AMAZON BTFO

HOW WILL THEY EVER RECOVER?

Attached: BEZOS.jpg (1080x1782, 246K)

first for judaism

>*raises unemployment*
heh, nothing personal kid

>Fox News viewer detected

What's the point of high employment if a large chunk are getting social services as if they were unemployed?
Remove the subsidies and remove welfare simultaneously.
The poor will either starve, or we'll see another luddite uprising. Either way it's a win win.

Attached: 1534294935088.webm (1000x837, 1.65M)

I don't even have faux news in leaf land, it actually will increase unemployment simply because companies are that much of kikes

>very profitable company
>gives the US another hegemony on another domain
>employs 306,800 people
>is great for the economy
>the CEO has a lot of money thanks to his fantastic business idea and execution
>HE RICH
>HE BAD MAN
>RICH BAD

>getting social services
Correct, they shouldn't get social services.
Companies can afford to pay them badly BECAUSE they will have some kind of welfare funded by the taxpayer.

>remove safety net for employees
>employees make less money
>company owners continue paying the same amount

Wow, that fixed absolutely nothing you retard.

Maybe the idiot employees will finally learn how to manage their finances.

WE RAISED UNEMPLOYMENT, WHY DID THINGS GET MORE EXPENSIVE!!????

>strawmanning this hard

There are more Trump voters on the government dole than any other group.

There's no reason for the wide gap between employee salaries and executive salaries, corporate cuck

And what goal would you achieve by reducing the quality of life of most people in the US? Are you working for the russians to demote America's status as a world power?

Is this not the same as Bernie's argument?
>cut off social services ("subsidies")
>people can't afford to work there
>people end up quitting
>amazon forced to increase wages and benefits

False.

If people on food stamps weren't allowed to vote, the democrats would lose every election.

Trump is making drug testing and other requirements for people to get social services... Guess what party is against that?

Democrats are against it because it's a waste of money. The amount of money saved by cutting off drug users is less than the amount spent on drug testing. Wait let me use the conservative argument they love to use
>b-b-but muh "all poor people are drug users" NARRATIVE (lol I said it!!!)

Right. Another promise he'll never keep because half of his base is trailer dwelling meth heads.

Drug testing for welfare is just a straight waste of money though.

Bernie the 4 house socialist is a joke

Your position only comes jealousy and envy.
The executives do a very difficult job, that very few people can do.

Employment is abiding under the Supply and Demand rule.

Why is working at McDonalds so badly paid?
Because anyone can do it.

Why is being a top executive so well paid?
Because very, very, very, very few people can do it.

You never studied economics, have you.
If those employees were more valuable, they would be paid more, or someone would offer them to pay them more.
But they are not.
They are not worth more.

If tomorrow you decide that you will pay your executives 30% less, well, ANOTHER company will steal them from you by offering them more money, because they are worth more than that.

You should come to rural Kansas sometime and listen to the heavily government subsidized farmers complain about "those freeloaders on welfare"

>You should come to rural Kansas sometime
kek

People on food stamps are shitskins.
And shitskins don't vote.

>employment at any cost

sorry I don't want to live like a chinese roof jumper

the only problem with this is that people like my grandmother get treated like crack smoking niggers.

I can get a drug kit test that works at the dollar store. Wow so expensive

>Trump is making drug testing and other requirements for people to get social services

And what gains would be made from that?

sounds like we need a global cap on how much they can be paid and a similar rise in the minimum you can pay a lower wage employee

If you don't think companies wouldn't just let them starve if there were no social services then you don't understand America.

What WOULD likely happen is poor people would start murdering the rich once they are starving.

none. and it's not going to happen anyways because laws like that are illegal and have been struck down numerous times. and how do you think his base is going to react when they can't get government benefits because they're addicted to opiates?

they won't. costs shift to consumers and people who may be welfare candidates will likely be discriminated out. it's a lose-lose. It's also funny how this bill only impacts low margin, highly competitive businesses too. lmao. but whatever.

Those are way too inaccurate to be used as any sort of legal judgement.

You'd have to do something like what the military does, where every sample is fed into an quick assay machine which can trigger false positives, and then every positive sample is sent to a lab for GC/MS testing.
This costs at least $100 per test, not to mention the personnel required to run the program.

>The executives do a very difficult job, that very few people can do.
Kek
>capitalist monopolies work under market's rules
>people's worth is based on how much their labour can be exploited by the capitalist
Just kys, corporate cuck

>Your position only comes jealousy and envy.
lol look everyone I'm projecting.jpg
>The executives do a very difficult job, that very few people can do.
The hard work of being born into a wealthy family, going to college for free, and getting a high position in daddy's company right after graduation.

>Employment is abiding under the Supply and Demand rule.
>Why is working at McDonalds so badly paid?
>Because anyone can do it.
>Why is being a top executive so well paid?
>Because very, very, very, very few people can do it.
I get that but there's no reason for the gap to be so wide. What purpose does it serve for 90% of the wealth to be with 10% of the people? Large corporations actively lobby the government to keep minimum wage low and keep welfare in place so they don't have to pay a living wage.

ya ok. because you have great insight at high level management, where every single thing you do can make or break a company. Not even a capitalist shilling cuck but i'm not dumb enough to think being CEO is somehow easy mode.

another quality technology thread

Attached: idiot.png (499x338, 38K)

Actually that is a very healthy initiative. I am extremely surprised it comes from the left.

Too bad gubmint handouts even exist, but since they do its a good practice to stop the companies from sucking taxpayer's money.

>This costs at least $100 per test, not to mention the personnel required to run the program.
We can't properly fund public schools but we have plenty of money for this!

are you using the chink's definition of employment here? if you're satisfied with making $10 a day then go ahead and sign up for your nearest amazon warehouse.

>Kindergarten level understanding of economics detected

Only rich guys like BERNIE are acceptable to the blue sheep. Funny thing is Bezos stumps for the left hard and they still turn on him.

Attached: bernie-sanders-Lake-Champlain-summer-home.jpg (580x436, 64K)

How does the janitor generate dividends for shareholders? The CEO is worth whatever the shareholders vote to pay him/her. Until they have a couple bad quarters in a row and resign under pressure. Then the cycle starts over.

You know, rank and file salaried office drones often work harder than the management. When you're a manage of higher, your job starts to consist of doing almost nothing except playing solitaire in your office and occasionally attending meetings or making phone calls. If the manager makes a poor leadership decision, it's his underlings who are to blame and left to clean up the mess "going forward".

I'm all for slashing military spending, but cutting drug tests for the military is probably not the best idea. Personnel routinely handle weapons of war, and mistakes due to being high can cost lives and hundreds of millions of dollars.

If you wanna be disgusted, look into the military procurement and contracting system. So much money is wasted there because of all these bullshit hoops that have to be jumped through and mandatory selection pressures. For example, one of the contractors I was working with proudly displayed on their website that the company was a "Economically-Disadvantaged Minority, Woman, Disabled Veteran owned company".

The owner was some fat ambiguously brown woman who served 10 years in the Navy and probably has a bad knee or something so she's now "disabled".

Amazon has brought more good into this world just the past five minutes than Bernie Sanders has in his whole life.

This is only true of middle management. The people at the top and the people at the bottom are absolutely decimated with work, but the people in the middle tend to survive with little effort. They are not responsible for either coming up with ideas, nor are they responsible with implementing ideas, they just handle things like doing the basic quarterly calculations to see how close the team was to the "leadership" targets.

>US is in desperate need of joining the rest of the first world with free healthcare
>There are Americans who STILL defend corporations like cuckolds

Never change

Attached: 1500497435434.jpg (850x944, 152K)

>If you don't think companies wouldn't just let them starve
Implying that's a bad thing.

>Kek
Why are they being paid so much if anyone can do their job then?
Checkmate, atheist.

>What purpose does it serve for 90% of the wealth to be with 10% of the people?

What system has ever been devised that doesn't result in a pareto distribution of success?

It is if you like capitalism, because the last time that shit happened capitalism came very close to collapsing worldwide.

so farmers are basically freeloaders because of subsidies?

basically.

Abolish welfare. Euthanize elderly people. Sterilize niggers.

edgy

>be farmer
>get welfare from gubbamint to produce a specific cash crop
>spend it on automated sprinkler systems and massive tractors that do all the work
>hire illegal immigrant workers come harvest time
>collect money and repeat

t. old disabled nigger

>introduces the Stop BEZOS bill
how many other businessmen has congress tried to specifically target with legislation?

>wagies

Attached: 1536313586690.jpg (1996x2262, 271K)

Would free healthcare work in the US?

Maybe, maybe not.

The question becomes one of scale. Canada has a population of 36.29 Million people, the UK has a population of 65.64 Million people, France has a population of 66.9 Million people.

California alone has a population of 39.54 million people.

The US has 325.7 Million people in total. Almost 10x the population of our closest neighbor with free healthcare, Canada.

If you think that systems will automatically scale with an input dataset a factor of 10x more than other tested datasets I suggest you re-take your datastructures class.

Why do you think europe countries like Sweden, Germany, Austria and Switzerland have better schools, better prisons, affordable universities and less crime?
Why is the life there so much better, than in the USA?

They don't privatize every fucking important thing.

Subsidies shouldn't exist. They're the exact opposite of free market. And amazon is probably the last company that should get gibs.

>free healthcare ever working here when only 50% of the country is white
Diversity is expensive.

Healthcare isn't a computer program, not sure why you think they would scale similarly.

That's the republican argument

>They don't privatize every fucking important thing.
no niggers

I actually do agree with the proposed bill as well, except that I also predict the companies to be kiked enough to not hire anyone that might already be on welfare, literally increasing unemployment as a consequence

At least some college education is affordable to most Americans especially when you look at pell grants for lower income people

The government is 100% responsible for making them poor so niggers and spics don't have to pay $20 for a gallon of milk. God forbid food prices naturally rise with inflation.

Attached: IMG_20180816_114123.jpg (609x463, 36K)

Attached: wages2.png (998x677, 216K)

Based Tucker Carlson is on based Bernie's side though.
Best timeline.

Attached: Wages.jpg (960x720, 114K)

>He actually thinks that
American detected. Don't you try and tell me mass immigration is a brand new thing either.

>gather 5 million niggers
>pay them 2 rupees an hour
>make them work two shifts
>I'VE GENERATED 10 MILLION JOBS! THIS IS GREAT FOR THE ECONOMY
how the fuck is that any good if they can barely move the economy at all with their shit currynigger wages?

Attached: ClassWarfare.jpg (3112x3456, 1014K)

Weird how it correlates with businesses adopting computers lol

Best thing is that everyone thought that the introduction of computers to work would mean that everyone would work less hours and/or make more money.

Little did we know that all the increased productivity would go right into the pockets of the 1%.

farming subsidies are really cheap, unless of course you're talking about those massive farms who collect more than 80% of federal farming subsidies. plus, i rather pay people to grow food since there's only a few million people who do that and we all need to eat.

>what is the labor market
Subsidies seriously distort it and make it acceptable to employees to work worse jobs and poos and russians, with their so called safety nets being paid by more productive workers (but not by the top C suites, who get massive tax cuts)
Only an absolute retard wouldn't notice how this distorts markets and incentivizes inefficiency

Don't even try, every American is an ashamed soon-to-be millionaire with a humble past and story.

Attached: EYCIAVU.png (142x191, 48K)

>Actually that is a very healthy initiative. I am extremely surprised it comes from the left.
It's coming from Bernie, looks like a false flag desu
This would never survive any house, not even dems would vote for it

Nice try rabbi

Japan has free healthcare with 127 million people, Mexico does as well with 123 million people
It isn't unreasonable for free healthcare to be implemented in the US, specially in a system similar to that of Mexico, where most services are provided by a relatively free and healthy healthcare market
However corruption on the federal level makes this unsustainable and straight up impossible, the big med cartel has lobbied any kind of actual competition out, driving prices to unreasonable heights which is the main reason why people want free healthcare

i actually just checked the wikipedia on Japan's healthcare because I've heard good things about it
It's a nice system. It has flaws, but they could be worked on. I was really floored to find out that the average Japanese person visits the doctor more than twice as often as the average American.

Where do you think we get the methods we calculate statistics with you fucking retard. These rules apply very generally because the were observed in the world at large. We didnt just make this shit up.

Also Japan doesn't have "Free" so much as a national health insurance program
There's like a 30% copay with an upper limit

>mexico have free healthcare

>they are willing to face the wrath of trump to get away from free healthcare

the state of the left

>data structures
>statistics
brainlet

why is there a broken green swastika on top

logo for TechCrunch, presumably

Aren't subsidies a socialist thing in the first place? At face level, I'm all for this.

im a capitalist and i agree with soc bernie.
Remove wellfare, if amazon doesnt pay, the people will find an another job.

The gov't could easily solve the problem by reducing taxes for the poor.

>HOW WILL THEY EVER RECOVER?
You're a fucking retard if you think this will go anywhere.

Yes there is, keeping prices low for the rest of us

I was reading about this the other day but I don't think I understood this well enough.
So are they forcing employers to pay extra for employees under government care programs?
What's stopping those employers from refusing to hire people already under those programs, or at risk of eventually getting into them?
Not American, by the way.

People at Amazon today make as much as any other FAANG company, but of course I'm talking about engineering roles.