Nvidia RTX 2080

why do their new cards have 16 pins? do these new cards double as room heaters or something?

fucking insane.... these things are gonna be fire hazards.

Attached: 1526344586036.jpg (1240x957, 126K)

Other urls found in this thread:

evga.com/products/product.aspx?pn=08g-p4-6286-kr
wccftech.com/ray-traced-battlefield-v-runs-sub-30-4k/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

my 1080ti has 16 pins too...

Attached: FTW3-EN.png (690x557, 454K)

the goytraicing is too hot

Attached: 1080fire.png (1280x720, 1.14M)

kek'd

why is that 1080ti so big I noticed the MSI armor is big like that as well. does it actually make them better they go for like 100$ less than regular size 1080ti.

It's fermi 2.0

Attached: DlNCUotXcAAW7M2.jpg (1100x648, 77K)

kek

omega kek

Attached: 20180820_212812.jpg (2420x3226, 2.24M)

>exploded at idle
Kek'd

It has a bigger die than the gtx 1080ti .... wasted on meme tech

16 pins but still only 6 positive wires.

7nm will take care of that. It's coming in 1-2 years.

1440p 60fps with Raytracing will be a reality by then.

4k Raytracing at 60fps is still far away.

It's called voltage drop you fucking retards.

I have the SC2 which is the 2nd best EVGA compared to the FTW3. It was cheaper and just as good imo. I'd get the sc2

I really don't get the point of 8pin.
Both 6 and 8 pin have the same amount of conductors so its not like your getting any less resistance

>because ray tracing is scaled by monitor resolution

LOL

It's just a sense pin that tells the card it is safe to draw that amount of current from the PSU.

>electronics require electricity

ALERT THE PRESS

the chips with high ASIC quality are going to boost themselves to the moon

lmfao
they renamed their fucking line because they're THAT scared of amd
let's look like the rx line guys!!!!! omfg we're so DOOOOOOOMED!!!!!

I mean, my GTX 770 4GB card has 16 pins too.

oh no 16 pins instead of 14 it's over

>oh no 16 pins instead of 14 it's over
my 1060 has 6 pins.

Rays are per pixel, you retard.

the mid and higher cards used to have 8+6 pins
>2080 TI
>250W TDP stock, 265W TDP OC Founders Edition
it's nothing crazy, Jow Forums has too many shitty shitposts and shillposts, this isn't interesting to me, fuck all of you

some 1080 Tis have 2x8 pin too, and the stock 1080 Ti has 8+6 pin, whatever, faggots

evga.com/products/product.aspx?pn=08g-p4-6286-kr
>GTX 1080
>Requirements
>Two available 8-pin or 6+2pin PCI-E power dongles
fag

Are we ever going to get high end components that look like components again? Computers look like bosozuko cars now.

Attached: bosozoku.jpg (820x440, 123K)

my old as fuck hd 7970 has 16 pins
are you retarded or what

>that reservoir

Attached: Snap+another+one+into+the+cringe+compilation+_e0e36618d75782e808abe03cf7677f45.jpg (420x420, 45K)

May I introduce: The PowerColor Devil 13 Dual Core R9 290x

it's also a triple slot card at the front, look it up

Attached: file.png (600x328, 338K)

I kinda want one, out of morbid curiosity.

Attached: file.png (600x352, 266K)

>hd7970
The last good AMD gpu.

Am I supposed to be revolted?

Attached: 10030004.jpg (3620x5430, 2.91M)

Attached: 20180820_212812~2.jpg (293x253, 20K)

>3 slots
>only 4 outputs
wasted space

Don't forget Powercolor not only made this card once, but twice. Okay technically the second version is 2x390 but meh.

>YFW need a 1000w power supply just for a mobo, gpu and single ssd.

btw, imho this is probably first GPU that actually looks cool.
not a gayman tho

It's because it isn't an over the top lamborghini style gpu isn't it, boomer

They have noticed that if customer who wants premium has to choose between less and more pins, he automatically chooses more pins.

Same thing as with modern cars having bigger and more powerful engines while the car can never utilize them on the first place because speed limits both by law and in ECU.

yeah but only lightning,reflections and shadows which have their own scaling factor. and what about the rest of the scene

You need more pins to power more gigarays because playing in a dark room means the GPU has to kick out more light to create the scene.

It s 75 from the motherboard and 300 from the 8 pins ( 150 each ) . The gpu has a 260 tdp . And the total power delivered is 375 . Better headroom for OVerclock .

>draw so much current that you have to ask your mum for permission

>not the 290X

so basically they are bigger why thou? made in factory that cant solder stuff as small? what about VRM and stuff thous chips can change between cards.

just kinda annoed because I buy 400$ SFF case designed to fit these huge cards and don't think ill ever get one because they look like cheap trash. while "mini" 1080ti cards cost 100$ more than normal. (thou the mini use worse components as well)

>why thou
All other factors being equal (contact with the components, airflow, rib design), bigger heatsinks can both absorb more heat and dissipate it faster. You can also use bigger fans which are generally quieter. And bigger heatsinks require bigger housings and more slots.

the larger pcb is because its cheaper to make bro its obv.

>speed limits
>living in a cucked country

8-pin connectors are 150watts each so this is a literal 300watt housefire.

Is it safe to run cards with 16 pins power ports like that? I used a 1060 3gb with a single 6 pin power connector, these big cards seem dangerous. Kinda apprehensive of buying a 1080ti now, got a good deal for it. Please tell me guys is it safe, I have an RM750X PSU.

No, it will kill you and rape your dog.

no, it was the other way around.

I'm pretty impartial to both GPU manufacturers, but if you're going to flame the new RTX chips, then we can't forget that Vega 64 has a 300 watt tdp, and is slower than a 1080/ti.

>pic related
>some kid launches minesweeper on his new vega 64

Attached: wildfires.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=618&h=410&crop=1.jpg (618x410, 118K)

Im curious whats powerconsumption with and without. Gaytracing
My guess is +30%

16 pin is more aesthetic than 8 pin.

8 pin just doesn't look right. People don't associate 8 pin with efficiency but poverty and weakness.

stop hating on raytracing there is a video of 1080ti playing the raytracing alpha of BFV and it still gets 60+

your random amd card will be able to support it at decent frames as well. just it will make the RTX cards a little faster at max settings its not a big deal.

every gpu gen is like 20-25% raytracing and might make this gen a 30% upgrade instead..

your hating on some thing dumb its not a exclusive feature and runs fine on old cards.

>stop hating on raytracing there is a video of 1080ti playing the raytracing alpha of BFV and it still gets 60+
lol'd. there won't be RT 60fps games for another 4-5 years.

if you're talking about fully ray traced then give it another 10+ years, what we have now is still very impressive and an actual improvement

>what we have now is still very impressive and an actual improvement
but too bad it's totally useless right now. you're basically paying for nothing and paying a tax for something that's 10 years away.

plenty of games are already implementing RTX features and there's more to come

Attached: 1526683149188.jpg (963x1024, 82K)

>plenty of games are already implementing RTX features and there's more to come
no one will play 34fps slideshows.

The reference 1080Ti doesn't. So either Nvidia are gunning for overclockers with the founders edition 2080Ti or it's a house fire

nice meme shill, they're already selling well in preorders and benchmarks will be plentiful by september 20

the founders edition is OC with 265W TDP instead of 250W TDP on the reference card, it's not a big deal, the high-tier card has always been 250W+

will there ever be a card like the 750 ti again that gets all of its power through the PCI-E slot?

>nice meme shill, they're already selling well in preorders and benchmarks will be plentiful by september 20
the very fact that they never released benchmarks and released bullshit specs instead should tell you everything about the RT performance, idiot.
and you're the one shilling shit.

yeah ok buddy

Attached: NV-GeForce-RTX-2080-Performance.jpg (2560x1440, 124K)

Attached: NV-GeForce-RTX-2080-Performance-Games.jpg (2560x1440, 367K)

>60fps
lagfest lol

>0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2

What kind of tomfuckery is this?

kys retarded shill, that's at 4K HDR on highest settings, 1440p will be fast as fuck

relative performance...

underrated

Attached: 1515423637792.png (538x630, 379K)

you have a aesthetic aluminum computer we get it mine will be copper or black or nickel and superior thou. just you wait!

watch the video you retard its on Jow Forums the game isn't 100% RT its just in reflections and 1080ti handels it fine. 100% of these first gen RT games will run fine on older cards and I doubt we will even ever have 100% RT.

it works at 60+fps on a 1080ti you idiot your going to be able to run RT on your non raytraing or even AMD cards. that's my point. your freaking out over some thing being "exclusive" that's not.

RTX is prob only going to get like a 5-10fps increase with RT on compared to other non RT cards. the demos showing the RTX being 6x as good as the 1080ti at Raytracing didn't even specify if that RTX was a 20,000 Quadro or not.

chances are the RTX gamer cards are not actually that much better at raytracing than a 1080/1080ti or vega 52/64

actual numbers.

Attached: 1515445566376.jpg (1833x2048, 208K)

>100% of these first gen RT games will run fine on older cards

A driver gimping a year keeps the goyim in fear.

A dual core r9 should be a 295

>all new tech that i can't wrap my head around is useless

Attached: 1506610021596.jpg (645x729, 46K)

the benchmark showing RTX being 6x faster at raytracing and saying that demo ran on a "single rtx card" or saying the epic engine demo ran at 60fps while on 1080ti it was 30. didn't say what RTX card was used. that was prob the RTX titan or RTX 8000 Quadro that's a 20,000$ card.

RTX cards are prob 2x better with raytracing turned on than 1080ti.

so a 1080ti with max raytraing in BFV is going to get 67fps at 4k and a
2080ti with max raytracing in BFV is going to get 74fps at 4k.

you guys just eat all the fake shit nvidia said and now fighting against it. dont fight again raytracing its cool new DX12 feature thats not nvidia exclusive and you dont need RTX to run it that was just a manipulated message.

Vega 64 will prob get like 64fps in bfv at 4k max with raytracing on.

who cares.

>actual numbers
>nvidia slides
I say this every GPU release, but Nvidia's fucking marketing slides are more unreliable than alex jones

less tdp than vega 64

Don't forget that's at 4K with G-sync and HDR where the GDDR6 is what's making the difference. At 1440p or 1080p SDR it will be very close.

>All those pins probably worth nothing since ultimately it comes down to silicon lottery how well the card will overclock.

Attached: tracing.jpg (1100x648, 105K)

>GPP
>"oh we don't want to cause any confusion to customers from vendors using the same branding for our cards and other card."
>"so we'll keep the original well known and trusted branding and you'll have to make new branding for the other guys."
>INTRODUCING THE NEW RtX 2080!

The GPP was all about transparency user, which is exactly why Nvidia refused to talk about it.

Attached: 2gtpru.jpg (478x350, 28K)

hey idiot it's time for a talk again

"For example, currently the resolution for each ray is the same as the chosen internal resolution. That means 4K if you’re displaying the game at 3840×2160. DICE expressed their intention to give users fine control over the raytracing implementation. Lowering the raytracing resolution (while keeping the internal resolution at 4K) or the amount of rays shot per pixel."

wccftech.com/ray-traced-battlefield-v-runs-sub-30-4k/

You fuckholes act like it's not hybridized and the other 90% of the processing isn't raster based.

>THAT scared of amd
Yup, they must be scared shitless that AMD will release Navi a year and half later and it will almost, but not quite, reach Turing performance for the same price.

There will be a binned and unbinned variant of two vega models

2,000 shader budget vega will be gtx1070~1080 equivalent for 150-250$ its going to have more bandwidth than 1080 and clock to 2ghz and beyond due to 7nm node

4,000 shader vega will be faster than the 1080ti and rtx 2080. It will have same bandwidth as 2080ti but be a bit slower. This unbinned card will be 500-600$ they will have a binned card with cuts on memory/bus and sell it in the 350-400$ price range this will be the card everyone buys because it will be 1080ti equivalent for 400$ or less.


Navi is the game changer Its going to be a 4x2,000 or 4x4,000 shader design ( or both) and will be the only line of cards with HBM memory.

Attached: Rough Outline of Navi.png (1914x961, 56K)

BUY MORE
SAVE MORE