SSD 300mb=500mb?

is it worth 70% more shekels or should I just go with the cheapest? midtier i5-7 laptop sata only btw

Attached: shitshitdick.jpg (1016x400, 60K)

Other urls found in this thread:

anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Kingston today are only massive piece of shit SSD some Kingston are slow than HDD.

Samsung,sandisk,Corsair,western digital or even PNY are way better.

Only use SSDs with reliable controllers.
So you have 3 options:
Samsung, Crucial/ Micron or Intel.

Why was that though?
I grew up with Kingston as a big flash storage company, and now it seems to be the sittiest ever

what about lowend and highend of the same brand ll i ever feel difference beside transfering 4k porn into other folder/disk?

anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand

Today cheap Kingston ssd begin almost ultra shitty ssd.

Some brand had early TLC cheap memory making bad, but MLC memory or new TLC memory is good outside very heavy video edition.

adata isnt bad for budget

>Cheapest midtier i5-7 laptop
Are you looking at that y530?

ADATA for budget (memepads, old laptops, brining in new life), they're pretty good for the money

Samsung & Crucial are your best best for more powerful builds (take a look at m2 ones too)

this

NEVER buy anything made by Kingston, it'll break in under two years, most likely in under one year.

Or Sandisk.

Attached: BlaZeon_(SNES)_10.gif (320x232, 173K)

ts;db

(too small; didn't buy)

epic

mb
are you talking about cache you fucking retard
makes no difference

Actually not epic, no.

I bought a 500 gig 860 evo for 80 bucks. Totally worth it, very happy with the purchase. 5 year warranty is just the cherry on the top

>Kingston, it'll break in under two years,
Not my experience.
I have a Kingston SSD on my media server running flat out for the last 3 years. Another is in a NUC as a test rig. The NUC was second-hand. Two previous owners.
Never had the slightest problem.
SMART still says they're good.

I use kingston SSDs, but the silver SSDNow ones. They're great for the money desu

If you want a brand to avoid it's OCZ. Their numbers are truely horrible although they have improved a little since their involvement with Toshiba.

I should also add, I've had 3 Crucial SSDs show up DOA on me, and I've stopped using them since that.

Who cares about sequential read speed.
What truly matters is responsiveness (random 4K read),reliability, and price per GB.