Firefox isn't bloate-

firefox isn't bloate-

Attached: firefox.png (1443x588, 48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compositions_by_Franz_Schubert
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

said no one fucking ever. at least learn how memes work you prancing la la homoman

implying chrome isnt

Attached: taskmgr_2018-08-18_12-37-43.png (831x1004, 66K)

what's the alternative on windows? chrome? edge? neither of those are any better.

Attached: 1529626185747.png (723x2002, 717K)

>discord

>open big wikipedia page
>firefox stalls and asks me to close the page
>whole browser breaks and has to be restarted with task manager

>said no firefox user ever
t boomer here; been using firefox for years; never had it crash in the past 2-3 years. I have multiple tabs open too and 5-6 plugins.
Then again, I do run linux.

Unused RAM is wasted RAM

>windows
you deserve bloat

Memory leaked ram is also wasted ram.

I opened en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compositions_by_Franz_Schubert (longest article on Wikipedia) and it works fine on Firefox

I've been using it since '03 and in the last couple of years this has been happening on a consistent basis.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Attached: firefox.png (3840x2102, 667K)

>using windows.
>Talks about bloat.
Nigger you deserve that shit.

op is using windows and if you're using windows you don't have a whole lot of choice. i'm using a linux distro.

>midget porn

Attached: 1528778259956.jpg (1440x810, 173K)

Opera
Windows 7 is less bloated than ubuntu or any distro with a (((gnome))) DE

>Windows 7 is less bloated than ubuntu or any distro with a (((gnome))) DE
Implying that everyone uses Ubuntu.

So how's your second day on the internet?

Attached: 0f0fa86c19230cabf2f013af5b3d7b04_1.gif (640x360, 921K)

>Not showing background processes

>using firefox after v48
Really makes me think.

Attached: ff.png (1920x1080, 231K)

First off if you're so concered about memory usage get the fuck off Windows you pleb.

Second, this is likely just a memory leak. Shit but it happens with firefox sometimes. Kill the process then restore the firefox session, should take up a fraction of the ram with the same tabs.

I've honestly never had a mem leak on windows or linux. I also use ubo in hard mode.

What for?

too much javascript for my liking

You'll see what I'm talking about.
More Firefox processes in the background.
Just like Chrome is doing.

?

Attached: Clipboard02.png (3840x2101, 636K)

embrace the china, go UCbrowser

Btw, you do know that the number of processes is shown here right?

The alternative to firefox is downgrading to an older firefox version that worked better than the current one which is objectively shit.
There is also the waterfox option if you really must keep up with the useless ff updates.

W
H
Y

Attached: Capture.png (485x147, 10K)

The current firefox is the best version so long as you know how to use it.

>muh updates
That's why. Mozilla is dead, they can't code for shit now, they're too worried about the shaping dildo in their useless fake cunts to actually start doing something useful for once.

That's waterfox

>t. mozilla tranny programmer

Where do you think the base code comes from? there is only so much you can do to make shit look less shitty, it's still shit after all.

>Dolphin porn
Absolute patrician

My Firefox has never had these memory issues (Windows 7), and I even have disk cache turned off.

No, I just know that defaults are shit.

I have no problems with firefox. And obviously others dont either. You can keep mem down if you want.

Nice b8

>he fell for the 8gb of ram is enough meme
also,
>discord
>youtube
>multiple ebay tabs which may also have embedded videos
>Jow Forums links which may have embedded videos
>probably some other media site
>151 processes
>is surprised when he's near 97% memory usage
learn to use about:memory to figure out where your memory is being used and optionally to free some or use a modern fucking operating system that can better allocate cached memory instead of letting you sit near 97% utilisation

pebkac, try refreshing your profile or creating a new one if you haven't done so since they changed the addon system, it used to be the case that legacy addons could severely shit up the browser profile

>process sandboxing is a bad thing, dumb goyim

Unused RAM is wasted RAM until even more bloat is piled on making it "necessary RAM".

>willingly bloating processes when there is objectively no notable technical nor visible advantage compared to the old method
Truly an useless tranny poster. Also fuck your 64GB RAM. I'm on 8GB and won't upgrade within the near future.

>/V/
>Loli, femdom
>Jew tube
>Evanescence

Gtfo

Chrome and Firefox eat up just as much memory on Linux.

Unused RAM is disk cache. Go fuck yourself.

mine took about 10 seconds to fully load but works fine.

Attached: wut.png (1637x327, 110K)

>this is bad
>OH YEAH, WELL, THE ALTERNATIVE IS BAD TOO HEH I WIN
I will never understand these arguments.

>10 seconds
What the fuck are you using?

Attached: 2018-08-18 18-02-40.webm (1308x720, 1.5M)

They use custom CSS for dark theme so probably slows down loading a bit

Even so it wouldnt take that much longer unless you have shit hardware or internet.

>we want the multi-process audience
Leaving security up to the OS is fucking retarded.

So is allowing scripts by default. Blocking them mitigates threats greatly.

I used x86 instead x64 version on my x64-system.

For some reason I have linked this kind of argument with apologetics, but I'm not sure that's right anymore.
I guess it is a kind of cognitive dissonance where you're accepting something negative as being okay because there are similar negatives in the alternatives.

In my experience, Firefox runs like an absolute dog once it memory leaks all over the place while Chrome doesn't.
I would like my browsers to use less memory but I'm aware that with the progress of web technologies that isn't really possible.