Chrome removes HTTP HTTPS from address bar

ayy lmao

>Starting with Chrome 69, Chrome omits http and https from the address. and replaced "secure" with a lock icon for https sites.
>http:// -- removed from Chrome. Chrome displays an (i) icon and eventually a "not secure" label.
>https:// -- removed from Chrome. Chrome displays a "secure" label, eventually a "lock icon". Plans are underway to remove the lock icon in the future as well.
ghacks.net/2018/09/03/what-happened-to-http-and-https-in-chrome/

brainlet. the browser

Attached: tSzha7n.gif (840x629, 96K)

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/pyllyukko/user.js
github.com/ghacksuserjs/ghacks-user.js/
spyware.neocities.org/articles/chrome.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

> type in local network host name
> goes to google instead
This browser is retarded.

Did they remove it at all? I think that prefixes should be shown when you click at the address bar.

Why is Chrome implementing Australis? Especially after Firefox dumped it because it sucked?

hmm. let me enable it on config for a sec...oh wait you can't do that on chrome!
lmaooooooooooooo

What's the issue? Instead of https you get a padlock.
They do. Check the webm.

I mean they're being shown and aren't completely removed.

The issue is text jumps when you edit it.

good retards can still look for the lock and the bar is leaner

Then what is this all about? I'm pretty sure almost every browser does that nowadays.

Why are people still using Chrome?

Attached: 86543859431020.png (396x381, 134K)

That's stupid indeed if it happens and should be fixed.

>what is chrome://flags

>yandex
Russian detected

Attached: russian hacker.jpg (449x449, 63K)

Me no understand why adress has hpp in front. Me not like see thing me don't understand when me fap to bififul fat ladies. New gromu is good gromu.

Attached: 1513997067279.png (645x729, 93K)

firefox does this too, for awhile now too.

>Plans are underway to remove the lock icon in the future as well.
>hurr durr no confuse the dumdums
>hurr durr let's change random shit that dumduma will notice
That lock icon made me so much money, it's not even funny, everyone I sold a site to asked me if I can get a lock icon appear on their website, they all paid €50 extra for it and an extra €5/month for the hosting with the lock icon. I basically use my webhost's autossl and setup a htaccess file to redirect from http to https.

browser.urlbar.trimURLs

a piece of shit.

Just OP being a faggot.
Firefox at least does it as in v67 but eventually it will move to the last.

Good, HTTPS should become the "default", and extra attention paid only to when HTTP is used.

"Secure" was bad wording for HTTPS on Google's part. It should've said "Encrypted", because HTTPS != secure & safe like Chrome used to lead you to believe.

Goddamnit, forgot the pic.

Attached: chrome-https.png (640x310, 6K)

how will firefox treat non-https pages then eventually?

post a better browser

> inb4 muh privacy

netscape navigator

DUDE WHO THE FUCK CARES IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCES IT LIKE HAVING THE POWER BUTTON ICON VS AN ON OFF SWITCH

security.insecure_connection_text.enabled
security.insecure_connection_icon.enabled

Doesn't matter:

Why does the text in the sometimes jump and sometimes not when he clicks on the adress bar? That's the only problem I have with it

Are there any good browsers left that res0ect my privacy
NOT FIREFOX

Internet Explorer

PaleMoon probably.

I use Inox and qutebrowser

something like that

Attached: ffinshttp.png (286x158, 7K)

Based Firefugs

Attached: Fx.png (708x587, 58K)

i really do not fucking care as long as they keep the lock. the lock is the only thing normies can comprehend to sorta mitigate some mitm/phishing attacks

This shit happens with Edge too. You can't click on a specific place in the URL because it jumps as soon as you click.

>using chrome
>not running your own DNS for your network
pleb

Attached: Screenshot_20180903_152856.png (512x392, 40K)

This

What DNS server are you running

it's just BIND/named running on my Ubuntu 16.04 server which also serves DLNA content.

Hasn't everyone moved to drill nowadays?

Yeah, I'm using BIND as well. Was just curious about other setups.

no idea. dig just works. not real clear on some things like encryption, but when I'm just checking for the server response and TTL it does its job.

>brainlet. the browser

Absolutely, but wait, within a year or two every other mainstream browser will have copied that behaviour.

I run unbound with some local-data statements now. It comes with OpenBSD which I use for my router.

NSD is way more pleasant than BIND. Knot is good for DNSSEC handling and for zone editing with knotc. Those are authoritative only. Dnsmasq is good too.

>chrome
>no volume slider for videos
braindead devs confirmed

Attached: 1535834323358.png (265x142, 1K)

This. Chrome has always been fucking shit & retarded.

Literally nothing to do with DNS
Please leave g

Seriously, fuck Mozilla. One may be able to fix most, but by far not all, retarded decisions they have made in about:config, but I'm not sure I still remember everything I have edited, which makes setting up a Firefox for a new user something I absolutely wouldn't do anymore.
Couldn't guarantee they get a browser that does what they want and doesn't constantly stab them in the back.
I want the Mozilla from the age of Firebird back. Better times.

>google interprets a host name as a search term because it's not a qualified domain name
>a BIND server with a locally hosted zone would easily resolve this issue
>not DNS
Please leave \g\

this so much
the fact that this exists says enough: github.com/pyllyukko/user.js

Bypassing Chrome's shit faults doesn't make their error related to DNS. They're a fucking shit browser. That's why it has issues.

Dear Mr. Putin,
Please make us a 'Yandex' themed icon set or XFCE. Spaciba, anonymous

WHAT IN THE FUCK IS THAT TAB DESIGN

i'm not arguing chrome isn't shit. however, you also shouldn't expect shit on your local network to work correctly by just using host names. windows does this, but local network discovery is not always reliable.

the only reliable option is to make a local zone.

>this retard doesnt know how to look at modified settings
>this retard doesnt know you can import your saved settings
Fuck off you tech illiterate

Leave

>privacy and security options are bad
Ok, Google.

github.com/ghacksuserjs/ghacks-user.js/

Yeah this is the dumbest shit ever. They don't care anymore about desktop though because they make the most money on mobile. They even released a blogpost

>Can't use IP addresses at all
Go back

>if it's not about cell phones and chink shit, it's not gee related

He's right though. Chrome only uses your input as a search term when it doesn't think it's a valid hostname.

If you had set up your local DNS then you wouldn't have that issue because your input would resolve, and so Chrome wouldn't use it as a search term.

You're so fucking stupid you can't realize the fact chrome can't take a straight IP and go to it without http in front. So fuck right off to recover leddit where you belong you dumb piece of shit

Why are they hiding the protocol?? Are they going to be secretly releasing their own proprietary protocol?

you can't go to an ip address in chrome without http in front? I wouldn't have known that; I use firefox.

Is that what you've been sperging about? how does this have anything to do with rebbit? you must be new here and have no other insults. lurk more

The problem is more that I don't remember WHY I set each and every value, and looking that up for 8.5 pages of "user set" configuration values is not something I'll do to install a browser that will stab the new user in the back anyway within a matter of weeks.

With the end of support for ESR52 I'm leaving Firefox anyway.

Read the original post and stop replying you dumb fuck. That's all this fucking conversation is about

works on my machine
and no, i didnt type http:// and then it disappeared, I typed just the ip

Attached: ip.png (249x40, 2K)

>Literally can't read
Go back

spyware.neocities.org/articles/chrome.html

what's bad is that Firefox fucks you in the ass by default. sure you get a bunch of options but the sheer size of that userjs file should tell you how bad things really are. furthermore, options appear, disappear, are renamed and it's impossible for one person to follow up on the immense clusterfuck of dildos mozilla is trying to shove into its users' ani

Doesn't look like it.
In the gif the person is just selecting the URL and pasting the full https URL and pressing enter, which causes the reduction.

>being that retarded
you're on the wrong board kiddo

Learn to read
History doesn't count

>Replying to different people
Not my fault you're retarded

>Warning!
>The page you are visiting is not secure.
>This page does not use encryption technologies to protect your data.
>I understand the risks, visit webpage anyway.

>Learn to read
you keep saying that, but multiple posters have no idea what you're talking about.

please appease us morons and explain what there is to read to complete comprehension of the thread?

Still waiting for the lines of code that make telemetry impossible to disable in firefox to be posted.

>t. butthurt
you're still here I see

>Learn to read
>chrome can't take a straight IP and go to it without http in front
kill yourself okay?

My about:config settings havent changed since I updated to Quantum in Jan. or Feb.

Sure is summer in here. Glad I haven't read any posts yet.
Hopefully Reddit stays in this thread only

>reddo this, reddo that
>leave g, back to reddo
you're trying pretty hard to fit in
but this remains a technology board
and you are a dnslet

>he doesn't use UnGoogled Chromium with all of Google's features removed including auto-suggest, connection to google, default search engine and every other influence and connection to Google that Chromium has
>he gets tag teamed by Alphabet Inc. and it's affiliated advertisers on the daily
It's almost like you're ASKING to get raped by the megacorps.

Attached: 1496086515432.png (421x460, 252K)

>jewgle
>dropped

Attached: 1530301954199.jpg (690x460, 186K)

>Trying this hard
Lol

Chromium

The one in the OP is Chromium.

Still better than Chrome.

>Sharing your IP on Jow Forums

Holy shit are you retarded? Christ you dumb fuck.

Tried out their new design on my one windows laptop. Tabs are rather bulky, making it unsightly when you have a lot of them stacked. While watching a youtube video, it started lagging like crazy, then gave me a BSOD (first ever for that laptop). Not to mention the lack of a volume slider with their new "modern" video player. I don't know what the fuck is going on over there.

Attached: 1528642194974.jpg (600x400, 32K)

Why is displaying the protocol relevant? it doesn't really matter at the end.
You know it's HTTP since it's a fucking web browser. Add a small icon to tell if it's HTTP over TLS or not and you have all the information you need.
Displaying the protocol should be needed when you use less common protocols for a browser (ftp...).

What are you doing with that IP, Mr. Anderson?

Attached: 684444265_1_644x461_przejsciowkausbna380vswietochlowice_rev001.jpg (644x361, 91K)

Who cares? I only use Chrome for Duolingo. Firefox Quantum is great.

>Chrome 69
Haha nice

look, I fucking hate botnet chrome, but if you're gonna make arguments against it, don't use ones that make you sound retarded.
it's a web browser that targets windows users.
it just werks. they don't give a shit about ssl.
and for those that do, you can still clearly differentiate between encrypted and unencrypted connections.

Vivaldi already does it

How long until the address bar is replace with a dropdown menu with only the most popular websites?

After they implement captchas to open chrome and to visit sites.

Microsoft Edge doesn't have this problem.

chrome is amazing idgaf what u nerds care about. it fucking works forever