Intel's GPU in 2020 won't need ray tracing

The rays will trace it.

Attached: file.png (970x639, 406K)

>in 2020
AHAHAHAHAHA

they are nothing without printers though

Better they own their own printer than be like nvidia and order out to Kinkos Taiwan.

INTEL SUPERGPUS BY 2020

Intel Super GPU by 1997!
I mean 1998!
I mean shit, we're focusing on IGP now.
Intel super GPU by 2005!
I mean 2006
I mean 2007
I mean it's actually a Xeon co-processor

Intel GPU by 2020

The cycle continues.

The only reason they haven't demolished the incompetent AMD and the monopoly NVIDIA on GPUs is that these two are patent hogging (they had to make multiple deals with them to make an iGPU).

But intel does the same hogging with AMD on the CPU space. The only reason they are allowed to exist is that they're all American.

>It's ATi and nVidia's fault that i740 and Larrabee were failures

They didn't make only gayming machines with these designs since unlike GPUs they were more programmable (slower for gaming, but better in many other fields); the Xeon Phi was a literal success and powered the fastest supercomputer of that time.

I suspect the true reason they didn't go early on pure GPU designs was patent hogging from the other two. We know they had multiple deals with both of them to even make iGPUs. 2020 probably has some good patents expiring (they last 20 years).

>this is what conservatives think a free market should be like

Trump is literally a socialist though (the nazis were nationalist-socialists too).

True economy is liberal in those things. With protectionism you kill it.

protectionism has nothing to do with socialism, or central planning, unless you also want to define having patents, any regulation at all, or even a government at all as such,

It's the same result because the nazis protect "the nation", while the communists protect "the party".

In the end both extremist sides have the same result, being selfish cunts for their own.

>protectionism is extremist

are you an anarcho-capitalist? otherwise you're a hypocrite

It's extremist because it's nationalism. Why the fuck should I care if a lazy cunt is poor just because he belongs in the same "nation" as me.

Fuck him. If he is trash he should be poor. It's exactly the same with communists wanting all lazy party members to be wealthy.

ok, you didnt answer the question so obviously youre just a faggot nigger and probably a jew as well

>Trump is literally a socialist though
No he's literally not.
He's the personification of a clueless neoliberal moneybag, exactly like all other so-called major politicians. You clearly can't distinguish between the production of political entertainment signs and legitimate policies.
>but neolibs only exist in america!
Who told you that, happy neolibs I suppose? The truth is, they run everything from China to Chile as long as the current economical architecture stays intact, and hell, they make sure it does.
And by the way, the Nazis were 0% socialists politically, and didn't hide the fact that they used the word solely as a rhetorical means to attract wider working class masses. It's like saying that North Korea is democratic because it has the words 'democratic' and 'people's' in its name.

The trays will race it.

You think it'll support FreeSync?

I know he's a hypocrite, to be honest I mainly talk about the persona are some of his idiot followers see it.

Nice feature request to be honest. Though I heard it's inferior to gsync.

...

im waiting till this GPU release until I upgrade from 1060 level hardware. its going to be lol if intel just decimate amd and nvidia being apart of that is to epic to miss out on

>I suspect the true reason they didn't go early on pure GPU designs was patent hogging from the other two
Except you'd be plainly wrong if you did even the most cursory research.

i740 failed because Intel were clueless and pushed ideas that simply wouldn't ever work.
Larrabee failed because Intel worked out that drivers are in fact hard and that a full-spec larrabee couldn't beat GTX285 even drawing twice the power.

Muh real socialism

Shut up faggot no one cares

It isn't, but g-sync is typically better due to implementation.
From a standards pov, they're no better than each other.
In reality freesync being good is entirely dependent on the scaler not being total ass, which it is 70% of the time.
g-sync uses nVidia's scaler so they can ensure quality 100% of the time, but that has a huge added cost.

they are going to be shit and you know it.

POO IN THE JOO SUPERPOOWER 2020

You're been brainwashed.