Which shell do you use?

The HolyC shell

based

The only right answer

This one

Attached: poi_gallery_image-image-ded6f7db-552d-4524-bfe4-d2decc4f7f69.jpg (1024x480, 60K)

kek
>even as my bootloader.
can't tell if you meant this part of the post to be a joke but you actually can, see systemd-boot

zsh

How do i get completion

Fish for interactivity.
Dash for all the scripts.
Bash for shit that depends on it.

ksh for everything

The high-explosive one

Attached: eddba6e8caac5ef6fbb9ab81ba982a54.jpg (550x412, 27K)

Attached: VirtualBox_win 31_18_08_2018_21_27_21.png (640x480, 8K)

Dash

github.com/wryun/es-shell

zsh

explorer.exe

Can't believe I had to scroll down for this.

I wish I even knew what the difference between them was

I use bash because it's default, and I wouldn't know what to try or what the others do

Attached: 1532146443180.png (500x700, 120K)

I can't stand any other shell because it doesn't use GNU readline. With this shell, it feels like I never leave GNU Emacs.

Attached: GNU-bash-logo.png (376x159, 9K)

Why? Installed it and lo and behold no colour coding just grey text terminal

fileman.exe

Bloat.

Show me a better shell, then.

rc

:^)

Plan9.
Bell Labs should be fucking gassed. They became irrelevant the second RMS announced GNU. Their "advancements" are laughable at best, even templeos is better than Plan9.

Attached: automatic_trash.gif (400x311, 3M)

Zsh my boy

But it's from Unix 10th edition
GNU is just a shitty ripoff with a """free""" license

SNAP

*buntu

Hotdogcat.com

the emacs eshell for interactive use, sh for scripts

Zsh because why not?

zsh

I just press tab like any other shell

rc

Attached: CopyQ.wZ2100.png (834x503, 42K)

>RMS is to Unix, like Hitler [was] to Nietzsche.

tcsh on FreeBSD, vi for editor, tmux for terminal multiplexer. Most of my work is done on VT, I basically only use xorg for when I need to watch videos.

Fish the non autistic shell™

>using any shell
are you some kind of nerd or something