It's been X months since NN was killed and nothing has hap

No it wasn't. AT&T was sued by the FCC over it, but they won that lawsuit, which prompted the FCC to introduce NN regulations in the first place.

you are clueless. Mobile plans never allowed for one website to be slower than the other. They allow global throttling after you hit your cap
so... it WAS punishable under NN

Yes but NN was never implemented. It was repealed before it would have taken effect.

sounds like we're in the inferior timeline

Grooming?

>the place I live in is a total shithole
>therefore every other place must be a shithole too
Burger logic.

b-but USA #1

Careful with that hate speech user, you could wind up in prison.

mobile faggots should be banned from internet

>throttling is good

Please elaborate.

Seven states have legislated it back in. California has stricter regulations than the federal version did.

He's a contrarian that doesn't like Google or Netflix, so it's a "good" thing that they're being attacked.

This has always happened. The only thing that changed with NN being repealed is Comcast giving me a free speed boost.

Anyone else unironically like the NN repeal because it'll create more filters to post and browse content on websites and weed out the retards shitting up everything?

Good. Fuck faggots watching Netflix off cellular, it takes fucking forever and a half to load gps maps and search results because of them. At least YouTube defaults to 140p if you're on mobile.

>because of them
yes goy it's those content websites' fault, we pocketed 20 billion for (((infrastructure development))) that went nowhere but it's netflix' fault

Fake and gay. You're not allowed to glorify homosexuality (and even if you do, if it's not rampant then nobody gonna touch you). Otherwise it's ok. Source: I'm a rusfag. Pls don't talk you out of your ass.

> because of them
They paid for service too.

Do you accept that if another person wants a cheese in the same supermarekt, you both pay full price for whatever fraction you bought but the supermarket the "unfortunately" has to split it up in corresponding fractions because they just didn't want to transport and store so many cheeses ?

Nigger no amount of good infrastructure can make up for absurd levels of wireless bandwidth abuse by video streaming faggots. It's literally 99% of it at peak times. And since it's fundamentally limited, everyone gets throttled if it's over capacity. You can't squeeze more traffic into a given CDMA window so if you get too much traffic it can't be helped. But it could damn well be helped to throttle video harder than web pages.

now if only there was competition so ISP that could handle the challenge could take over instead of lobbied-up greasi kikes abusing the system...
as I was writing this post, another municipal ISP was killed by a big telecom bill

More like, you get unlimited refills but the machine can only service one guy at time, and there are a few dozen people in line. You are entitled to a refill as much as the next guy, but clearly you should yield if you want to refill a 10 gallon keg to someone who just wants to top off a cup.

>>>>>>wireless carrier

> absurd levels of wireless bandwidth abuse
No, that's what they bought, sorry. And your ISPs should set up more antennas for smaller cells in cities in particular.

Of course if you gather 500 people in the wilderness somewhere and you all want to watch YT it's reasonable enough that the ISPs didn't prepare for it. But it's happening in cities.

That's a good thing.
If you're traffic is at 99% capacity, you shape it so that people using Wikipedia and Twitter can actually load things.

Dumb Redditors don't know how networks work.

just because it's a new article doesn't mean it's not old news. cell carriers have always done this

Except the refills weren't a freebie to a cheap offer but part of a $60 or whatever plan that lets you drink whenever you fucking please [throttled if you get above xx GB total if it's the typical US bullshit].

Of course they're aware that they only have on damn machine, they wouldn't want to offer more service and pay for more water on their end if people don't have a choice anyhow. It affects profits, obviously. They'll just sell access to the same machine to even more people - lel.

>clearly you should yield
fucking no. what's the point of even having a que then?

You realize how these things work? The new laws won't even set in before January.
Jesus Christ are people retarded.

Attached: 1494882429626.jpg (960x720, 61K)

NN never, EVER, applied to mobile networks and this is actually a good thing. Allows companies like T-Mobile to offer free prioritized streaming over their competitors.

denying the Holocaust
whatever

Well it's more of wrestling for the dispenser than a queue. CDMA is like multiple people talking over the same phone line and keep repeating their sentences until the other party gets the message.

They didn't prepare for it in cities either. Remind me how many decades it was since it became the norm to have hundreds of people per city block wanting 100 megabit wireless access?

Then why didn't they punish it?

It worked pretty well, until 3g speeds kicked in, the next thing you know it's already 4g and LTE. Shit takes time and money and people aren't exactly fond of getting a huge radio tower installed overhead.

>Help, oppression! Google and Netflix are being forced to pay for all the bandwidth they're using! We can't let the big corporations so this!
Oh no...

Attached: 1535946727414.jpg (1600x900, 90K)