Audiophiles say that ssds improve sound quality

audiophiles say that ssds improve sound quality

thoughts?

Attached: ssdteardown-5-100682870-orig[1].jpg (2048x1356, 2.34M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=L34S4Tt1EuQ
youtube.com/watch?v=ipZY0qGrA9Y&list=PUs5A6Gg74iPHyTFJh69w-RA&index=2
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It's called relational velodensity.

Never listen to audiophiles.

>have a friend into audiophool trash
>spends thousands on snake oil
>music sounds no better than my $50 speakers and $60 headphones
Never listen to audiophools.

No they don't.

t.audiophile with experience in tech and shit.

>what is rotational velocidensity
Of course SSDs are, especially m.2.

>audiophiles say
No.
Audiophiles sometimes have a superior method of doing things, like they archive their music properly, but they also push a lot of memes like $100 cables and expensive shit DACs that the average user doesn't give a shit about.
SSDs do not improve sound quality.

The problem is that once they get scammed into buying a set of 1k rca cables they'll placebo themselves into believing it sounds better.

I feel like they should all go through mandatory courses explaining how usb and other shit they claim makes a difference works just to shut them up.

Yes, mechanical parts make noise. It's common sense.

They do, to a minor degree. They eliminate noise from disk spins.

While that's fair, when wearing headphones you can't hear that unless you stick your head in your pc case so really it makes no difference.
And the reason why some fools believe it is not because of hdd noise but some placebo shit. Look up sonys high res audio micro sd cards. Yes, that's a thing and it's stupid.

Trying this hard

audiophiles are schizos who think geomagnetic interference in their cabling is haunting their musical fidelity.

>ssds improve sound quality
This has to be a joke right?

Attached: IMG_20180714_092224.jpg (984x720, 64K)

this
I use my own setup for audiophile music, 100% crisp sound
pic related

Attached: 2018_0718_120800_003.jpg (4032x3024, 3.43M)

is this SLC?

>OCZ
lol
fuck no it isn't SLC it's probably like HLC (hex) they fail so fucking fast

doubt

if your motherboard sucks, they could possibly help
my motherboard's audio spits out interference when my mouse tracks

but you get an external DAC in that case, something that does not have any power delivery going through the motherboard (so that means no sound cards either)

No only dumbasses think that
t. NEET who could have interned as a recording engineer at one of the biggest studios

It's rotational velocidensity you dumb fucking pleb.

No, I looked it up, it's 2D MLC with DRAM caching
But the controller is probably shitty

Isnt OCZ dead?

>noise
>digital signals
Is this the peak intelligence of audiophiliacs?

>buy massive SSD because audiophiles said HDD makes spinny.
>spinny not audible through my headphones?
>audio file is loaded into RAM and doesn’t come directly off HDD
>audio file is electronically the same either way, just loads to ram at a different speed.
>but hdd makes spinny that I apparently can’t deal with wearing badass headphones.
>spend $100s of dollars to solve a retarded non issue
Audiophiles are fucking stupid

Post more audiophile memes. I want to see people burning money.

HDDs are noisy, so they do indeed degrade your listening experience.

youtube.com/watch?v=L34S4Tt1EuQ
>audiophiles

yeah, never listen them and their snakeoil.

>audiophiles

Attached: audiophile-audiofiili1.jpg (2800x2100, 1.89M)

they're too different things moron

haha what a dumbass he missed a cable

I want you think looooong and hard about why you look like an idiot.

>they're too different things moron
>too
Also, no. "relational velodensity" is not a thing. Kys.

harddrive make noise
that's why ssd are better for home studio

Audiophiles are almost, but not quite, as gullible as tech-geeks.
It really is pitiful to watch when they meet.

relative*

is that an rpi zero?

ITT : Poorfags with normie shit taste

Yup.
Lots of projects for it involving ausio.

but if you do, listen in lossless

SSD for audio? No, there won't be any difference. However, for video playback some high resolution HDR content could reach a bitrate where you would start to see hiccups depending on the hard disk.

>says too instead of two
>calls people moron
OK then

As long as you're decoupling the audio equipment from electric noise by using optical output between the computer and your DAC, it doesn't matter.

>muh diag chip placement

WHY
Why do autists do this shit?
It wastes mobo space and looks cheap as fuck around the other parralel chips.
Orange pis did this and it looks like sheer chinkery in comparison to odroid or rasp pis

Maybe it was easier to route. (Hidden) vias are expensive nigga.

maybe the palcement itself reduces complexity of routing but it looks like it would alsocomplicate manufacturing processes into a non-standard layout with specialized tooling.

It also looks sloppy why not make all of them diag perpendicular to the center. Why just the single chip in the center all the time?

Yeah, a little. Every electric motor puts out small amounts of electro magnetic interfierence that could be picked up by poorly shielded dac's

Audiophiles are fucking ritualist spending money in implements for their shitty rituals.

youtube.com/watch?v=ipZY0qGrA9Y&list=PUs5A6Gg74iPHyTFJh69w-RA&index=2

Producer here, can confirm that the bits and samples sound clearer on an SSD.

>"audiophile"
>video sound quality is complete garbage

>thinks his (((flacs))) stored are stored in analog
>muh interference and quality because spinny parts
>cosmic rays may interfere with muh quality
digital signals are immune to noise and whatever muh degradation an hdd *may* cause it just cannot pass the steel walls of your case, you dumdum audiofil

.CRINGE

but if you do, add a lofipunk filter