Manjaro is now the #1 Linux distro

>MX
>antiX
Can someone remind me why devuan exists when these 2 did the job far more better?

>Manjaro truly is the best distro.
bad choice in software, letting the ssl cert expire, etc.
There are so many reasons manjaro is cancer
>I just hope they don't get rid of pacman
Its based on arch, and pacman is arches default package manager. You can't just rip out a package manager from a distro and install another, that causes so many fucking issues. And even if you did, then it would barely be an arch fork and thus not manjaro anymore.
Now fuck off, brainlet. Stop shitting up my Jow Forums

>letting the ssl cert expire
It's a community based distro, no one gets paid to do it. Shit like these happens every distro.
>pacman
forum.manjaro.org/t/qt-developer-wanted-pamac-qt/55767

>It's a community based distro, no one gets paid to do it. Shit like these happens every distro.
Bad excuse
>pamac
Geez thats even fucking worse. pamac is atrocious software. Written in python when pacman is written in fucking c. let alone the fact that if you use it to install something from the aur it doesnt prompt you to read the PKGBUILD

>Reactos that high
Wtf is this trash? Reactos is literally un-fucking-useable

Attached: image.jpg (430x592, 235K)

This is just a temporary reversal. Manjaro rolls off the tongue nice and all the kids are watching youtube tutorials of it thinking whoa! I need that!, only to realize themselves going back to windows.

Slackware is the way, the truth and the light you pleb.

The real question is just why Debian isn't #1 by far.

Attached: makian.png (2000x2000, 356K)

>It's a community based distro, no one gets paid to do it. Shit like these happens every distro.
Never saw it happen to Debian.

because not everyone is a lesbian

>using distrowatch

Attached: Oh_My_Sides!.jpg (600x603, 39K)

Wow eOS has barely been updated over the years and its climbed this high? There's something wrong here. Linux distros as a whole are nearly unbearable to use for desktop use but something like Ubuntu is a lot better of an experience. How the fuck is eOS so high when it's unfinished as all fuck in a very noticeable way?

I thought it was downloads

I am

>MX
>AntiX
Do either of these use systemd? I use debian currently

I don't believe you, there are no females on the internet.

You can't download anything from distrowatch

distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=popularity

Even if the devs send the download amount it would be considered fake, and this

>plummeted
>dropped 1 position from 1st to 2nd / 20 displayed variables
wtf

Who said I identify as female?

being a lesbian kind of implies you have two X chromosomes.

>Mint has plummeted to #2
>What happened?

Cinnamon in mint 19 got totally NU icons and they suck incredibly.

>The real question is just why Debian isn't #1 by far.

This has always bothered me at a deep existential level.

Attached: 1522023056180.gif (324x244, 1.11M)

Not in the 21st century it doesnt

that's not market share you retard

only people who don't use linux visit distrowatch

>Distrowatch
>Relevant
Pick one.

DAILY REMINDER THAT DISTROWATCH HAS NO CORRELATION TO REAL WORLD USAGE
UBUNTU IS THE MOST POPULAR DISTRO

No they don't

no Linux user i know IRL has even heard of any distro other than Mint, Ubuntu (kubuntu, lubuntu etc), Arch and Kali

What does this mean for Gentoo?

>Manjaro

Attached: 24e.jpg (500x333, 30K)

>Mint has plummeted to #2
>plummeted to #2
>#2
>plummeted

A bit over dramatic much?

Attached: Untitled-2.jpg (1080x720, 186K)

>

>Manjaro

Attached: bonzi_buddy_2_0_icon_by_the64thgamer-dbfcua6.png (894x894, 1.12M)

Real talk, should I use Manjaro if I'm a lazy cunt? It's either Ubuntu or Manjaro

I was about to install manjaro but then i realized that i couldnt use share x and installed windows 7 again

No. It's based on arch, need I say more?

ubuntu sucks, what is so hard to understand about this?

I thought that point was it was based on arch but stable and easy.

It's not well maintained like *buntu
Not to mention that you still have to compile most non-default packages that you simply get on ubuntu using some random scripts on arch/manjaro

Manjaro just add tons of shit on already not so stable Arch, and only 'advantage' is easy installation. If you find Arch hard to install you shouldn't install Manjaro either. Installing distro is one thing, maintaining is harder part. If you want Arch expirience install Arch, if you're new in *nix world you'll find better time with Ubuntu or Mint.

slackware doesn't even install grub by default

50% of all distros are modified Debian

Arch is the "cool" riced distro everybody talking about. "It's so edgy, it's so documented, it's so fresh".. bla-bla. So normalfag try to install it. It's text and you have to do things yourself. Oh, but then there's almost arch - manjar(o), which is braindeadfriendly and installs with one click.
That's it. Plus distrowatch ratings are misleading, they track how often people look at their pages for distros.
P.S. It's ok, but have lots of crap.

Pamac uses pacman in back end. I don't see you are getting so flustered over this. And why is Pamac bad?
Debian servers went down several times. No one finds Arch hard to install. The word you're looking for is "tedious" and yes it's boring and tedious to install Arch.
Manjaro provides a nice hardware and kernel management frontend that I find useful.
Maintaining Arch requires no extra attention. Arch is pretty stable in my experience, unlike Debian and derivatives in honesty.
I'm not new, I've been using Linux since late 2000's.