it there are dozens of security flags
Luis Gray
best bet is TrueOS, NetBSD or Alpine
Justin Hernandez
Fucking based
Sebastian James
>Alpine
sadly, for how much it's used in docker they lack enough developers
Christopher Lee
FreeBSD works a lot better for a desktop system. Proprietary nVidia drivers, linux compatability layer, proper SMP support, easier to understand documentation
Julian Hughes
>botnet compatibility twice
>better
Carter Martinez
Yeah if you just want a terminal then you're fine sticking with OpenBSD.
Isaiah Garcia
what about TrueOS or Alpine? it has botnet without feminism
Juan Johnson
TrueOS has terrible performance for whatever reason. I've never used Alpine. Some retarded code of conduct doesn't affect you, they're all retarded when it comes down to it, and 99% of people you have to deal with are retarded anyways, code or conduct or not.
Justin Martinez
>linux
Tyler Sullivan
Alpine is a linux distribution? Yeah no no thank you
Gabriel Jackson
Nice shitpost. You showed me wrong.
Nathan Hill
I appreciate your honesty
Oliver Young
>You showed me wrong
>wasn't even (You)ing you
Lucas Reyes
It sucks compared to gnu linux.
Mason Cook
>gnoo
Go away, moron.
Mason Clark
samefag && copypasta
Benjamin Hill
*BSD for me is like Windows Phone, great OS but without software without software what i need, there is no reason to use this.
Parker Nelson
Developers, developers, developers, developers?
Jose Cooper
>TrueOS
>NetBSD
Both of those consistently have more bugs than OpenBSD, and NetBSD doesn't even boot on some machines anymore.