/talosii/

The mainboard we need, but not the one we deserve

Attached: Talos II.jpg (749x374, 68K)

Other urls found in this thread:

git.raptorcs.com/git/
tenfourfox.blogspot.com/2018/06/another-weekend-on-new-computer-or.html
wiki.raptorcs.com/wiki/Troubleshooting/GPU
alt.fedoraproject.org/alt/
ubuntu.com/download/server/power
packages.debian.org/unstable/games/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: image.php.jpg (978x627, 117K)

PCIe 4.0
CAPI 2.0
up to 1 TiB RAM per socket
POWER9 Sforza scale-out CPU

fully open source firmware:
git.raptorcs.com/git/

Attached: awaiting heatsinks.jpg (1920x1280, 366K)

CPUs go up to 22 cores, with SMT4 (four threads per core) for a max total of 176 threads.

Attached: benchmark can't saturate 160 threads.png (1920x1080, 462K)

Low core count chips (4 and 8 core) get double the usual 5 MiB of L3 cache per core.

Attached: lowend config.jpg (831x570, 50K)

Attached: Everything is opensource.png (522x310, 37K)

No silly RGB, just pure POWER

Attached: logos are for lusers.jpg (1920x1280, 561K)

You can get it without the proprietary SAS controller if you so desire

Attached: T2P9D01-no-SAS.png (1182x862, 1017K)

Or with it, since it's isolated with IOMMU groups, there isn't a big risk.
Besides, you are encrypting your hard drives anyway, right?

Attached: T2P9D01.png (1500x1000, 1.31M)

So is Power9 backwards compatible with most or all instructions of the G4/G5 chips that Apple used to use before 2006? I'm interested in MacOS 9 and OS X Tiger emulation through QEMU. If the hardware is compatible I would be able to just use kernel VM and get insane performance, right? This really arouses my almonds.

Attached: 97dbdec11405f205ac267c5045964072653307cf1d94ae03737f3cd768fa87fb.jpg (242x247, 11K)