>2018
>he isn't using qutebrowser.
What the fuck is wrong with you? Why aren't you using the superior qutebrowser? A-a-are you still using F-f-firefox or C-c-c-chromium?
STOP USING FIREFOX/CHROMIUM, USE QUTEBROWSER!
Julian Carter
Other urls found in this thread:
github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
raw.githubusercontent.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
twitter.com
Bentley Powell
stop forcing your shit on other people.
you make me fucking sick cunt kys
Ayden Morgan
Won't even consider before they have fully working uMatrix analog
Thomas Gutierrez
Does it
>have functionality to block js, images, css and scripts persite wise
>block ads
>force https
>block trackers
>edit css for sites
>use our own js scripts on sites
If your answer to any of them is no, then no thanks.
Camden Rivera
Yes to all of them.
Oliver Baker
Thanks, I might give it a try
Hudson Roberts
>>have functionality to block js, images, css and scripts persite wise
How can I do this without editing my config every time?
Samuel Edwards
>have functionality to block js, images, css and scripts persite wise
JS: yes
images: yes
CSS: not yet, github.com
scripts: What scripts if not JS?
>block ads
yes, but only based on a host blacklist, see github.com
>force https
There's HSTS support, and ":open -s" which opens a URL but forces HTTPS (but not for any links on that page). See github.com
>block trackers
Yes, using the host blocker
>edit css for sites
Yes, via the content.user_stylesheets setting
>use our own js scripts on sites
Yes (support for most greasemonkey scripts)
Sebastian Bennett
Using :set (which changes autoconfig.yml), for JS there's a "tsh" shortcut (see :bind tsh).
Brody Roberts
hey The-Compiler. if you read this please add support for mouse bindings, scrolling feels like a drag on Linux and it would be nice to be able to change how many pixels it scrolls, also it would be nice to be able to add aliases to the right click context menu.
Nathaniel Martinez
If you mention qutebrowser somewhere on Jow Forums, chances are high that I do read it.
See github.com
Nicholas Morris
How do I clear cookies on this?
Brayden Jenkins
Mouse lol
Ayden King
How does the spell check work
Someone hold my hand :c
Ryan Jenkins
Remove ~/.local/share/qutebrowser/webengine/Cookies (but qutebrowser needs to be closed first).
github.com
Dominic Bennett
Yeah I'm still using Firefox
Matthew Miller
Why should I use it instead of vimb?
Julian Ward
I should've been more specific
Where do I get dictcli.py?
Doesn't show in the qutebrowsers scripts
I'm using the one from the debian repo, btw.
Chase Evans
vimb isn't bad. qutebrowser probably has some more features (or is less minimal, depends on your point of view), and uses a better engine (from a security and web features perspective at least), QtWebEngine rather than WebKit.
Ryder Jones
Hmm, might want to open a bug against Debian so they install the scripts somewhere.
You can get it from the repo: raw.githubusercontent.com
Brandon Harris
> Not using surfing keys on vivaldi
Aaron Davis
I want to like it, but unless it gets an easy uMatrix-like interface, it's too much of a hassle.
I want to browse, not update some configuration/text files, damn it.
Also, figuring out how to use stuff like decentraleyes, random user agent, cookie autodelete, resist fingerprinting, blocking the canvas, etc. are already pretty well documented in firefox.
I'm not even sure if all those have (planned?) qutebrowser equivalents.
Lucas Gonzalez
can i watch netflix on it? no? fuck off retard
Jaxon Foster
>easy uMatrix-like interface
github.com
>I want to browse, not update some configuration/text files, damn it.
That's what keybindings are for, like "tsh" to toggle JavaScript for the current page.
>Also, figuring out how to use stuff like decentraleyes, random user agent, cookie autodelete, resist fingerprinting, blocking the canvas, etc. are already pretty well documented in firefox.
Some of those are already possible, some will come once there's a plugin API (see github.com
You can. QtWebEngine supports WideVine.
Ethan White
I'm glad this browser is in development and not a dead project. It's my favourite browser so far even though it lacks some crucial features. Keep up the good work guys.
Asher James
Is there anyway to default open -s?
Brandon Cook
>better engine
I thought webkitgtk2 sorted the security features out.
Ryder Mitchell
Ew, blacklist blocking
Nathaniel Butler
How do I add ot the block list?
Hudson Jones
I tried to install that on my xubuntu 16, but after doing the today shit all I got was pyqt errors
Jose Williams
after doing the tox*
Nathaniel Wood
You can alias it, but then you'll lose :open completion until those get proper completion: github.com
Not really. Still a lot behind Chromium in terms of security (and probably manpower for security) - for example, there's still no process sandboxing (at least there's isolation since WebKit2).
There will be a more sophisticated adblocker at some point, but until then, hostblocking works pretty good (and probably is quite a bit faster).
Either change content.host_blocking.lists, or add hosts to a ~/.config/qutebrowser/blocked-hosts
Did you use "tox -e mkvenv-pypi-old" (see the install docs)? PyQt5 5.11.2 has a bug causing it to break with Python 3.5 (it works with 3.6 and 3.7).
Juan Butler
I would love to switch to qtbrowser, but I am too comfortable with my current Firefox set-up. :-/ Maybe if I found a good guide to get what I want from a browser.
Jonathan Cox
I switch back and forth.
Although qt is great, Firefox is still the best for privacy. And still works the best when dealing with modern websites.
James Harris
I'm u-u-using w-w-w3m
Caleb Thomas
>>easy uMatrix-like interface
>github.com
>4 issue for 4 years
>still not implemented
wow like just wow