>voat.co
>people constantly bitch about it on reddit
>"hurr they're so problematic I hate them" etc etc
>decide to check it out just now
>third post from the top is pic related
hahahaha
I like it
Have you made the switch?
Easton Wilson
Isaac Jones
>Wikipedia
>Legacy
Christian Bell
>look at infogalatic
Nathaniel Wood
t.onions cuck
Logan Carter
examples: any page on zoe quinn/ gamergate, the article on sugar is basically one big ad for the sugar industry and severely downplays how terrible sugar is for you.
Juan Reyes
kek they banned voat.co here in Russia
Joseph Campbell
ehh voat sucks anyways
Joshua Price
yes, it is a form of censorship, that's true
but as someone who values free speech and does run a few small websites where users can post I can tell you this much: if some user nags about some other users post then you can just ignore it and the guy asking for censorship will simply leave. but in the rare cases that someone puts up something highly illegal you have to censor, you can't ignore it and risk someone walks away with your servers and puts them in a evidence locker for years.
there's a difference between corporate censorship and government censorship in a lot of countries, both are censorship but these days government censorship is a lot less restrictive than corporate censorship.
Jacob Lopez
this
Jonathan Hill
Both Gab and Voat have banned people from their platforms for their ideologies despite promising not to
>drop this big proprietary censoring services for this small proprietary censoring services
Most of that list it's pure trash
They don't, they banned weev and The Daily Stormer because muh antisemite/hate speech