The absolute state of cinnamon

Attached: kde_rename.gif (818x476, 204K)

You're a retard nonetheless

Attached: impress.jpg (3200x1680, 576K)

Nice damage control, tard.

then use a file manager that can do that, thunar has bulk renamer afaik

>a thread died because OP HAD to cry about the most absolute minor issue provided by a gui

It seems KDEtards are taking a break from spewing liquid shit on gnome and instead focusing on one extremely small missed feature in cinnamon. fuck off already

hey Clem how's it going?

meanwhile a million gnu and mac fags make a million "l-look at how inconsistent windows 10 is xddddddd" threads

>[300px of nothing] Desktop [300px of nothing] window controls
>File Edit View Go Bookmarks Help [500px of nothing]
CSD can't come fast enough.

yes it's very space efficient

Attached: GNOME-3.28-settings-avatar.jpg (1280x936, 155K)

Well it's a simple app so you're not going to have many buttons in the header bar. In a more complex one it would prove to be very space efficient though.

Attached: giant.jpg (1280x720, 50K)

tell me how something as important as the system monitor wastes so much space then?

Attached: GNOME-3.28-usage-app.jpg (1140x830, 115K)

And why does it provide so little information?

because it's gnome

Important and complex are not synonyms. There's no other buttons to put in the header bar so it's empty, as opposed to having buttons but distributing them among three different mostly empty layers, how do you not understand the difference here?

show me an example of a complex app that you think is space efficient and uses csd

I hate to meet the 'less is more' mantra person that doesn't label anything in their charts. Literally nothing here is labelled. What's the time frame? What's the clock speed? Why is there no real grid?

you know the answer because gnome. there used to be a time when gnome was still functional

Attached: large.png (800x598, 56K)

I think web browsers and file managers with dynamic content make use of them best.

Attached: firefox-csd-in-ubuntu-17.10.jpg (1280x792, 245K)

i disagree, i think gnome 2 was more efficient and provided more at a slight cost of title bar space

Attached: Ubuntu_Linux_11.04_desktop_screenshot.png (599x374, 168K)

What a shit show it's turned into, how disappointing.

Firefox at least displays the full name of a tab(which will often be obscured) but what justification is there for duplicating the directory name and putting it in it's own bar with the window buttons? That Nautilus window in general makes some awful decisions.

MV and regular expressions

Attached: IMG_20180910_165059.jpg (640x642, 30K)

Feel free to make a pull request.
>github.com/linuxmint/nemo/

Oh what's that?
You are a worthless crybaby who can't code or contribute to the community?

Seems about right for a typical Jow Forums shitposter.

I'm on gnome 3.28 and that's still what my system monitor looks like. Not sure what's up with the other screenshot.

why are there ugly corners on firefox?

ubuntu 18.04 does't count because it uses a 3.26 snap

Attached: 1535040307417.jpg (1312x738, 121K)

Fedora 28

I think that's from when it was in beta.

You can experience it by installing the package "gnome-usage".

Welp I crashed it in two minutes

I'm a Windowsfag but that's a really nice feature.

No way these are default settings.

It's just an edit, but in the original it's still quite large.

I wish it was an edit.

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-09-11 03-34-22.png (871x871, 133K)

Can windows do that? I honestly don't know.

why you delete

Attached: 1536608143186.png (3840x1080, 604K)

because it's too large with irrelevant details.
but on second thought it might be better, since it more properly shows how massive the menus have bloated up.

Windows 10 has much worse problems than simple file management

>administrative rights on a computer with 1 user
Maybe terry davis was on to something after all.

Nope, but it should really be added. Look at the KDE one in , it looks great.

Explorer is a pretty fucking fantastic file manager.

More like
>the absolute state of GTK

Attached: 1535903562678.jpg (876x1024, 268K)

This looks fine.