Explain this

explain this

Attached: U8UYeyJwPvGEDfJBvmLzEMj77wteBc1TIpgrDZh2qIg.jpg (1024x649, 123K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.ebay.co.uk/itm/AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-1920X-3-5GHz-Twelve-Core-Socket-TR4-Processor/182711606935?ul_ref=http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/710-53481-19255-0/1?ff3=2&toolid=10044&campid=5338034448&customid=&lgeo=1&vectorid=229508&item=182711606935&srcrot=710-53481-19255-0&rvr_id=1623791099923&rvr_ts=14fde5541650ac1e2fd0cff4ffefcf0b&_mwBanner=1&_rdt=1&ul_noapp=true&epid=16012062600
sicomputers.nl/cpu-amd-am4-ryzen-threadripper-1920x.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Delete This Right Now

>paid 500 euros for the 1800x at launch when a 12 core 1st gen TR is now 400
well... i guess that's how they make money.At least i won't feel bad since they invest the profit properly
For your average consumer, and virtually everybody,competition it's good.
Eventually though, people will have to realise that the industry will stagnate since new improvements will be harder and harder to achieve, and even good competition won't make the money necessary for the research needed.

Did the same thing. 1800x, but very happy with it regardless of the quick ramp up for AMD. It's still a great processor for me.

Is that FX-8350 any good? $90 for 8 cores sounds bretty good

That's why you can grab a i5-3570 for value price

deprecated. 2200g is entry level.

BASED AND REDPILLED

Simple, Intel got comfy as the only producer on the market and planned business strategies around overcharging for mediocre upgrades. AMD seized the opportunity to make quality 6-8 core processors affordable, planning for steady growth, undercutting Intels scheme.

>that FX-8350 any good? $90 for 8
It was the best AMD had of the FX series. But that was a while ago.