Youtube officially launched AV1!

first thing I see is that communist kike talkshow host. fuck off subhuman

What’ is this?

Anime encoders are terrible. They haven't adopted h265 despite being like half the size as h264 and showing no difference in fucking anime.

Weebs really are at the forefront of video technology.

Attached: 1375773299400.jpg (425x419, 19K)

Imagine being so detached from the real world that your first and only reaction to a technology thread is to screech Jow Forums buzzwords in an autistic fit of rage.

You can usually find h265 encodes for blu-ray releases.

Bait harder

Why adopt a format only to be replaced 4 years later? Re-encoding every 4 years archival quality releases is impractical and no one cares about normal releases, so h265 is only used for low-quality/mini-mkv.

So this is only for sub-480p videos? This isn't really relevant to me then but it's nice to see improved support for low-bandwidth streams.

Youtube must die
the Silicon Valley must die

>they haven't adopted h265
(and that's a good thing!)

>Anime encoders are terrible. They haven't adopted h265 despite being like half the size as h264 and showing no difference in fucking anime.

Imagine being this brainlet
x265 take like 7x the time to encode an episode for maybe 40% decrease in file size.

guess which resource is cheaper and cheaper? storage

guess which resource is always limited? TIME.

Attached: apustajasmart.png (1826x1795, 850K)

Anime encoders are the most inept, trying to encode in non hardware decoding modes to deny people enjoying videos on low power SoCs and power efficient GPU hardware decoding

stop watching anime on your phone

Anime uses very advanced subtitles so you have to throw out hardware decoding most of the time anyway.
Also, banding is a much bigger issue, so there is much more incentive to use 10-bit.

Go to hell, also 10-bit H.264 hardware decoding is coming anyway, all you inept animu decoders can't stop the hardware decoding revolution

anandtech.com/show/12835/arm-announces-maliv76-video-processor-planning-for-the-8k-video-future

Attached: 05_Mali-V76 Deep Dive_NoWM_22b_678x452.png (678x381, 75K)

>Go to hell
No U.

I watch anime very comfy on my 4k tv with my Nvidia Shield tv capable of decoding hi10p anime in cpu.

Two can play this game:
Guess which component becomes more and more powerful? CPU.
Thus required time gets reduced.

if you're over 20 and still watch japanese cartoons you should unironically commit suicide

That's great
My X230 does not have hw decoder for h265

This.Also with bitrates over 1Mbit/ s hevc loses its edge on 1080p content. I've read that hevc omits the movement of small background objects to save bitrate and that makes it unsuitable for anime at low bitrates.

>>Guess which component becomes more and more powerful? CPU.
>Thus required time gets reduced.
you are pretty stupid too.

Moore's Law is already stopped, we see just marginal increases in cpu powers each new gen, and yet a protocol jump can easily kill your gains

again I repeat myself: x265 takes from 7 to 9x the time of h264 h10p TODAY, and it's on its way out

>Using outdated, obsolete Thinkpad

KILL YOURSELF FAGGOT

If you're on an anime website complaining about anime, you should unironically commit suicide.

videocardz.com/77895/the-new-features-of-nvidia-turing-architecture

>new NVDEC decoder with HEV YUV444 10/12b HDR, H.264 8K and VP9 10/12 HDR support.

THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA

this is not even considering that your argument backfires on its own:

since cpus get better, any shit produced since 2013 can now play hi10p h264 in cpu

thank god your stupid genes won't reproduce

Moore's Law works only for a single core.
We just got Threadripper and Epyc, you can encode faster than ever by far.

>YUV444
this is good

>anime website
it's not 2006 anymore and you should stop pretending you were old enough to go potty back then, let alone to browse dollchan. also you should kill yourself.

>We just got Threadripper and Epyc, you can encode faster than ever by far.

and it's still way faster on h264

based

Whatever you tell yourself, reddit-kun.

Attached: 1399960207051.png (320x442, 50K)

quick, post anime!

Attached: 1519586369511.jpg (850x1202, 195K)

The encoding scene has slowed way down ever since streaming services came up. Fansubbing is on life support and so is the encoding that use them.

If you spending X time for h264 encoding was acceptable for you three years ago then why spending X-1 for a better h265 encode is wrong now?

>>The encoding scene has slowed way down
Category

Name


Link

Size

Date



Anime - English-translated [HorribleSubs] Steins Gate 0 - 21 [720p].mkv 230.2 MiB 2018-09-12 19:32 1067 77 6362

And its even faster on mpeg2
Your point?

>[HorribleSubs]
That is not the "encoding scene". He's probably talking about Daiz and shit.

>for a better h265
it's not better.
at best, it's the same with smaller size and can play on your smelly chink phone

at worst, x265 is very lazy with small movements and can fuck up anime border lines easily

>r-rebbit
as expected from a developmentally challenged manchild. at least think of suicide a bit more often. toodles.

You don't have to keep re-encoding new ones, just start moving tonit with newer encodes. You can still find old divx encodes of really olda anime. I don't see much demand for it considering there's still a codec war going on.

> The encoding scene has slowed way down
Somebody has to encode BDs, at least. I don't really care about TVs.

What's so special about AV1?

>What's so special about AV1?
royalty free

gets google to save bandwith aka save billions

As usual, less bitrate for the same quality/better quality for the same bitrate, compared to H.265/VP9/H.264.

>it's not better.
>at best, it's the same with smaller size
It means better. Also you can still get better quality with same size. Unless you only download some super high bitrate encodes, then it's probably hardly distinguishable from BD source anyway.

Next-gen video codec.
Royalty free and fully open.

So AV1 + Opus is now the godly codec combination for quality and freedoms.

>Unless you only download some super high bitrate encodes,
I do because I'm not trash like you

Attached: outlawstar.png (1440x1080, 2.13M)

That's horriblesubs, you tard. That's not Reinforce or any number of the dedicated raw encoders out there. HS just rips CR shit.

Attached: 1536731913307.png (800x800, 684K)

Attached: 1425295800699.jpg (1200x800, 107K)

AV1 is slow as fuck, and opus is just two codecs duct-taped together

>I watch children's cartoons

Attached: Screenshot_20180913-020656__01.jpg (476x440, 32K)

You're like one of those muslims that invade europe and demand sharia law. Adapt and integrate or get the fuck out

Then why won't you use better encoded files with half the size and same quality, you elitist scum?
>hurr, I only watch 50 Gbps chinkporn cartoons

I prefer .mkv

>better encoded files
you keep saying things that are not true.

>AV1 is slow as fuck
Every video codec is slow as fuck when it first comes out.
>and opus is just two codecs duct-taped together
So? It's still the best, especially at low bitrates, which is the only place that comparisons are meaningful.

better compression with same quality = better encode
How is that wrong?

>especially at low bitrates, which is the only place that comparisons are meaningful.

anything under 20 Mbps is not worth watching

This is probably bait, but MKV is a container, not a codec.

>Av1 encoding will get faster
LOL no it wont.

>>better compression with same quality = better encode
>How is that wrong?

Study what x265 does with the grain of 35mm film scanned anime.

That doesn't make sense. A bitrate on its own is meaningless without reference to a codec.

libavcodec is 1000x faster than libvpx for vp9 devoding

Purely academical issue.
Gib specific example with filesize and screen comparison.

>Gib specific example

the Evangelion BDs from a couple years ago.
1440x1080 from 35mm scanned film.
you can find torrents for hi10p and x265 encoded at highest settings, the results are clearly in favor of the former.

x265 likes to "average"

at some point bitrate vs filesize vs encoding speed gives diminishing returns. It's why audio comparison over 100kbps regardless of codec is rarely done.

1 week until faster decoder gets revealed
videolan.org/videolan/events/vdd18/

What is this and why is it a good thing

Google is finished

>It's why audio comparison over 100kbps regardless of codec is rarely done
Audio doesn't have a "resolution" or any other quality settings that can keep being increased, so it's basically at a cap.
Sample rate is basically fixed at 44100/48000, because humans cannot hear any frequencies above ~20KHz, and there is no point at going above 16 bits per sample, because you rarely need more dynamic range. So basically, it's just now trying to take what we already have and make it smaller.

Video isn't quite the same, because we can keep adding more and more resolution (until we reach some cap), meaning you need to higher and higher bitrate. Saying "I won't watch anything below 20 Mbps" may make sense for 1080p because generally all codecs will look very good, but doesn't mean that saying that makes sense for 4K or 8K content.

imagine being so detached from real world that you don't realize there's a war being waged against you with the only aim to exterminate you and your loved ones

It's the current year! I mean come on, I thought h264 died in the 60s!

>but doesn't mean that saying that makes sense for 4K or 8K content.
there is nothing worth watching at 4k yet

That's not my point. I was just being pedantic about pulling arbitrary numbers out of the air.

>Sample rate is basically fixed at 44100/48000, because humans cannot hear any frequencies above ~20KHz, and there is no point at going above 16 bits per sample, because you rarely need more dynamic range.

You can probably find a similar upper limit for perfect 10/10 human vision.

>That's not my point. I was just being pedantic about pulling arbitrary numbers out of the air.
my point is that 1080p was implied

Eventually that will probably happen, but we're not there yet.

14 bit hevc is where is it.

>I won't watch anything below 20 Mbps
You must take into account if the movie has lots of action going on. Most anime is over 50% stills and that bitrate is placebo at this point.

>Watching Jewish propaganda

BOOOM BOOM WOOOSH!!!
wow movies weeeee

>only hollywood makes action movies
Seek help. Look under the bed, the jews are out to get you.

there are tons of dope nature videos on youtube.
first thing i did when i transitioned from HD to FullHD was watching those. 95% of them have 4K too.

>youtube """4k"""
yikes

Attached: Screenshot_2018-08-21 (3) Twitter.png (568x433, 381K)

It's not better quality-wise, it's only better because they take a tenth of the time to encode.

let me guess, you watch korean dog-eating movies?

wow 4k 60fps works muuuuch smoother now on my 2200G

Wrong again. Kill yourself anyway.

because it's even more bitstarved