INTEL IS FINISHED AND BANKRUPT, IF THIS COMES AT UNDER 2K USD, AMD WILL HAVE 45 USD/SHARE
THE KIKES` SHRIEKING WILL BE HEARD THROUGHOUT THE UNIVERSE IN PERPETUITY!
INTLEL BTFO
Other urls found in this thread:
valid.x86.fr
tsmc.com
twitter.com
>Highest end server part
>under 2K
Thats not for consumers, its going to have enterprise pricing. $5 to 7k.
NONONONO *PPPPPFFFFFFFSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTT*
>implying
Stop comparing AMD with kiketel, the 64 core will probably be priced somewhere around $4k, I mean 64 fucking cores FUCK
why does it show old intel cpus in the benchmarks? wouldn't it make more sense to test it against a range of servers and newer models? seems fake. i can tell because of the pixels
Because we already know the 28 core shit scores around 5000 points without fucking LN2 or A FUCKING CHILLER
How about you look at the current EPYC pricing, retard. Intel prices Xeons to $10,000 and higher.
The top end 32c/64 EPYC SKUs were over $4k. A 64c/128t halo SKU is going to top that.
AMD needs better margins, and they're going to price their top end higher as they start to gain market share.
Nah I think $4-5k for 64 cores is reasonable, they need to curbstomp intel completely
Take a look at AMD's financials. Despite Zen selling well, despite EPYC selling well and gaining them substantial marketshare, their revenue isn't good. They're just starting to trickle in a profit of a couple billion.
Their margins aren't high enough. They'll be increasing prices. AMD can't afford to spend billions on R&D when they only make a couple billion per year, and still have to pay off the rest of their long term debt of roughly 2 billion.
Not to mention the fact that 7nm wafers are considerably more expensive right off the bat, the 7nm process isn't as mature as 14nm LPP when Summit Ridge went in to production.
Each die is going to have worse yields and higher base cost. AMD isn't going to eat that themselves.