OH NO

I'd rather have the 8700k tbqh

that's even better
holy shit

Wait for intel defense force to arrive:
>Multi-core doesn't matter!
>Productivity doesn't matter!
>Price/performance doesn't matter!
>Performance per watt doesn't matter!
>Power usage doesn't matter!
>Temperatures don't matter!
>Soldered dies don't matter!
>Stutters don't matter!
>Streaming doesn't matter!
>Data centers don't matter!
>Locked CPUs don't matter!
>OEMs don't matter!
>Hyperscalers don't matter!
>Upgradeability doesn't matter!
>Anti-competitive business practices don't matter!
>Locked platform features don't matter!
>Synthetic loads don't matter!
>PCI-e lanes don't matter!
>Burnt pins don't matter!
>Heat doesn't matter!
>Server space doesn't matter!
>ECC support doesn't matter!
>Free RAID doesn't matter!
>NVMe RAID doesn't matter!
>StoreMI doesn't matter!
>*NEW* IPC doesn't matter!
>*NEW* 7nm doesn't matter!
>*NEW* HEDT doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Security doesn't matter!
>*NEW* VMware doesn't matter!
>*NEW* MySQL doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Unix doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Linux doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Waffer yields don't matter!
>*NEW* Enterprise doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Stock coolers don't matter!
>*NEW* Games don't always matter!
>*NEW* Hyperthreading doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Benchmarks after full patches don't matter!

>When it comes to overclocking, the CPU only managed to hit 5.0 GHz at 1.4V, which is probably not as high as we expected
Fucking DOA. Good 8700K can hit 5.3 GHz.

jfc what the fuck are intel doing

This thread is very anti-semitic. Banned from 4chin for a week.

This one is weird. How can they not clock it over 5.0GHz, isn't the boost clock 4.9GHz already? Intel are now boosting their CPUs to the max OC capabilities now?
Did they have to sacrifice OC capabilities this fucking hard to be able push out 8-core chips to the mainstream? That's going to hurt them severely, numbers will definitely be lower than a well OC'd 8700k in games.
Intel shooting themselves in the foot again...

haswell does have reason, have one cpu where the tim went bad, and 1 core gets 100c and takes everything else with it down to sub 2ghz levels, meanwhile my 1700 system has no issue with this because the thermal interface does not act as an insulator.

then there is also the if you play games aspect where 6+ cores is better than 4, may not get the same highs but you also don't have the same lows. personally like the headroom my 8 core offers.

1920X goes for $500, that's a 12c/24t cpu

This goes against the law, you will be judged in court of law

Attached: shutitdown.png (752x529, 218K)

Hyperthreading on Intel is a security risk, at least you have won't have that.

AMD is dead

I wish kikes like you were dead tbqh

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FUCKING GOYS
STOP KVETCHING ALREADY AND BUY THE FUCKING CPU

Here, use this

Attached: 1527629778452.jpg (679x758, 54K)

>Own fabrics don’t matter
digitimes.com/news/a20180910PD210.html

So hitler didn't gassed enough?

holocaust never happened but it should have

So this is the power of 8 cores WITHOUT hyperthreading

KEK. Iagine having to buy a new motherboard for your 9700K and only get +20 points in cinebench

boost clock is for 1 core dude

and Intel's way of having giant monolithic dies scales really badly for more cores

which is why adding 2 more cores really tanks the clock speeds

>linux doesn't matter
explain this
as far as I know intel's open source drivers for linux are pretty good. did they changed anything?

Everything is fine 9900K will be amazing and btfo amd all across the board.

Attached: intel2.jpg (224x250, 10K)

8700K's one core boost is 4.7 but over half of all 8700Ks can do ALL cores 5.1.

9900k is literally in Threadripper price range

The 2950x I've been eyeing keeps looking better and better

If you don't play videogames it's very good

What about the i9?

I'm an industrial designer and do a lot of CAD work/rendering as well as use the Adobe suite but play some games too

>Core i5-9600K (6 Core / 6 Thread) ~250 USD
>Core i3-9350K (4 Core / 4 Thread) ~170 USD

>$170 for 4c/4t
>$250 for 6c/6t
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THESE RETARDED KIKES

Why can't Intel stop sucking cocks?

It's fine @ games. The 32 core Threadripper is the one that has issues in games due to the way it handles memory bandwidth between dies. The 16 core does quite nicely so long as you don't try to cheap out on your ram. I would suggest 3466.

add two cores to each and you have amd pricing
ayy

>i9
Just 1770wa- I mean dolla- I MEAN FPS

Attached: 1445873750669.jpg (250x250, 15K)

delid dis

maybe it's because the new 32 core threadripper underperforms on windows because the scheduler doesn't know how to numa.

I think that's in reference to the AMD 2990wx wrecking fucking house on Linux, while being beaten by some Intel chips on Windows, due to NUMA handling being a shit. Not a reference to Intel's fantastic open source drivers.

maxon.net/en/products/new-in-release-20/overview/

maxon.net/en/news/maxon-news/article/cinema-4d-r20-feature-video-chroma/

>Benchmarking 5 versions outdated software

AYYMDPOORFAGS surely are full retards

Oh well, better luck with the 14nm+++ chip.

Attached: file.png (578x413, 235K)

you mean 14nm++++++++++?

Are you brain damaged? Cinema4D and Cinebench are not the same thing.
C4D is the 3D & VFX studio application, Cinebench is just a program that renders a preset scene to benchmark systems. There is no Cinebench R20, because Cinebench and Cinema 4D are not on the same release number.

>2024
>comes up new intel's process
>it's 14nm+25

you mean 14nm+23

>doesn't even know what Cinebench is
>links to a different piece of software
The power of /v/.

Attached: laughing kev.gif (200x200, 1.83M)

>intel roadmap

Attached: pipeline.jpg (1688x795, 280K)

No.
it's +25 because it's 2024 and they're year ahead

Phoronix made several benchmark on intel using full parch vulnerabilities losing a lot performance,other people is disable HT on Linux and linux domine cloud.

Jow Forums BTFO intel using paint.

Stop embarassing yourself.

I will save this post, will be usefull in the future.

>200 bucks from from a 2700x
>0.6 fps more

Attached: Intel-Core-i7-9700K-Juegos-05.jpg (756x568, 169K)

ftfy
>Soldered dies don't matter!
>OEMs don't matter!
>Locked platform features don't matter!
>Synthetic loads don't matter!
>ECC support doesn't matter!
>StoreMI doesn't matter!
>*NEW* VMware doesn't matter!
>*NEW* MySQL doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Unix doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Linux doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Stock coolers don't matter!
>*NEW* Games don't always matter!

If intel can get away with a 5 year old process technology, we can get away with a 5 year old benchmarking tool.

Attached: [HorribleSubs] Asobi Asobase - 08 [720p]_00:02:14_02.jpg (1280x720, 79K)

Based 8400

>Only games and Adobe matter

Hey guys, remember the i9 that had 1/60th the power/area ratio of the Sun, which means it was hotter than some stars?

>240W on auto voltage

Attached: intelfight.jpg (750x418, 68K)

But it will be a GREAT gaming CPU!

Based Chapuzas not giving a fuck about the jews and their NDA crap.

>Intel are now boosting their CPUs to the max OC capabilities now?
Since kaby lake actually
But they were limited by shitty thermal interface.
Now that they actually lidded the die they pushed it as far as they can (advertising 160W CPU as 95W)

Attached: AMDvsIntel.jpg (1439x1211, 83K)

who the hell are you trying to diss there? that pasta of yours is fucking pathetic

>over half of all 8700Ks can do ALL cores 5.1
When delidded at high voltage and like ~180W power draw. And that's 6 cores with hyperthreading. What's wrong with 8 cores w/o hyperthreading getting to 5.0 at 160W?
It's pretty common to use old benchmarks so you can compare old and new CPUs.

i'm all for ryzen, but pic you've shown is clearly caused by gpu bottleneck

BASED QUADS
IT'S OVER INTLEL IS FINISHED

Beaten by cheaper 2600 LUL

That is NOT video games benchmark. Nice try tho AMDrone.

NOT EVEN 1 MORE FPS KIKETEL SHILL AHAHAHAHAAHAHH

cheaper than the i9, but then so is the R7 2700x with both.

Not in that chart. 2600 has lower mins

it's dx12 and dx11 dumbass

requesting new entry:
>having your own fabs doesn't matter

techpowerup.com/247488/tsmc-to-build-intel-14nm-processors-and-chipsets

>1080p doesn't matter
Yes, we need 240p benchmarks!

Still worse

That means 9700k is worse than 2700x lmao

Who the fuck gives a shit about low res 350 vs 360 fps retardation, look at Ryzen here.

Attached: 1534204099106.png (1920x1080, 611K)

Benchmarks mean nothing, i get 3 more fps on the 8600k than the ryzen in most games, and it is cheaper in my country
AMD always sucks for gaming

>and it is cheaper in my country
uma?

Get a better gpu poorfag

But but battlefielf v

Threadripper is only like $450 now

STOP KVETCHING GOY

>Retard doesen't understand that there will be no difference between his r7 2700 and a athlon 8600k

THE MORE YOU BUY THE MORE YOU SAVE

OH NO

Attached: Intel-Core-i7-9700K-Juegos-01[1].jpg (719x379, 99K)

so this.........is intel's sekrit sauce.........

You can save on a Bulldozer if you wont get a better card nigger tier retard

>cheaper 2600 beats 8400
BASED

DELETE DIS NOA!

Attached: ayy.png (623x808, 418K)

Attached: SEETHING AMDrone.webm (1280x720, 479K)

Those spics don't know what they're doing. Stock CB score should be 1530ish.

t. someone that's been testing a 9700K and 9900K