>Competitive salary and benefits.
Competitive salary and benefits
x = y * x
y = 1 or x = 0
2 = 1 * 2
x cannot be zero or it is not longer a well-defined function
y = 1 on domain [-inf, 0),(0, +inf] (i forget if I've used brackets around inf)
More from this set, OP?
>x cannot be zero or it is not longer a well-defined function
Who said it's a function? It's just an equation.
>y has to be a function of x
>fags
Neck yourselves
Go read a book on algebra, you stupid Gen Zer.
>Comp-sci students
Why are zoomers so quick to anger?
t. Afro-American gender studies student
WRONG
How retarded do you need to be to try to find an answer to a meaningless identity.
>he cant find the answer
umad?
Answer to what nigger?
You just posted a statement.
>can't into mathematical bants
It must be sad being this stupid
your and idiot
how about x and y are both
[1 0]
[0 0]
then x=y*x=x^2
the equation also works with x being
[0 0]
[1 0]
and y being
[0 0]
[0 1]
This is the stupidest thing I've read all morning. Stick to JavaScriptâ„¢
Boolean 'or' (inclusive or) is not exclusive 'or' (either-or).
>Boolean 'or' (inclusive or) is not exclusive 'or' (either-or).
it's neither, it's exponentiation notation, commonly used to typeset mathematical equations.
x = y * x holds true for y = 1 or y = 0, and x is a member of the set of all real numbers.
>it's neither, it's exponentiation notation
I was referring to you stupid shit.
>I was referring to you stupid shit.
I see, and how did I treat the "or" in that post as "exclusive or" ? (protip: I didnt)
retarded idiot.
You autists are really arguing over a stupid post I made, Christ almighty.
>how did I treat the "or" in that post as "exclusive or" ?
When you started rambling on about how when both are equal to zero. Kys.
Competing in the race to the bottom.
But and are right, you pathetic memer.
It's rare to see people saying something pondered like this.
Why are you pretending to be me, zoomer?