1366x768

>tfw upgraded from 1024x768 to 1400x1050 on the same laptop

Attached: 441.jpg (284x285, 20K)

the human eye can't see higher than 720p

>960 x 720

Attached: 1530998590654.png (560x600, 619K)

>2560x1600
feels good to not be a low res 16:9 fag

>640 x 480

Attached: .png (455x278, 329K)

>1800x1440

Attached: 319.png (557x605, 227K)

When you're old with cataracts you can't see beyond SD resolution anyway, everything is blurry.

>digital broadcast is still 567p

>4k on 15 inch screens

Attached: FU8R5k7.png (460x282, 185K)

Scaling to 200% is nice and crisp for text

Lenovo used to make an 11'' tablet with a 4k screen. I can't imagine what that looked like

maybe in muttland, here in Europe we have fullHD

Attached: 1526143649161.jpg (750x850, 123K)

Fairly sure most TV broadcasts, even here in Europe, are 1080i or 720p.

>1280 x 1024

Attached: TUMBLR.png (579x450, 380K)

You can still find 32" tv with 720p screens.

Depends on the broadcaster. Lots of them save bandwidth by reducing the horizontal resolution so they can lower the bitrate further. A 1080i channel may actually be something like 1440x1080 or even 1280x1080. SD is even worst with many channels being 544x576, even seen some as low as 352x576.

>$currentyear
>32" tv with 720p screens
>enough people still buy this shit to make it profitable enough to produce them

Attached: 1533313587572.gif (240x180, 815K)

I have a 37" 720p TV.

No intention to get a higher resolution TV because Although I have heard Formula-1 is broadcast in actual 4K which could be pretty neat with the nice slomo's.

>1360x768

Attached: thumb.gif (240x149, 974K)

your image is 600x400 .. next

Attached: 130850663434.gif (508x306, 1017K)

1024x768 is superior who needs widescreen.

internet is literally designed for 1024x768 because of mobile btw if you don't know. that way it works on all the pov office computers/old computers and also works on 1080p phones.

95% of Jow Forums neckbeards with garbagepads.

some websites have pushed it up abit now thou. where like the core content of the site fits on 1024x768 or 1080across but adverts and bullshit get pushed to the side and off screen on thous devices.

using 1024x768 is basically free adblocker on most modern sites now. even if I upgrade to a 1080p or 4k 500hz LCD I think ill keep a 1024x768 monitor for reading trashy add filled news/websites.

16:9 instead of 16:10

Attached: Clint-Eastwood-disgust.gif (300x300, 1.46M)

the fuck did you say bitch?

Attached: workspaces.png (4104x770, 660K)

its the supreme shitcoding/text editing/reading format. i can smell that youre an underaged redditor from 2000 miles away

In my country (germany) most channels send in 480p and 720p is the "HD" channels so i really dont understand why someone would find FHD on a tv as necessity here. i used to use my fhd tv as a second monitor, but ive recently got a few HP LP2465 monitors from work for FREE and so i guess im set for life now. once you tried 1920x1200 you can never go back

If it's still 24/30FPS it's still trash. Old movies were filmed on super8/analog films, that meant movement lead to smeary/blurry frames which look pleasignly smooth to the eye. Since everything is being filmed digitally nowadays, that "disadvantage which is an advantage, really" got lost and we're being stuck with choppy 'reality tv'-like visuals.

Attached: smooth analog 24fps vs choppy digital 24fps.png (1000x750, 23K)

Serious question but who buys a TV to watch cable TV instead of movies/series? Cable TV is shitfucked in terms of video/audio quality and in terms of actual content.

Boomers. Literally and figuratively.

>my phone has a higher res than my monitors

I kicked my dresser in a fit of rage and my 32" 720p TV tumbled off. Good riddance I guess.

Attached: 109840930.jpg (400x400, 26K)

CCD's aren't off during non-sampling. There's some sampling loss rate, but it's not that bad. There's a reason why brightness goes down at higher framerates, when they could just amplify the signal harder if they wanted to.

Digitally generated content, sure. But most tv shows aren't. I wonder how many movies/tv shows that use CGI have noticeable conflict between analog smearing and digital non-smeared effects. Simple enough way to deal with it is scaling down the framerate, from 60->24 or 120 to be better.

shutters still work the same way and do not change the blurriness of each frame
digital vs analog has nothing to do with this, go shoot a digital camera outside with a shutter speed of 2 seconds and return back with results

Sony made a smartphone with that resolution once. Too bad the only thing that ran at native resolution was video playback.

My laptop's monitor is 12 inches and has a resolution of 1920x1200. 1366x768 is absolute poorfag tier and nothing should use it anymore. Not even $50 black friday TVs.

>tfw a phone has higher res than peoples laptops and desktops

Attached: Screenshot_20180818-160320_Settings.jpg (1440x850, 129K)

This. Websites look absolutely kino on my 2048x1536 CRT.

>no 3200x1800 30" monitor

>> >2 aspect ratio
what

they don't notice

>what is shutter angle

F1 turned to shit 5 years ago.
Dont bother it still hurts.

>only 120K a year!

Attached: i mean shes actually really cute right here.jpg (1920x1080, 250K)

Attached: 1366x768.jpg (960x768, 92K)

could you just have each pixel only red/green/blue and still see a clear image at that point
720p is enough for phones unless youf nose is touching the screen

>3200x1200
Using 2x Dell 2001FP monitors

It's an S8+

Attached: 1792 x 768.jpg (1024x919, 161K)

Yeah but Max Verstappen made it fun again.
Also next year they are banning the huge wake generating front wings that killed the close racing.

1920x1200 master race here
Really wish someone would make a 16:10 4K monitor (3840x2400), sucks to have to settle for 16:9 if you want a 4K display

It hides the compression artifacts on netflix.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-08-19 at 10.01.17 AM.jpg (1310x870, 192K)

what's a nice screen to put into my X200? My model is ccfl

Attached: 1534597555686.jpg (1440x1409, 135K)

this
still using an xperia z3 compact here

>make pixels half as small to make them twice as big
I bet Jews did this.

Seriously, compare a 1080p laptop to a 4k laptop. I have and the 4k looks way better. Is there a better way to make it look tmas good?

Attached: index.jpg (275x183, 6K)

>640x480

Attached: 1534130482429.jpg (1400x1400, 231K)

From someone using an x220; no
It isn't

god has spoken