Serious question here, is C++ just C with classes...

Serious question here, is C++ just C with classes? If not what else is the difference because I'm learning C now and it seems like the exact same as C++, just with structures instead of classes

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 8K)

those are plusses, user

Some C features is deprecated in C++.
>C does not have classes and objects (C does not support OOP)
>Structures in C cannot have functions
>C does not have namespaces (namespaces are used to avoid name collisions).
>The I/O functions are entirely different in C and C++(ex: printf( ), scanf() etc. are part of the C language).
>You cannot overload a function in C (i.e. you cannot have 2 functions with the same name in C).
>Better dynamic memory management operators are available in C++.
>C does not have reference variables (in C++ reference variables are used in functions).
>In C constants are defined as macros (in C++ we can make use of ‘const’ to declare a constant).
>Inline functions are not available in C.
so yeah it's basically C with classes [spoiler]and that's a good thing[/spoiler]

>Structures in C cannot have functions
what are function pointers?

that's encapsulating a pointer, not a function. regardless, what point are you even trying to make?

function pointers

Attached: diggoo.png (211x260, 95K)

if you put function pointers in structs in C, you're doing C wrong.

should have learned C then C++
it provides a lot of insight on why they added the things they add
saying C++ is just C with Classes(which was it's original name) is an understatement
the things C++ add being good or not is up to debate though

>>Inline functions are not available in C.
what year are you from pal?

C can do conts but it's just a promise to the compiler and the programmer that the data won't be changed

That's all it does