>github.com
why do JS cucks feel the need to politicize everything?
Why do JS cucks feel the need to politicize everything?
>There is one thing I have control over, and that's open source.
>didn't add a clause for ICE themselves
>hey let's effectively kill this project we all contribute to
>yay!
gov doesnt use js shit
yeah, that's what i noticed too haha
esoteric brainletism at its finest
They Don't Think It Be Like It Is But It Do
>
because they're cucks and they get off to virtue signaling. also, this no longer makes their project free software lol
desu the companies listed produce proprietary software, so it doesn't really matter :^)
>legally unactionable clause
Really put the screws to them with this one
>
today on "user is remarkably naive", this.
Hate to break it to you but everyone uses JS garbage these days.
>This license only applies to future versions, you're free to use old versions that do not contain this clause.
I don't use JS in any hands on way, so I have no fucking clue how important this is.
So what's the likely outcome?
Software who demands political fealty for usage doesn't count as open source.
It seems like a fork or replacement package would be an obvious thing to do.
And how important is this package anyways?
>- "Microsoft Corporation"
this nigga banning microsoft on a site they own
why doesn't he do something that requires some sacrifice and stop using the products of those companies himself.
fucking poofter
Tfw the retard doesn't understand that the clause isnt enforceable since it's name dropping instead of just banning in use for adding deportation
Why cant fucking weblets learn2law
Löl
Kek
wait, you are right.... they are banning microsoft on their own website.
OMEGALUL.
akatechis based and redpilled
someone with a twitter account point this out to the retard and invite him to leave github
Try visiting the ACA marketplace site with JS disabled.
>T-thanks, Obama