Which is correct?
int* px, py, pz
int * px, py, pz
int *px, py, pz
Which is correct?
Chase Ward
Michael Garcia
[CODE]
int *px;
int py, pz;
[/CODE]
/thread
Austin Wilson
Yes
Isaac Martinez
>/threading your own post
Cameron Sanders
all of them compile to the exact same code
you must specify a pointer for all variables separately
Cooper Martin
the third one of course
the first one might make you think all of them will be pointers, while the third one makes it clear its only a property of px
the second one is rarted
Grayson Johnson
None are because py and pz will be integers instead of pointers to int and you're also missing semicolons
Lincoln Price
degenerate
Angel Wood
int *px;
int *py;
int *pz;
Thomas Baker
I prefer option three, but I might be a brainlet so what do I know, anyway?
Isaac Carter
but then py and pz are pointers
Ian Butler
p obviously stands for pointer and OP wants all of them to be pointers.
Christian Clark
does he tho?
Logan White
>px is a pointer
>py and pz aren't
What does the p stand for then?
Either way OP is stupid.
Owen Adams
>Naming variables coherent names
What kind of degenerate were you birthed from?
Andrew Ward
int*
It's an intpointer. writing "int *" or "int *name" is basically like writing "cha r" or "cha rname"
Charles Foster
maybe it was a trick, to see who would adhere strictly to given assignment
never underestimate OPs, they are generally sensitive intelligent people that respond positively to quality replies
Gavin Jackson
TIL writing int *fa, *gg, *ot is the same as writing cha rfa, rgg, rot
Ayden Rodriguez
that''s how it should have worked, but that's not how it does
I'm convinced that people who write int* ptr are weenies who've never used a function pointer
Jaxon Sanchez
>using a language with pointers
Isaiah Roberts
maybe you could tell us how you would design a system programming language fittinng the niche of portable one-level-above-assembly without pointers?
Carson Sullivan
>using a language without arrays
Christopher Perez
>using arrays
Lucas King
the bottom, py and pz aren't pointers and the top one treats pointers like a type
Josiah Rogers
it's like you're unemployed or something
Kayden Mitchell
int* px;
int py;
int pz;
The only correct answer.
Jose Phillips
that's something an op would say