What are you working on, Jow Forums? Previous thread:
/dpt/ - Daily Programming Thread
Other urls found in this thread:
>you can't reason about procedural code
Most stupid thing I've read today. Ever heard of Hoare logic kiddo?
exploring the deepest, darkest depths of C++.
dumb frogposter
I'm working on a little Haskell program.
Can I get rid of the `pure ()` line? I couldn't find a function with the signature `IO a -> IO ()`.
runParseDocumentTest :: Maybe Feed -> FilePath -> IO ()
runParseDocumentTest feed path = do
_
Employed Haskell programmer reporting in
Employed OCaml programmer reporting in
Nice to see a fp colleague.
Is it technically possible to change the value of the members of an array without the help of an extra variable?
And I don't mean memory address trickery or an expression specific to a language (that still uses an extra variable under the hood)
eww