Are there any tool that shows disk usage for Linux that is fast like WizTree?

Are there any tool that shows disk usage for Linux that is fast like WizTree?

Attached: wiztree%20treemap.jpg (1596x887, 367K)

qdirstat.
you would've found it easily with google.

I'm using it right now.
No, its not even close to the speed of wiztree
Keep in mind that wiztree != windirstat, the later is slow too.

Get a faster hard drive.

Like always, linux have shitty software compared to windows.

Nigger kdirstat is the original dirstat, also windirstat is slow because it has to work on NTFS shit, any disk usage tool on linux wins by default because is not handicapped by the FileSystem.

Attached: Screenshot_20180831_192138.png (593x464, 113K)

What if I want to scan a NTFS partition on linux

Nobody is stopping you, what if you want to scan an EXT4 partition on windows?

Bullshit, just scanned a 20GB ext4 partition that linux is installed through Disk Usage Analyzer and it took more than what it takes to scan 2TB of NTFS on wiztree

>du -h /home | sort -hr | less

You took the bait. is antagonizing people into providing more responses. They're almost certainly OP.

I know is bait, the whole thread is bait, I just wanted to point out how shit NTFS is.

Btw, you bumped the thread to page 1, remember to sage.

>can't find a tool better than one available on windows
>ITS BAIT

ncdu is good

There's Filelight, which is fairly similar.

Attached: Screenshot_20180831_214608.png (939x734, 103K)

NTFS filesystems on linux run in userspace. It's going to be slower when you mount an NTFS disk.

Use native EXT4 if you want more speed, it will also have better random I/O as the linux kernel is better tuned for HDD performance than NT.

what the fuck is wiztree? i always used windirstat, which works fine on linux

By that screenshot it's literally the open source code of WinDirStat turned into a donationware/scamware. It probably has some malware in it as well.

windirstat

this

baobab

ncdu

Are you fucking retarded? Its like WinDirStat, but way faster. You scan a 2TB drive in about 3 seconds.

baobab just werks for me.

so sequoiaview?

space analysis speed has nothing to do with the size if the drive, you idiot

it is mainly dictated by the number of files on the drive, since the program needs to go through all of them

if you scan a 5GiB drive with Linux installed, compared to a 200TiB with a bunch of porn on it, the 5GiB scan will be slower

kdirstat

or k4dirstat if you're qt

k4dirstat is also FAST.

Attached: k4dirstat fast.png (1944x1260, 580K)

> KDE software
based and redpilled

see 2x 1TB HDDs
2x 120GB SSDs
240GB SSD
500GB SSD
512GB SSD

4.7s